This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Qualitative Methods (142) Tools and Questionnaires in Human Factors Evaluation (80) Design, Usability, and Evaluation of Research Instruments, Scales, and Measures (95) Validity, Reliability, and Bias (113) Methods in Human Factors Research (69) Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools (786) Design, Usability, and Evaluation of Research Instruments, Scales, and Measures (95) Methods in Human Factors Research (69) Validity, Reliability, and Bias (113) Organizational Issues (231)

Published on in Vol 15 (2026)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/77554, first published .
Validity and Reliability of the Psychodynamic Organizational Diagnostic Instrument SyMOA: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Validity and Reliability of the Psychodynamic Organizational Diagnostic Instrument SyMOA: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Validity and Reliability of the Psychodynamic Organizational Diagnostic Instrument SyMOA: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Authors of this article:

Anne-Maria Müller1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sophia Sachs1 Author Orcid Image ;   Yannik Rieder1 Author Orcid Image ;   Claas Lahmann1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

Anne-Maria Müller   1 , MA ;   Sophia Sachs   1 , MSc ;   Yannik Rieder   1 , MSc ;   Claas Lahmann   1 , Prof Dr Med

1 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Corresponding Author: