Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

RCTs - Protocols/Proposals (non-eHealth) (930) Safety and Error Prevention in Health (320) Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (190) Development of Novel Medical Devices and Innovations for Existing Devices (150) Medical Device Adverse Events, Errors, Safety (36) Clinical engineering (22) Clinical Trials and Protocols in Perioperative Medicine (34)

Published on in Vol 15 (2026)

This is a member publication of Bodleian Libraries (Jisc)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/93391, first published .
Nurse adjusts oxygen nasal cannula on smiling patient in hospital room.

Study of High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation vs Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation for Emergency Type 2 Respiratory Failure: Protocol for a Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Study of High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation vs Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation for Emergency Type 2 Respiratory Failure: Protocol for a Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Mui Teng Chua1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Darius Shaw Teng Pan3, 4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Alexander Jet Yue Ng1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Crystal Harn Wei Soh1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Win Sen Kuan1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics
All Time | Last Month | Last Six Months | Last Year
There are currently no tweets available for this article within the specified range.