JMIR Research Protocols

Protocols, grant proposals, registered reports (RR1)

Editor-in-Chief:

Amy Schwartz, MSc, Ph.D., Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Ontario, Canada


Impact Factor 1.5 CiteScore 2.4

JMIR Research Protocols  (JRP, ISSN 1929-0748) is a unique journal indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE, Sherpa Romeo, DOAJ, Scopus, Web of Science(WoS)/ESCI, and EBSCO, publishing peer-reviewed, openly accessible research ideas and grant proposals, and study and trial protocols (also referred to as Registered Report Stage 1 papers). 

JMIR Research Protocols received a Journal Impact Factor of 1.5 according to the latest release of the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate, 2025.

With a CiteScore of 2.4 (2024), JMIR Research Protocols is a Q2 journal in the field of General Medicine, according to Scopus data.

It should be stressed however that most authors do not publish their protocols for "impact" or citations, rather to document their ideas to how to design experiments, to document their successful grant proposals, or to publish (and maybe brag a little about) their already funded protocols (which do not require additional peer-review). We offer this platform for scientists to publish peer-reviewed protocols for a very low APF, and unfunded protocols for a reasonable fee that includes peer-review. 

While the original focus was on eHealth studies, JRP now publishes protocols and grant proposals in all areas of medicine, and their peer-review reports, if available (preliminary results from pilot studies, early results, and formative research should now be published in JMIR Formative Research).

JRP is fully open access, with full-text articles deposited in PubMed Central.

Why should I publish my protocol? 

  • JRP publishes research protocols, grant proposals, pilot/feasibility studies and early reports of ongoing and planned work that encourages collaboration and early feedback, and reduces duplication of effort.
  • JRP will be a valuable educational resource for researchers who want to learn about current research methodologies and how to write a winning grant proposal.
  • JRP creates an early scientific record for researchers who have developed novel methodologies, software, innovations or elaborate protocols.
  • JRP provides a "dry-run" for peer-review of the final results paper, and allows feedback/critique of the methods, often while they still can be fixed.
  • JRP enhances rigor and demonstrates to reviewers of subsequent results papers that authors followed and adhered to carefully developed and described a-priori methods, rather than fishing for P-values (HARKing).
  • JRP facilitates and guarantees subsequent publication of results demonstrating that the methodology has already been reviewed, and reduces the effort of writing up the results, as the protocol can be easily referenced.
  • JRP is compatible with the concept of "Registered Reports" and since May 2018, published protocols receive an International Registered Report Identifier (What is a Registered Report Identifier?) and acceptance of the subsequent results paper is "in principle" guaranteed in any JMIR journal and partner journals - see What is a Registered Report?. We assign an IRRID (International Registered Report Identifier) to each published protocol, faciliating the linking between protocol and final study, and also indicating that results papers of studies are also "in principle accepted" for subsequent publication in other JMIR journals (or other members of the IRRID Registry Network) as long as authors adhere to their original protocol - regardless of study results (even if they are negative), reducing publication bias in medicine.
  • Authors publishing their protocols in JRP will receive a 20% discount on the article processing fee if they publish their results in another journal of the JMIR journal family (for example, JMIR for e-health studies, i-JMR for others).

Need more reasons? Read the Knowledge Base article on "Why should I publish my protocol/grant proposal"!

 

Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth)

Advances in antiretroviral therapy (ART) have significantly improved the life expectancy of people living with HIV. However, maintaining retention in care—defined as ongoing engagement with medical services from diagnosis through regular follow-up—is essential for optimal clinical outcomes. Loss to follow-up (LTFU), commonly defined as the absence of ART prescription refills or medical visits for more than 90 days, has been associated with increased mortality, treatment failure, and continued community transmission. Although multiple individual and structural factors have been linked to LTFU, evidence from the Mexican context remains limited.

|
Article Thumbnail
Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth)

First responders (FRs) and frontline workers are frequently exposed to traumatic events within their professional roles. This exposure places them at risk of experiencing acute stress, posttraumatic stress disorder, burnout, and other adverse mental health outcomes. Despite growing awareness of these risks, there remains a lack of evidence-based digital interventions (DIs) tailored to meet their unique mental health needs.

|
Article Thumbnail
Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth)

Understanding interindividual variability in treatment response and toxicity is essential for optimizing outcomes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Molecular and pharmacogenetic markers hold promise in predicting treatment efficacy and adverse effects, particularly in genetically diverse populations. This protocol outlines the methodology for a prospective, nonrandomized observational cohort designed to evaluate molecular and pharmacogenetic factors associated with treatment response and toxicity in Indian children diagnosed with ALL.

|
Article Thumbnail
Systematic Review Protocols

Hypertension is a chronic condition and a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease, stroke, and premature mortality worldwide. While blood pressure (BP) monitoring—via clinical, home, or ambulatory measurements—remains the primary diagnostic tool, each method is limited by variability, device inaccuracy, and difficulties in detecting atypical BP patterns such as masked or white-coat hypertension. These challenges underscore the need for innovative, complementary diagnostic approaches.

|
Article Thumbnail
Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth)

Despite the availability of effective vaccines, flu and COVID-19 uptake remains suboptimal, including among Indigenous communities in California who face unique barriers to accessing public health information. While previous research has evaluated health communication message content and design, fewer studies have systematically compared different dissemination strategies for the same intervention, leaving gaps in understanding optimal approaches for reaching marginalized populations.

|
Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (eHealth)

Across the United States, there are millions of informal (ie, unpaid) caregivers helping individuals with Alzheimer Disease/Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias (AD/ADRD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), or both. TBI is a risk factor for developing, and often co-occurs with, AD/ADRD. In the next decade, more informal caregivers will have to navigate the complexities of the dual diagnosis of TBI and AD/ADRD. Currently, there is a paucity of interventions for caregivers dealing with this dual diagnosis. Our team designed the TBI-AD/ADRD caregiver support intervention (TACSI) as a support program to meet the needs of those providing care to individuals with dual diagnoses of TBI and AD/ADRD.

|
Article Thumbnail
NIH funded proposals with peer-review reports (USA)

People at greatest risk for poor HIV outcomes include young (13-34) people of color who have sex with men. Individuals in this population are least likely to be aware of their HIV status and are at the highest risk for disengaging from medical care and antiretroviral therapy. The Positive Peers mobile app (PPA) was designed to engage this population with real-time social support, HIV and healthy lifestyle information, and medical management tools. We expect that greater PPA engagement will predict key HIV care outcomes. Study predictions are grounded in a user-centric model of digital media use and the perceived affordances of the PPA.

|
Article Thumbnail
Systematic Review Protocols

Large language model (LLM)–based chatbots are rapidly being repurposed as patient-facing digital health tools. Their interactive, adaptive, and seemingly empathic behavior can heighten engagement and expectancy—nonspecific factors that complicate causal inference. Yet, comparator strategies in LLM trials are inconsistently defined and often undermatched (eg, minimal education vs highly engaging chatbots), risking biased effect estimates and poor reproducibility.

|
Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (eHealth)

University students may remain sedentary for large parts of the day, spending >9 hours per day sitting. Prolonged sitting is associated with increased risk for adverse health outcomes in adulthood. Light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) can be integrated into university students’ daily routines to counteract the negative effects of prolonged sitting on cognitive function and musculoskeletal health.

|
Article Thumbnail
CIHR funded proposals with peer-review reports (Canada)

In mixed methods research (MMR), researchers combine elements of qualitative and quantitative methodologies, methods of data collection and analysis, viewpoints, and integration procedures to gain a deeper understanding of what is being studied, design culturally specific tools, and explore the conditions under which health care interventions succeed or fail. Integration is considered the hallmark of MMR and can occur at various levels, such as sampling, data collection, and analysis. MMR is particularly useful for investigating complex, multilevel programs and interventions and is well-suited to address research problems involving knowledge translation, program evaluations, or comparisons of therapeutic interventions. Although there are many potential benefits of mixed methods in health research, the extent to which mixed methods studies implement integration remains limited, with this specific gap persisting for almost 20 years. The Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) reporting guidelines were developed in 2008 to help improve the quality of reporting in mixed methods reports and articles. Since then, the field of mixed methods has evolved rapidly, and the guideline no longer reflects current practices and innovations.

|
Article Thumbnail
RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (non-eHealth)

Total hip arthroplasty is a highly successful procedure for treating hip arthritis, improving patients’ pain, function, and quality of life (QoL). Scarce publications on total hip arthroplasty performance using Brazilian-manufactured materials report results comparable to those from other countries.

|
Article Thumbnail
Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth)

After a burn injury, the survivors have to manage and integrate the physical, psychological, and social consequences of their injury into their daily lives, such as functional limitations, aesthetic complaints, and fatigue. How successful survivors of burn injuries are at this depends on their self-management skills. Health care professionals play an important role in supporting the self-management of survivors of burn injuries. Currently, there are no burn-specific self-management support interventions. Therefore, we developed a self-management support intervention for survivors of burn injuries, called BreeZe (Brandwonden en Zelfmanagement).

|

Preprints Open for Peer Review

|

Open Peer Review Period:

-

We are working in partnership with

  • Crossref Member
  • Open Access
  • Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association
  •  
  •  
  • TrendMD MemberORCID Member
  •  

This journal is indexed in

  • PubMed
  • PubMed CentralMEDLINE
  •  
  •  
  • DOAJDOAJ Seal
    Sherpa RomeoEBSCO/EBSCO Essentials

  •  
  •  
  • Web of Science - ESCI

  •  

  •  
  •