Published on in Vol 11 , No 8 (2022) :August

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/40568, first published .
Grocery Delivery to Support Healthy Weight Gain Among Pregnant Young Women With Low Income: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Grocery Delivery to Support Healthy Weight Gain Among Pregnant Young Women With Low Income: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Grocery Delivery to Support Healthy Weight Gain Among Pregnant Young Women With Low Income: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Original Paper

1Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States

2School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States

3New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States

4Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MI, United States

5Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States

6Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States

7Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, United States

Corresponding Author:

Marika Waselewski, MPH

Department of Family Medicine

University of Michigan

1018 Fuller Street

Ann Arbor, MI, 48104

United States

Phone: 1 734 998 7120

Email: marikag@med.umich.edu


Background: Excessive weight gain during pregnancy is associated with complications for both the mother and her infant including gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders, operative delivery, and long-term obesity. A healthy diet during pregnancy promotes healthy gestational weight gain and determines fetal epigenetic programming in infants that impacts risk for future chronic disease.

Objective: This project will examine the impact of grocery delivery during pregnancy on the weight, diet, and health outcomes of young pregnant women and their infants.

Methods: A three-arm randomized controlled trial design will be performed. A total of 855 young pregnant women, aged 14-24 years, from across the state of Michigan will be enrolled and randomized equally into the three study arms. Participants in arm one (control) will receive usual care from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC); arm two will receive WIC plus biweekly grocery delivery; and arm three will receive WIC plus biweekly grocery and unsweetened beverage delivery. Weight will be assessed weekly during pregnancy, and total pregnancy weight gain will be categorized as above, below, or within guidelines. Additionally, dietary intake will be assessed at three time points (baseline, second trimester, and third trimester), and pregnancy outcomes will be extracted from medical records. The appropriateness of pregnancy weight gain, diet quality, and occurrence of poor outcomes will be compared between groups using standard practices for multinomial regression and confounder adjustment.

Results: This study was funded in April 2021, data collection started in December 2021, and data collection is expected to be concluded in 2026.

Conclusions: This study will test whether grocery delivery of healthy foods improves weight, diet, and pregnancy outcomes of young moms with low income. The findings will inform policies and practices that promote a healthy diet during pregnancy, which has multigenerational impacts on health.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05000645; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05000645

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40568

JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(8):e40568

doi:10.2196/40568

Keywords



The United States has one of the highest adolescent pregnancy rates among high-income countries with almost 800,000 15- to 24-year-old women giving birth in 2021 [1-3]. Among youth who give birth, over half gain excessive weight during pregnancy [4-8]. Excessive weight gain during pregnancy is associated with complications for both the mother and her infant including gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders, operative delivery, and long-term obesity [5,9-15]. Young women with low income and those from racial/ethnic minority groups have the highest rates of adolescent pregnancy and face significant barriers to healthy food and beverage consumption and physical activity during pregnancy [16-21].

A healthy diet during pregnancy promotes healthy weight gain among mothers [22] and impacts permanent fetal epigenetic programming that determines future risk for chronic disease among infants [23,24]. However, most youth consume suboptimal diets that can lead to unhealthy weight gain in pregnancy [25-28]. Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption during pregnancy is further associated with lower diet quality and greater total energy intake among pregnant women [29].

Grocery delivery is a well-established and inexpensive service that removes logistical barriers to obtaining healthy foods and beverages. There are numerous grocery delivery services (eg, Shipt.com, Instacart, FreshDirect, Amazon Fresh, Peapod, and Google Express) that help make obtaining fresh food and groceries more convenient for those who cannot or do not shop in person. However, grocery delivery is predominantly used by affluent middle-aged women [30,31], and few efforts have yet explored online grocery ordering and delivery for young pregnant Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) beneficiaries [32], a population with significant logistical barriers to obtaining healthy foods.

To address this critical problem, we developed Special Delivery, a program that uses grocery delivery to overcome these logistical barriers to a healthy diet during pregnancy among pregnant young women with low income to prevent excessive gestational weight gain.

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to assess whether grocery delivery of healthy foods to the homes of young women during pregnancy will promote healthy pregnancy weight gain. The study will also assess secondary outcomes of diet quality, pregnancy complications, and delivery outcomes. Our long-term goal is to identify effective interventions to support a healthy diet during pregnancy and promote healthy weight gain among pregnant young women with low income.

The primary hypotheses to be tested are that the home delivery of healthy foods will promote healthy weight gain during pregnancy and that the addition of unsweetened beverage delivery will promote more healthy weight gain. The findings will inform policies and practices that promote a healthy diet during pregnancy, which may have multigenerational impacts.


Study Design

This study is a three-arm randomized controlled trial with an additive parallel design. Enrollment in the study is rolling and starts as early as possible in the pregnancy (by 21 weeks’ gestation). The intervention period begins at enrollment and continues to the end of pregnancy/birth (Figure 1). Data collection occurs throughout the study with surveys at baseline, the second trimester, the third trimester, and after delivery, as well as short weekly assessments. Upon enrollment in the study, participants will be randomized to one of three groups: usual WIC (arm 1; control), usual WIC + delivery of WIC-approved food (arm 2), and usual WIC + delivery of WIC-approved food plus unsweetened beverages (arm 3).

Figure 1. Participant study timeline. WIC: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.
View this figure

Specifically, we will be testing the following hypotheses:

  • Mothers who receive free grocery delivery of WIC-approved healthy foods will have healthier weight gain during pregnancy, higher-quality diets, and fewer perinatal complications than peers with usual WIC benefits
  • Mothers who receive free grocery delivery of WIC-approved healthy foods plus unsweetened beverages will have healthier weight gain during pregnancy, higher-quality diets, and fewer perinatal complications than peers with usual WIC benefits and home delivery of WIC-approved foods only

The rationale for the study is that grocery delivery will address barriers to accessing healthy foods and will therefore facilitate a healthier diet and prevent excessive weight gain during pregnancy.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (HUM00190614).

Participants

The study will include 855 young moms who are pregnant with their first child. Those with previous births are excluded to limit the impact of variable past pregnancy experiences and habits on the intervention. Participants will be included from across the state of Michigan based on the criteria below.

  • Inclusion criteria
    • Youth (ages 14-24 years)
    • Enrolled in WIC
    • Gestational age ≤20 weeks
    • SMS text message capability
    • Healthy singleton pregnancy
    • Nulliparous
    • Consume SSBs
    • Living within delivery zone of a grocery delivery service
  • Exclusion criteria
    • Non-English speaking
    • Participants who live at the same address
    • High-risk pregnancy requiring specialized care

Procedure

Participants in this study will be referred from WIC offices, online study recruitment sites, or other clinical and community organizations that serve young pregnant women across the state of Michigan. Interested women complete an online screening and enrollment survey or call the study line for assistance in completing the survey. Consent is obtained verbally or in completion of the online enrollment form and a copy of the consent form is emailed to participants.

Sample Size Determination

Based on nationally representative studies of weight gain in pregnancy [4], we anticipate 30%, 45%, and 60% of participants in arm 1 (control), arm 2 (WIC + food delivery), and arm 3 (WIC + food plus unsweetened beverage delivery), respectively, to gain weight within the Institute of Medicine guidelines [5,33]. The sample size was determined using methods for comparing independent proportions, and a conservative alpha value of .01 was set for significance to address the multiple testing of 3 comparisons. A sample size of 774 (258 per arm) after attrition will have over 80% power (2-tailed) to detect these differences as statistically significant. Accounting for an anticipated 10% attrition rate based on our preliminary study and low-burden design, we will aim to recruit 285 participants per study arm (855 total).

Randomization

Upon completion of baseline screening and assessments, 855 pregnant young women will be randomly assigned to either the control group or one of the two experimental groups. We will use county-level block randomization to assign participants in a 1:1:1 ratio to the three study arms. The treatment assignments will be created and stored in the Consulting for Statistics, Computing and Analytics Research randomization tool managed by the University of Michigan. No treatment assignments will be made until after collection of baseline data (consent, demographic survey, diet recalls, and other baseline questionnaires). At this time, the participant will be notified of their arm assignment and additional details required for grocery delivery (delivery address, day, and time) will be collected from participants in arms 2 and 3. All personnel who assess study outcomes are masked to group assignment. Participants and staff implementing the grocery delivery are not masked to group assignment.

Intervention

All groups will receive usual WIC nutritional assessment and counseling benefits, including monthly nutritional counseling sessions based on a state-approved curriculum with trained nutritionists and peer counselors [34,35]. These sessions are designed to support each woman’s motivations for healthy diet in pregnancy and include education on healthy diets, portion sizes, minimizing SSB intake, cooking skills, and recipes. The intervention period will begin at study enrollment and continues until the end of pregnancy (termination or miscarriage) or infant birth.

The control group (arm 1) will receive usual WIC counseling, as described above, and food benefits loaded onto their Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) card to use in person at approved grocery stores. At completion of study participation, arm 1 participants will receive a 1-year prepaid subscription to a grocery delivery service of their choosing.

Participants in arm 2 (WIC counseling + food delivery) will choose WIC-approved foods from an online survey, which will be purchased and delivered to their home biweekly by the study team via a grocery delivery service at no cost to the participant. Fruit and vegetable options will be offered as well as whole grains (cereal, bread, pasta) and proteins (milk, egg, cheese) as listed in the WIC-approved foods booklet (Textbox 1) [36]. The quantities of food will follow the WIC-approved allocations for each month. Participants must text or call the study team to confirm they received the food. These deliveries are not meant to replace their normal grocery shopping or use of WIC benefits but rather to make healthy eating more convenient, and participants are not restricted in their use of WIC food benefits by participating in this program. These foods are in addition to the WIC benefits they already receive.

Example grocery delivery options.

Vegetables

Baby carrots, broccoli, bell peppers, cauliflower, radishes, snap peas, green peas, avocados, tomatoes, cucumbers, celery, mushrooms, spinach, corn.

Fruits

Apples, pears, oranges, clementines, grapes, bananas, nectarines, peaches, strawberries, blueberries, raspberries, blackberries, watermelon, pineapple.

Proteins and grains

Yogurt, cheese, milk, whole grain bread, whole grain buns, whole grain tortillas, brown rice, whole grain cereal, beans, lentils, peanut butter, eggs.

Unsweetened beverages

Seltzer water, unsweetened tea, Spindrift, sparkling tea, bottled water

Textbox 1. Example grocery delivery options.

Participants in arm 3 (WIC counseling + food plus unsweetened beverage delivery), the home delivery of healthy foods, as described above, will be supplemented with the inclusion of participant-selected unsweetened beverages, in quantities comparable to their current SSB intake (based on self-reported consumption). Unsweetened beverages are intended to replace current SSB consumption. Because SSBs contribute to a significant number of excess calories among youth, this group includes unsweetened beverage delivery to further promote healthy weight gain. The unsweetened beverage choices will include bottled water (flavored or unflavored), unsweetened seltzer water (flavored or unflavored), and unsweetened teas. Artificially sweetened beverages and SSBs will be excluded.

Participant Retention

Our study is designed to be low burden, so participants only have to maintain minimal communication via text, phone call, or email to remain in the study. In addition, participants are incentivized with Amazon gift cards for various components of the study. Participants in all arms receive US $20 for completing the enrollment process, baseline survey, first diet recall, and medical record request form. Participants in all arms will receive US $20 for each additional diet survey completed on their own throughout the course of the study (up to 5 total). For each week participants use their study provided scale, they will receive US $1, and an additional US $10 is given for the end-of-study interview. Women in the intervention arms receive biweekly grocery deliveries during their pregnancy, while women in the control arm receive free access to 1 year of a grocery delivery service at the end of their pregnancy. The resulting maximum incentive for participation is US $160 for participants who enroll at 10 weeks’ gestation, complete all study questionnaires, and remain active for the remaining 7 months of their pregnancy.

Data Collection

At baseline, interested and eligible participants will complete the consent process to participate and respond to baseline measures, described in detail below. In addition to the baseline surveys, participants will be asked to share weight, physical activity, and diet recall data at specified times throughout the study period. The complete list of outcomes, covariates, and timeline of assessments is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Study outcomes and covariates with timeline of data collection.
MeasureData sourceTime points
Primary outcome

Total and weekly weight gain in pregnancy: above, below, or within guidelines
  • Prepregnancy weight: self-report and medical record review
  • Pregnancy weight gain: BodyTrace scale and medical record review
At enrollment, weekly during pregnancy
Secondary outcomes

Diet quality: Healthy Eating Index score
  • Paired ASA24a diet recall surveys
Twice at baseline, twice at second trimester, twice third trimester

Prenatal complications: gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders; delivery complications: operative delivery, shoulder dystocia, postpartum hemorrhage; and birth weight: small/large for gestational age
  • Medical record review
Postpartum
Process measures

Delivery of WICb-approved food and unsweetened beverages
  • Online grocery delivery orders; requested monthly by participants
Biweekly deliveries

Experience with deliveries
  • Phone interview
Postpartum

Medical/WIC record release
  • SignNow e-signature
At enrollment
Confounders/modifiers

Age, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, home environment, food insecurity
  • Demographic survey
At enrollment

Physical activity
  • Physical activity survey
Weekly during pregnancy

Food behaviors
  • Cooking frequency, fast-food frequency, cooking confidence, eating disorder examination
At enrollment, postpartum

Body shape preference
  • Pulvers body image instrument
At enrollment, postpartum

WIC nutrition visits and food benefits redeemed
  • WIC record review
Postpartum

aASA24: Automated Self-Administered 24-hour.

bWIC: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

Sociodemographic Data

All sociodemographic data will be collected upon enrollment online or by phone with the study team. These include date of birth (to calculate age), self-reported race and ethnicity, highest level of education, free/reduced lunch status while in school (a valid measure of socioeconomic status among youth) [37], full address including zip code (for grocery delivery and delivery of BodyTrace scale), home environment (validated Home Food Environment assessment [38,39], other individuals in household, access to transportation), and a validated two-question food insecurity screen for youth to determine baseline access to food [40,41]. Participants’ and household members’ food allergies and cultural/religious food preferences will also be collected upon enrollment.

Weight and BMI

Prepregnancy weight and height will be obtained by self-report and verified by medical record review after birth to determine prepregnancy BMI and identify target weight gain zones. Weekly weight measurements during pregnancy will be measured via a BodyTrace scale and recorded automatically using cellular connectivity (no Wi-Fi or cellular plan required) [42]. The scale will be mailed to participants’ homes upon enrollment. The BodyTrace scale provides valid weight measures and has been used by several other large-scale weight interventions [43-45].

Dietary Intake

Dietary intake will be measured with paired assessments using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) dietary recall survey [46-48]. This process has been validated by comparison to in-person 24-hour recalls and has been used by other studies of pregnant youth with low income [49,50]. At enrollment, participants will complete their first recall over the phone with the study team. A second baseline ASA24 survey will then be completed, approximately 2 to 5 days after enrollment. Participants will complete four additional ASA24 surveys using the same paired system during the intervention period. Two will be completed in the second trimester and two in the third trimester. Study team members will be available, as needed, to assist participants in completing all ASA24 surveys. Paired responses will be combined and used to calculate a Healthy Eating Index (HEI) score for each time point: baseline, second trimester, and third trimester [46,51]. The output from the ASA24 includes additional data on fruit and vegetable servings as well as other macronutrient data.

Physical Activity

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends an exercise program of moderate intensity exercise for at least 20 to 30 minutes per day on most or all days of the week for pregnant women [52]. To measure physical activity, we will use an adaptation of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey and National Youth Physical Activity and Nutrition Study survey item that has been validated with accelerometer data [53-56]. The survey will be sent weekly via SMS text message to assess the proportion of time youth meet the guidelines, as physical activity impacts weight gain in pregnancy.

Body Size Preference

Participants will complete the validated Pulvers Body Image [57] scale at enrollment and during the phone interview after birth to assess their body size preferences. At baseline, participants will be asked to identify their prepregnancy body shape and ideal body shape from the 9 options included in the Pulvers scale. At follow-up, participants will be asked to identify their current (postpartum) body shape and ideal body shape. Participants’ preference in body size may impact their weight-related behaviors and provides critical context on whether they wish to be or stay bigger after pregnancy or try to return to their prepregnancy size [58].

Food Behaviors

Participants will be prompted to complete questions adapted from the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Short and Youth Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire at baseline and end of study to identify perceptions of loss of control of eating, binge eating, weight/shape overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction [59-61]. Additional questions drawn and adapted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey focused on the frequency of home-cooked meals in the household and fast-food meals [62] will also be asked as well as participants’ confidence in cooking meals [63,64]. These questions will be assessed during the baseline and end-of-study survey assessments.

Text Message Reminders

SMS text messages will be sent to participants in all arms using Textizen.com, a GovDelivery platform. Participants will receive 2 to 3 SMS text messages per week reminding them to confirm their delivery, place their order, step on their scale, and respond to physical activity questions. These SMS text messages will also prompt participants to share any updates they may have regarding their pregnancy, allowing participants an opportunity to report on infant birth, miscarriage, or any other outcomes. In addition, participants will be prompted via SMS text message to complete their diet recall surveys throughout their pregnancy.

Medical Records Data

Medical records will be requested from participants’ prenatal and delivery care sites within a few weeks of delivery using the release forms completed at enrollment. Data collected will include all health care visits during pregnancy and up to 12 weeks postpartum, including prenatal visits (diagnoses and complications), nutrition visits (number and content of visits), emergency department visits, inpatient stays, WIC counseling visits (number and type: nutrition vs breastfeeding), quantity of WIC foods redeemed, laboratory results (1-hour glucose tolerance test, A1C, blood glucose levels, complete blood count, urine studies, liver/renal studies), vital signs (weight, height, blood pressure, pulse), medications prescribed, complications during prenatal care (gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders), infant birth weight, and gestational age at delivery.

End-of-Study Interview

A phone interview will be performed after each woman gives birth to collect qualitative insights into participants’ experience with grocery/beverage delivery; the impact of delivery on their diet; overall WIC experiences; and end-of-pregnancy body preference, self-reported weight gain, physical activity, any prenatal or childbirth complications, plans for breastfeeding, and food insecurity.

Data Analysis

To understand the effect of grocery delivery on pregnancy weight gain, diet quality, and health outcomes, weight will be measured weekly, dietary quality will be assessed twice per trimester, and perinatal outcomes will be assessed at the end of the pregnancy. All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Prior to analysis, assessment of missing data will be completed and appropriately imputed using multiple imputation methods [65].

Our primary outcome is appropriate weight gain in pregnancy, which is based on prepregnancy BMI and includes weekly weight gain and total weight gain recommendations. Total weight gain at birth will be categorized as above, below, or within the Institute of Medicine guidelines [5,33]. Multinomial logistic regression analysis will be used to compare the likelihood of falling above, within, or below guidelines for total weight gain in pregnancy across arms after adjusting for potential confounders such as age, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and household characteristics. Confounders will be identified through significant findings in bivariate analysis comparing the three groups and by consideration of variables based on prior scientific evidence. Summary statistics of key time-dependent measures and other non–time-dependent measures will also be included as covariates. Modification of the study arm effect by key variables will be investigated through interaction terms in the regression model.

The trajectory of weight gain behavior, using each week’s categorized weight gain (within guidelines vs not), will additionally be assessed as the outcome in a clustered logistic regression model fit using a generalized linear mixed model framework. The study arm is the primary between-participant factor, while time (week) is the main within-participant covariate. The interaction term between time and arm is also a factor of interest, as it will allow us to assess changes in weight gain behaviors over time between study arms. A random participant-level intercept will account for within-participant clustering, and a random slope for time will be investigated to account for additional between-participant variability. Additional covariates and effect modifiers included in these regression models will be chosen using the same methods as before.

Our secondary outcome is diet quality as measured by the HEI score based on two ASA24 measurements at baseline and in the second and third trimesters [51,66]. A comparison of overall HEI scores between study arms will be carried out using separate linear mixed models with calculated HEI scores from each trimester as the outcome. As before, the study arm will be the primary between-participant factor; time, as measured by trimester, the within-participant covariate; and the interaction between arm and time will be assessed to measure the difference in trimester effect between the arms. Random participant-level intercepts and slopes for time will assess the deviation from the overall average and account for any within-participant clustering. Models will be adjusted for additional confounders and covariates, determined as in prior models. Fruit and vegetable intake, as well as other macronutrient details, will also be evaluated.

Prenatal complications, delivery complications, and birth weight (small/large for gestational age) are also secondary outcomes that will be assessed. Comparison of the proportion of participants with complications between study arms will be analyzed using a logistic regression model in a manner analogous to the primary outcome of appropriate weight gain in pregnancy.

The end-of-study interview transcripts will be analyzed using standard qualitative techniques [67-69]. Two investigators will review all transcripts, create memos of major concepts present, and iteratively develop a codebook. Transcripts will be coded and major themes and conclusions determined by consensus. Themes identified from these transcripts will describe participants’ satisfaction or dissatisfaction with delivery, perceived impact of food delivery on their health and diet, and other challenges/barriers to healthy behaviors during pregnancy. The interviews will be used to provide context and narrative to inform findings from quantitative outcome data, and will be used in dissemination to tell the participants’ perspective regarding the impact of grocery delivery.

Finally, we will conduct a cost analysis focused on costs from the payer perspective during the pregnancy period. All costs will be adjusted to current dollars and will represent average cost per participant. Our analysis will estimate the costs of delivering the intervention, including cost of grocery delivery service, increased costs for WIC due to increased redemption of food benefits [70], print and online media advertisements to maximize uptake, costs to train WIC staff on new procedures, and increased WIC visit time to allow staff to educate beneficiaries. Medical records data will also be used to identify the number and type of all medical care used by participants during pregnancy, including prenatal care visits, specialist visits and consultations, emergency department visits, inpatient care, and delivery care. The average total health care costs per participant associated with each arm of the trial will be calculated using nationally representative health care expenditure data from the most recent Medical Expenditure Panel Survey [71]. Although medical records data from their usual sources of care may not include visits to urgent care and outside facilities, this will not likely introduce bias due to randomization to study arms.


This study was funded in April 2021, data collection started in December 2021, and data collection is expected to be concluded in 2026. No results are available as of manuscript preparation.


This protocol describes a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether grocery delivery of healthy WIC-approved foods supports healthy pregnancy weight gain for young pregnant women with low income. We will additionally evaluate if the grocery delivery impacts diet quality, pregnancy complications, and delivery outcomes. We anticipate that the young pregnant women in the two intervention groups will have better rates of appropriate pregnancy weight gain, improved diet quality, and lower rates of pregnancy and delivery complications.

Results from this study can be used to inform United States Department of Agriculture policies on online use of WIC benefits as well as to provide evidence about the cost-effectiveness of national implementation of grocery delivery for WIC beneficiaries [32]. These outcomes may additionally provide evidence to clinical practices or health systems on opportunities for the use of food delivery programs within their patient populations to address social determinants of health.

There are several key strengths to this protocol. This work uses a low-cost well-established service to enhance an existing government program which enables the results to inform policies to improve the implementation of WIC services and other programs for vulnerable populations. COVID-19 has also led to a surge in online grocery ordering, which enhances the generalizability of this study [31]. Additionally, this study uses low-burden communication and data collection methods to allow for high levels of participant retention.

Limitations of this study are that it does not perfectly emulate the real-life application of integrating grocery delivery into WIC services, as study personnel are ordering and managing the delivery process, which reduces the generalizability of the results to program-based implementation. Specifically, participants request the groceries from the study team who then place the orders and manage the deliveries. Additionally, participants are able to access and use their WIC food benefits in addition to groceries provided, and it does not directly replace this benefit.

Ultimately, this study will provide rigorous evidence regarding the impact of grocery delivery of healthy foods and unsweetened beverages among pregnant young women with low income and their infants. The findings from this study will provide invaluable information about the potential benefits of incorporating grocery delivery in WIC and about the costs to implement, sustain, and expand such a program.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

Peer Review Report from the Community-Level Health Promotion (CLHP) Study Section - Healthcare Delivery and Methodologies Integrated Review Group - Center For Scientific Review (National Institutes of Health, USA).

PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 149 KB

  1. Sedgh G, Finer LB, Bankole A, Eilers MA, Singh S. Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: levels and recent trends. J Adolesc Health 2015 Feb;56(2):223-230 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Fertility of women in the United States: 2016. United States Census Bureau. 2016.   URL: https://census.gov/data/tables/2016/demo/fertility/women-fertility.html#par_list_59 [accessed 2022-07-15]
  3. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK. Births: Provisional data for 2021. Vital Statistics Rapid Release; no 20. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2022 May.   URL: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr020.pdf [accessed 2022-07-15]
  4. Harper LM, Chang JJ, Macones GA. Adolescent pregnancy and gestational weight gain: do the Institute of Medicine recommendations apply? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 Aug;205(2):140.e1-140.e8 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Institute of Medicine. In: Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.
  6. Groth SW, Holland ML, Kitzman H, Meng Y. Gestational weight gain of pregnant African American adolescents affects body mass index 18 years later. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2013;42(5):541-550 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Chang T, Moniz MH, Plegue MA, Sen A, Davis MM, Villamor E, et al. Characteristics of women age 15-24 at risk for excess weight gain during pregnancy. PLoS One 2017;12(3):e0173790 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Joseph NP, Hunkali KB, Wilson B, Morgan E, Cross M, Freund KM. Pre-pregnancy body mass index among pregnant adolescents: gestational weight gain and long-term post partum weight retention. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2008 Aug;21(4):195-200. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Siega-Riz AM, Viswanathan M, Moos M, Deierlein A, Mumford S, Knaack J, et al. A systematic review of outcomes of maternal weight gain according to the Institute of Medicine recommendations: birthweight, fetal growth, and postpartum weight retention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009 Oct;201(4):339.e1-339.14. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Oken E, Rifas-Shiman S, Field A, Frazier A, Gillman M. Maternal gestational weight gain and offspring weight in adolescence. Obstet Gynecol 2008 Nov;112(5):999-1006 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Nehring I, Schmoll S, Beyerlein A, Hauner H, von Kries R. Gestational weight gain and long-term postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2011 Nov;94(5):1225-1231. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Fraser A, Tilling K, Macdonald-Wallis C, Hughes R, Sattar N, Nelson S, et al. Associations of gestational weight gain with maternal body mass index, waist circumference, and blood pressure measured 16 y after pregnancy: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Am J Clin Nutr 2011 Jun;93(6):1285-1292 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  13. Gould Rothberg BE, Magriples U, Kershaw TS, Rising SS, Ickovics JR. Gestational weight gain and subsequent postpartum weight loss among young, low-income, ethnic minority women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 Jan;204(1):52.e1-52.11 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Viswanathan M, Siega-Riz A, Moos M, Deierlein A, Mumford S, Knaack J, et al. Outcomes of maternal weight gain. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2008 May(168):1-223. [Medline]
  15. Sridhar SB, Darbinian J, Ehrlich SF, Markman MA, Gunderson EP, Ferrara A, et al. Maternal gestational weight gain and offspring risk for childhood overweight or obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 Sep;211(3):259.e1-259.e8 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008. Am J Public Health 2014 Feb;104 Suppl 1:S43-S48. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2012. National vital statistics reports; vol 62 no 3. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2013 Sep.   URL: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr62/nvsr62_03.pdf [accessed 2022-07-15]
  18. Goodrich K, Cregger M, Wilcox S, Liu J. A qualitative study of factors affecting pregnancy weight gain in African American women. Matern Child Health J 2013 Apr;17(3):432-440 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. Herring SJ, Henry TQ, Klotz AA, Foster GD, Whitaker RC. Perceptions of low-income African-American mothers about excessive gestational weight gain. Matern Child Health J 2012 Dec;16(9):1837-1843 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Pereira MA, Rifas-Shiman SL, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards JW, Peterson KE, Gillman MW. Predictors of change in physical activity during and after pregnancy: Project Viva. Am J Prev Med 2007 Apr;32(4):312-319 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Abu-Saad K, Fraser D. Maternal nutrition and birth outcomes. Epidemiol Rev 2010;32:5-25. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  22. Shin D, Bianchi L, Chung H, Weatherspoon L, Song WO. Is gestational weight gain associated with diet quality during pregnancy? Matern Child Health J 2014 Aug;18(6):1433-1443. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Danielewicz H, Myszczyszyn G, Dębińska A, Myszkal A, Boznański A, Hirnle L. Diet in pregnancy-more than food. Eur J Pediatr 2017 Dec;176(12):1573-1579 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Borge TC, Aase H, Brantsæter AL, Biele G. The importance of maternal diet quality during pregnancy on cognitive and behavioural outcomes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2017 Sep 24;7(9):e016777 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Lenders CM, McElrath TF, Scholl TO. Nutrition in adolescent pregnancy. Curr Opin Pediatr 2000 Jun;12(3):291-296. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Kim SA, Moore LV, Galuska D, Wright AP, Harris D, Grummer-Strawn LM, et al. Vital signs: fruit and vegetable intake among children — United States, 2003–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014 Aug 05.   URL: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6331a3.htm?s_cid=mm6331a3_w#Tab1 [accessed 2022-07-15]
  27. Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Trends in the prevalence of obesity and dietary behaviors: National YRBS: 1991—2017. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.   URL: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/trends/2017_obesity_trend_yrbs.pdf [accessed 2022-07-15]
  28. Iannotti RJ, Wang J. Patterns of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and diet in U.S. adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2013 Aug;53(2):280-286 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  29. Gamba RJ, Leung CW, Petito L, Abrams B, Laraia BA. Sugar sweetened beverage consumption during pregnancy is associated with lower diet quality and greater total energy intake. PLoS One 2019;14(4):e0215686 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Garcia K. Not all shoppers want groceries delivered. eMarketer. 2018 Oct 23.   URL: https://www.emarketer.com/content/not-all-shoppers-want-groceries-delivered [accessed 2022-07-15]
  31. Shen H, Namdarpour F, Lin J. Investigation of online grocery shopping and delivery preference before, during, and after COVID-19. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect 2022 Jun;14:100580 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  32. WIC Online Ordering Grant. Center for Nutrition.   URL: https://www.centerfornutrition.org/wic-online-ordering [accessed 2022-07-18]
  33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 548: weight gain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013 Jan;121(1):210-212. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. WIC: Nutrition Services Standards. USDA Food and Nutrition Service. 2016 Aug.   URL: https:/​/wicworks.​fns.usda.gov/​sites/​default/​files/​media/​document/​wic-nutrition-services-standards_0.​pdf [accessed 2022-07-15]
  35. WIC program nutrition education guidance. USDA Food and Nutrition Service.   URL: https://wicworks.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/document/ntredguidance.pdf [accessed 2022-07-15]
  36. Michigan WIC Food Guide: healthy habits, healthy families. State of Michigan.   URL: https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdch/Food_Guide_FINAL_English_437204_7.pdf [accessed 2022-07-15]
  37. Nicholson LM, Slater SJ, Chriqui JF, Chaloupka F. Validating adolescent socioeconomic status: comparing school free or reduced price lunch with community measures. Spatial Demogr 2015 May 14;2(1):55-65. [CrossRef]
  38. Measures with evidence of reliability and validity. National Collaborative on Childhood Obesity Research.   URL: https:/​/www.​nccor.org/​tools-mruserguides/​food-environment/​measures-with-evidence-of-reliability-and-validity/​#physical [accessed 2022-07-15]
  39. Fulkerson JA, Nelson MC, Lytle L, Moe S, Heitzler C, Pasch KE. The validation of a home food inventory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008 Nov 04;5:55 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  40. Council on Community Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition. Promoting food security for all children. Pediatrics 2015 Nov;136(5):e1431-e1438. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  41. Hager E, Quigg A, Black M, Coleman S, Heeren T, Rose-Jacobs R, et al. Development and validity of a 2-item screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity. Pediatrics 2010 Jul;126(1):e26-e32. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  42. BodyTrace.   URL: https://www.bodytrace.com/medical/ [accessed 2022-07-15]
  43. Krukowski RA, Hare ME, Talcott GW, Johnson KC, Richey PA, Kocak M, et al. Dissemination of the Look AHEAD intensive lifestyle intervention in the United States Air Force: study rationale, design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials 2015 Jan;40:232-239 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  44. Madigan CD, Jolly K, Roalfe A, Lewis AL, Webber L, Aveyard P, et al. Study protocol: the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a brief behavioural intervention to promote regular self-weighing to prevent weight regain after weight loss: randomised controlled trial (The LIMIT Study). BMC Public Health 2015 Jun 04;15:530 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  45. Ross KM, Wing RR. Concordance of in-home "Smart" scale measurement with body weight measured in-person. Obes Sci Pract 2016 Jun;2(2):224-248 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  46. Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24®) Dietary Assessment Tool. National Cancer Institute.   URL: https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/asa24/ [accessed 2022-07-15]
  47. Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Mittl B, Zimmerman TP, Thompson FE, Bingley C, et al. The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24): a resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012 Aug;112(8):1134-1137 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  48. Hughes AR, Summer SS, Ollberding NJ, Benken LA, Kalkwarf HJ. Comparison of an interviewer-administered with an automated self-administered 24 h (ASA24) dietary recall in adolescents. Public Health Nutr 2017 Dec;20(17):3060-3067. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  49. Kirkpatrick S, Guenther P, Douglass D, Zimmerman T, Kahle L, Atoloye A, et al. The provision of assistance does not substantially impact the accuracy of 24-hour dietary recalls completed using the automated self-administered 24-h dietary assessment tool among women with low incomes. J Nutr 2019 Jan 01;149(1):114-122 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  50. Singh A, Trumpff C, Genkinger J, Davis A, Spann M, Werner E, et al. Micronutrient dietary intake in Latina pregnant adolescents and its association with level of depression, stress, and social support. Nutrients 2017 Nov 04;9(11):1212 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  51. Healthy Eating Index. Food and Nutrition Service: US Department of Agriculture.   URL: https://www.fns.usda.gov/resource/healthy-eating-index-hei [accessed 2022-07-15]
  52. Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 650: physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 2015 Dec;126(6):e135-e142. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  53. Brener ND, Kann L, Shanklin S, Kinchen S, Eaton DK, Hawkins J, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Methodology of the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System--2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2013 Mar 01;62(RR-1):1-20 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  54. YRBSS frequently asked questions. Adolescent and School Health.: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   URL: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/faq.htm [accessed 2022-07-15]
  55. 2019 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.   URL: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/2019/2019_YRBS-National-HS-Questionnaire.pdf [accessed 2022-07-15]
  56. 2010 National Youth Physical Activity and Nutrition Survey: Data Users Manual. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.   URL: https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/data/yrbs/nypans/nypans_data_users_manual.pdf [accessed 2022-07-15]
  57. Pulvers K, Bachand J, Nollen N, Guo H, Ahluwalia JS. BMI-based norms for a culturally relevant body image scale among African Americans. Eat Behav 2013 Dec;14(4):437-440 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  58. Padgett J, Biro FM. Different shapes in different cultures: body dissatisfaction, overweight, and obesity in African-American and caucasian females. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2003 Dec;16(6):349-354. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  59. Kass AE, Theim Hurst K, Kolko RP, Ruzicka EB, Stein RI, Saelens BE, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the youth eating disorder examination questionnaire in children with overweight or obesity. Int J Eat Disord 2017 Jul;50(7):776-780 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  60. Goldschmidt AB, Doyle AC, Wilfley DE. Assessment of binge eating in overweight youth using a questionnaire version of the Child Eating Disorder Examination with Instructions. Int J Eat Disord 2007 Jul;40(5):460-467 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  61. Gideon N, Hawkes N, Mond J, Saunders R, Tchanturia K, Serpell L. Development and psychometric validation of the EDE-QS, a 12 item short form of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). PLoS One 2016;11(5):e0152744 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  62. NHANES 2017-2018 Questionnaire Instruments. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.   URL: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/questionnaires.aspx?BeginYear=2017 [accessed 2022-07-15]
  63. Wolfson JA, Lahne J, Raj M, Insolera N, Lavelle F, Dean M. Food agency in the United States: associations with cooking behavior and dietary intake. Nutrients 2020 Mar 24;12(3):877 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  64. Wolfson JA, Smith KC, Frattaroli S, Bleich SN. Public perceptions of cooking and the implications for cooking behaviour in the USA. Public Health Nutr 2016 Jun;19(9):1606-1615. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  65. Rubin DB, Schenker N. Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some applications. Stat Med 1991 Apr;10(4):585-598. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  66. Steps for calculating HEI scores. National Cancer Institute: Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences.   URL: https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/hei/calculating-hei-scores.html [accessed 2022-07-15]
  67. Hennink M, Hutter I, Bailey A. Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage; 2010.
  68. Saldana J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage; 2015.
  69. Ulin P, Robinson E, Tolley E. Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
  70. Fiscal Year 2010 WIC Food Cost Report. Urban Institute. 2013 Aug.   URL: https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/WICFoodCost2010.pdf [accessed 2022-07-15]
  71. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.   URL: https://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/data_overview.jsp [accessed 2022-07-15]


ASA24: Automated Self-Administered 24-hour
HEI: Healthy Eating Index
SSB: sugar-sweetened beverage
WIC: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children


Edited by T Leung; This paper was peer reviewed by the Community-Level Health Promotion (CLHP) Study Section - Healthcare Delivery and Methodologies Integrated Review Group - Center For Scientific Review (National Institutes of Health, USA). See the Multimedia Appendix for the peer-review report;submitted 01.07.22; accepted 12.07.22; published 05.08.22

Copyright

©Marika Waselewski, Melissa Plegue, Kendrin Sonneville, Ken Resnicow, Aisha Ghumman, Cara Ebbeling, Elham Mahmoudi, Ananda Sen, Julia A Wolfson, Tammy Chang. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 05.08.2022.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.