Accessibility settings

Published on in Vol 15 (2026)

This is a member publication of University College London (Jisc)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/80511, first published .
Therapist taking notes on patient record during a counseling session.

Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Psychodynamic Therapy Versus Face-to-Face Psychotherapy for Depression (BLENDED Study): Protocol for a Pragmatic, Multicenter, Assessor-Blinded Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial

Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Psychodynamic Therapy Versus Face-to-Face Psychotherapy for Depression (BLENDED Study): Protocol for a Pragmatic, Multicenter, Assessor-Blinded Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial

Journals

  1. Riper H, Kleiboer A, Hoogendoorn A, Bosmans J, Schulte M, Mathiasen K, Hazo J, Holtzmann J, Chevreul K, Ebert D, Titzler I, Berking M, Funk B, van Schaik A, Kemmeren L, Cieslak R, Smoktunowicz E, Maj A, Botella C, Garcia-Palacios A, Banos R, Herrero R, Andersson G, Topooco N, Vernmark K, Berger T, Krieger T, Cerga-Pashoja A, Doukani A, Araya R, Karyotaki E, Kolovos S, Hoogendoorn M, van Breda W, van de Ven P, Rocha A, Gonçalves G, Cuijpers P. Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Blended Treatment for Major Depression Compared With Treatment as Usual Within Routine Care in Europe: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2026;15:e72866 View