Published on in Vol 12 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/40675, first published .
Design and Implementation of the Surveys of Women: Protocol for an Address-Based Sampling Multimodal Study

Design and Implementation of the Surveys of Women: Protocol for an Address-Based Sampling Multimodal Study

Design and Implementation of the Surveys of Women: Protocol for an Address-Based Sampling Multimodal Study

Journals

  1. Fuentes L, Douglas-Hall A, Geddes C, Kavanaugh M, Harville E. Primary and reproductive healthcare access and use among reproductive aged women and female family planning patients in 3 states. PLOS ONE 2023;18(5):e0285825 View
  2. Kavanaugh M, Friedrich-Karnik A. Has the fall of Roe changed contraceptive access and use? New research from four US states offers critical insights. Health Affairs Scholar 2024;2(2) View
  3. Kavanaugh M, Hussain R, Little A. Unfulfilled and method‐specific contraceptive preferences among reproductive‐aged contraceptive users in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin. Health Services Research 2024;59(3) View
  4. Hale N, Lee J, de Jong J, Smith M, Khoury A. Contraceptive Method Use Among a Population-Based Cohort During the South Carolina Choose Well Initiative. JAMA Network Open 2024;7(4):e248262 View
  5. Jackson H, Rendall M. Lifetime abortion incidence when abortion care is covered by Medicaid: Maryland versus five comparison states. Health Services Research 2024;59(5) View
  6. Jackson H, Rendall M. Addressing Abortion Underreporting in Surveys with the List Experiment: Lifetime and Five-Year Abortion Incidence with Multivariate Estimation of Socio-Demographic Associations in Two U.S. States. Population Research and Policy Review 2025;44(1) View
  7. Neiman E, Bornstein M, Turner A, Kavanaugh M, Gallo M. Use of period- or fertility-tracking technologies pre- and post-Dobbs. Contraception 2025:110812 View
  8. Alvis K, Keesee J, Bornstein M, Norris Turner A, Pensak M, Gursahaney P. Perceived Infertility and Contraceptive Use Among Reproductive-Aged Women in Ohio. Women's Health Issues 2025;35(3):180 View
  9. McFarland K, Gallo M, Smith M, Turner A, Bessett D. Awareness and perceptions related to self-managed abortion in Ohio after Dobbs. Contraception 2025;148:110941 View
  10. Yang T, Smith M, Kavanaugh M, Ricks J, Gallo M, Rosenbaum J. Prevalence of crisis pregnancy center attendance among women in four U.S. states. PLOS One 2025;20(6):e0324228 View
  11. Cartwright A, Hussain R, Little A, Zolna M, Kavanaugh M. Assessing the Impact of Dobbs on Abortion Perceptions and Attitudes in More Restrictive Versus Less Restrictive State Policy Environments: Evidence from Arizona, Wisconsin, and New Jersey. Journal of Women's Health 2025;34(6):855 View
  12. Cartwright A, Hussain R, Mitchell L, Kavanaugh M. Variation in three pregnancy attitude measures and changes from 2019–2020 to 2022–2023 in Arizona, New Jersey, and Wisconsin. Contraception 2025;152:111182 View
  13. Jackson H, Rendall M. Combining the list-experiment and direct question to improve estimation of abortion incidence. American Journal of Epidemiology 2025;194(12):3549 View
  14. Olson H, Douglas‐Hall A, Haas M, Kavanaugh M. How Health Insurance Instability Differentially Impedes Access to Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, by Race/Ethnicity and Nativity. Health Services Research 2025 View
  15. Bullington B, Muñoz I, Boscardin W, Rocca C. Pregnancy Preferences and Incident Pregnancy in the US. JAMA Network Open 2025;8(10):e2536697 View