This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-Randomized Studies (funded, eHealth) (105) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (586)

Published on in Vol 13 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/57663, first published .
Reliability and Sensitivity of a Virtual Assessment Developed for Workplace Concussions: Protocol for a Method-Comparison Study

Reliability and Sensitivity of a Virtual Assessment Developed for Workplace Concussions: Protocol for a Method-Comparison Study

Reliability and Sensitivity of a Virtual Assessment Developed for Workplace Concussions: Protocol for a Method-Comparison Study

Authors of this article:

Keely Barnes1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Heidi Sveistrup1, 2, 4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Mark Bayley6, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   Michel Rathbone8 Author Orcid Image ;   Monica Taljaard3, 9 Author Orcid Image ;   Mary Egan1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Martin Bilodeau1, 2, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Motahareh Karimijashni1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Shawn Marshall2, 3, 10 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Journals

  1. Barnes K, Sveistrup H, Bayley M, Egan M, Bilodeau M, Rathbone M, Taljaard M, Karimijashni M, Marshall S. Investigation of Study Procedures to Estimate Sensitivity and Reliability of a Virtual Physical Assessment Developed for Workplace Concussions: Method-Comparison Feasibility Study. JMIR Neurotechnology 2024;3:e57661 View