Accessibility settings

JMIR Research Protocols

Protocols, grant proposals, registered reports (RR1)

Editor-in-Chief:

Amy Schwartz, MSc, Ph.D., Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Ontario, Canada


Impact Factor 1.5 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 2.4 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Research Protocols  (JRP, ISSN 1929-0748) is a unique journal indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE, Sherpa Romeo, DOAJ, Scopus, Web of Science(WoS)/ESCI, and EBSCO, publishing peer-reviewed, openly accessible research ideas and grant proposals, and study and trial protocols (also referred to as Registered Report Stage 1 papers). 

JMIR Research Protocols received a Journal Impact Factor of 1.5 according to the latest release of the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate, 2025.

With a CiteScore of 2.4 (2024), JMIR Research Protocols is a Q2 journal in the field of General Medicine, according to Scopus data.

It should be stressed however that most authors do not publish their protocols for "impact" or citations, rather to document their ideas to how to design experiments, to document their successful grant proposals, or to publish (and maybe brag a little about) their already funded protocols (which do not require additional peer-review). We offer this platform for scientists to publish peer-reviewed protocols for a very low APF, and unfunded protocols for a reasonable fee that includes peer-review. 

While the original focus was on eHealth studies, JRP now publishes protocols and grant proposals in all areas of medicine, and their peer-review reports, if available (preliminary results from pilot studies, early results, and formative research should now be published in JMIR Formative Research).

JRP is fully open access, with full-text articles deposited in PubMed Central.

Why should I publish my protocol? 

  • JRP publishes research protocols, grant proposals, pilot/feasibility studies and early reports of ongoing and planned work that encourages collaboration and early feedback, and reduces duplication of effort.
  • JRP will be a valuable educational resource for researchers who want to learn about current research methodologies and how to write a winning grant proposal.
  • JRP creates an early scientific record for researchers who have developed novel methodologies, software, innovations or elaborate protocols.
  • JRP provides a "dry-run" for peer-review of the final results paper, and allows feedback/critique of the methods, often while they still can be fixed.
  • JRP enhances rigor and demonstrates to reviewers of subsequent results papers that authors followed and adhered to carefully developed and described a-priori methods, rather than fishing for P-values (HARKing).
  • JRP facilitates and guarantees subsequent publication of results demonstrating that the methodology has already been reviewed, and reduces the effort of writing up the results, as the protocol can be easily referenced.
  • JRP is compatible with the concept of "Registered Reports" and since May 2018, published protocols receive an International Registered Report Identifier (What is a Registered Report Identifier?) and acceptance of the subsequent results paper is "in principle" guaranteed in any JMIR journal and partner journals - see What is a Registered Report?. We assign an IRRID (International Registered Report Identifier) to each published protocol, faciliating the linking between protocol and final study, and also indicating that results papers of studies are also "in principle accepted" for subsequent publication in other JMIR journals (or other members of the IRRID Registry Network) as long as authors adhere to their original protocol - regardless of study results (even if they are negative), reducing publication bias in medicine.
  • Authors publishing their protocols in JRP will receive a 20% discount on the article processing fee if they publish their results in another journal of the JMIR journal family (for example, JMIR for e-health studies, i-JMR for others).

Need more reasons? Read the Knowledge Base article on "Why should I publish my protocol/grant proposal"!

 

Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Proposals (non-eHealth)

Conventional treatments have been frequently reported to offer partial relief for some individuals managing arthritis pain and related symptoms, leading many to consider alternative options, such as cannabis. Informed decision-making about cannabis use requires patients to weigh potential benefits and risks in light of their personal values and preferences.

Article Thumbnail
Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth)

Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography reduces mortality by up to 20%, yet uptake in the United States remains below 6% of eligible individuals. Factors contributing to low uptake include lack of awareness, eligibility confusion, stigma associated with smoking history, and nihilistic beliefs about outcomes. Stigma triggers shame-avoidance behaviors, nihilism undermines perceived screening benefit, and misinformation amplifies both by spreading inaccurate eligibility criteria and exaggerated harms. Social media increasingly shapes how individuals encounter health information, form risk perceptions, and make screening decisions. Because platform architectures differ in content modality, algorithmic curation, and user demographics, single-platform studies cannot reliably characterize the digital information environment or identify platform-specific intervention targets.

Article Thumbnail
Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth)

Research indicates that university students experience higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (SAD) than the general population. In Uganda, existing psychological interventions for addressing SAD among students are primarily delivered face to face, which limits effective diagnosis and treatment due to stigma, a shortage of counselors, and long waiting times, which contribute to significant unmet mental health needs. Consequently, there is an urgent need for innovative approaches to improve access to mental health services.

Article Thumbnail
Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth)

Assessing dental caries, sealants, and fluorosis is essential for public health surveillance, providing critical data to evaluate national prevention programs. Standard methods performed by dental professionals are often limited by affordability, accessibility, and scalability for both population-level and individualized assessments. Mobile health (mHealth) approaches to concurrently detect caries, sealants, and fluorosis have remained largely unexplored, especially at the population level.

Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (non-eHealth)

Few manual chiropractic high velocity, low amplitude (HVLA) type shams have been validated in research. The proposed project is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to assess a novel, full-spine, manual sham chiropractic maneuver and its blinding success.

Article Thumbnail
Systematic Review Protocols

Antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) treatment matures the fetal lung and reduces risks of neonatal morbidity and mortality in babies born preterm. However, ACS treatment also impacts the brain and stress regulatory systems, with increasing clinical evidence for adverse long-term impacts. Preclinical studies are important to investigate the mechanisms for these impacts.

Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (eHealth)

Despite the growing demand for end-of-life home care, nursing educators responsible for on-the-job training face substantial barriers, such as time and geographical constraints, which limit their access to professional development. Collaborative online training programs offer a potential solution to these challenges.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Studies and eHealth/mHealth Development

Neonatal mortality remains a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where health systems often lack effective triage mechanisms to identify and prioritize high-risk neonates. Existing clinical tools frequently fail to support timely decision-making during the critical early postnatal period. A previous machine learning (ML)–based neonatal risk prediction model developed using multicountry LMIC datasets demonstrated high predictive accuracy for neonatal mortality in the Indian context, achieving an area under the curve above 0.80. The model incorporates 11 neonatal parameters assessed from delivery through day 2 of life, with birth weight identified as the strongest predictor.

Article Thumbnail
Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth)

Emergency department (ED) overcrowding threatens health care systems worldwide. This poses risks to patient safety, lowers quality of care, and reduces patient satisfaction. Patient input, defined as the caseload of patients presenting to the ED, is one of the factors contributing to overcrowding. Redirecting patients with nonurgent complaints to external health care services could help alleviate ED workload.

Article Thumbnail
Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth)

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder worldwide, affecting approximately 5%‐7% of school-aged children and 2%‐5% of adults worldwide. However, there is still no reliable diagnostic tool for it. The lack of specific biomarkers further complicates the accurate diagnosis of ADHD.

Article Thumbnail
Scoping Review Protocols

The identification of the methodological path followed by researchers in psychometric studies can contribute to maintaining the transparency and rigor necessary for the study.

Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (non-eHealth)

Tunnel anastomosis is a novel anastomotic technique for digestive tract reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy. A previous retrospective study by our team demonstrated its favorable antireflux effect; therefore, we hypothesize that tunnel anastomosis is noninferior to double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction in preventing postoperative reflux esophagitis, and we will conduct this prospective study to further validate this assumption.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with

  • Crossref Member
  • Open Access
  • Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association
  •  
  •  
  • TrendMD MemberORCID Member
  •  

This journal is indexed in

  • PubMed
  • PubMed CentralMEDLINE
  •  
  •  
  • DOAJDOAJ Seal
    Sherpa RomeoEBSCO/EBSCO Essentials

  •  
  •  
  • Web of Science - ESCI

  •  

  •  
  •