This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-randomized Protocols and Methods (ehealth) (571) Symptom Checkers (32) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (485) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (729) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (870) Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth (988) Participatory Research Protocols and Proposals (142)

Published on in Vol 11, No 5 (2022): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/34026, first published .
Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Symptom Checker Apps in Primary Health Care (CHECK.APP): Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Mixed Methods Study

Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Symptom Checker Apps in Primary Health Care (CHECK.APP): Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Mixed Methods Study

Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Symptom Checker Apps in Primary Health Care (CHECK.APP): Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Mixed Methods Study

Authors of this article:

Anna-Jasmin Wetzel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Roland Koch1 Author Orcid Image ;   Christine Preiser2 Author Orcid Image ;   Regina Müller3 Author Orcid Image ;   Malte Klemmt4 Author Orcid Image ;   Robert Ranisch5 Author Orcid Image ;   Hans-Jörg Ehni3 Author Orcid Image ;   Urban Wiesing3 Author Orcid Image ;   Monika A Rieger2 Author Orcid Image ;   Tanja Henking4 Author Orcid Image ;   Stefanie Joos1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (8) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Müller R, Klemmt M, Ehni H, Henking T, Kuhnmünch A, Preiser C, Koch R, Ranisch R. Ethical, legal, and social aspects of symptom checker applications: a scoping review. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2022;25(4):737 View
  2. You Y, Tsai C, Li Y, Ma F, Heron C, Gui X. Beyond Self-diagnosis: How a Chatbot-based Symptom Checker Should Respond. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 2023;30(4):1 View
  3. Radionova N, Ög E, Wetzel A, Rieger M, Preiser C. Impacts of Symptom Checkers for Laypersons’ Self-diagnosis on Physicians in Primary Care: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e39219 View
  4. Peven K, Wickham A, Wilks O, Kaplan Y, Marhol A, Ahmed S, Bamford R, Cunningham A, Prentice C, Meczner A, Fenech M, Gilbert S, Klepchukova A, Ponzo S, Zhaunova L. Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2023;11:e46718 View
  5. Müller R, Klemmt M, Koch R, Ehni H, Henking T, Langmann E, Wiesing U, Ranisch R. “That’s just Future Medicine” - a qualitative study on users’ experiences of symptom checker apps. BMC Medical Ethics 2024;25(1) View
  6. Wetzel A, Koch R, Koch N, Klemmt M, Müller R, Preiser C, Rieger M, Rösel I, Ranisch R, Ehni H, Joos S. ‘Better see a doctor?’ Status quo of symptom checker apps in Germany: A cross-sectional survey with a mixed-methods design (CHECK.APP). DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  7. Preiser C, Radionova N, Ög E, Koch R, Klemmt M, Müller R, Ranisch R, Joos S, Rieger M. The Doctors, Their Patients, and the Symptom Checker App: Qualitative Interview Study With General Practitioners in Germany. JMIR Human Factors 2024;11:e57360 View
  8. Wetzel A, Preiser C, Müller R, Joos S, Koch R, Henking T, Haumann H. Unveiling Usage Patterns and Explaining Usage of Symptom Checker Apps: Explorative Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e55161 View