Published on in Vol 11, No 3 (2022): March

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/34275, first published .
Creating Effective, Evidence-Based Video Communication of Public Health Science (COVCOM Study): Protocol for a Sequential Mixed Methods Effect Study

Creating Effective, Evidence-Based Video Communication of Public Health Science (COVCOM Study): Protocol for a Sequential Mixed Methods Effect Study

Creating Effective, Evidence-Based Video Communication of Public Health Science (COVCOM Study): Protocol for a Sequential Mixed Methods Effect Study

Journals

  1. Williams N, Haines T, Williams C, Bowles K, Hill K. Age Differences in Preferred Methods of Obtaining and Understanding Health Related Information During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia. Frontiers in Public Health 2022;10 View
  2. Berg S, Shortt M, Røislien J, Lungu D, Thune H, Wiig S, Andreu-Sánchez C. Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge. PLOS ONE 2022;17(9):e0275316 View
  3. Berg S, Shortt M, Thune H, Røislien J, O’Hara J, Lungu D, Wiig S. Differences in comprehending and acting on pandemic health risk information: a qualitative study using mental models. BMC Public Health 2022;22(1) View
  4. Lungu D, Røislien J, Berg S, Smeets I, Shortt M, Thune H, Brønnick K. Assessing the Effect of Nonvisual Information Factors in Pandemic-Related Video Communication: Randomized Controlled Between-Subjects Experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e42528 View
  5. Lungu D, Røislien J, Smeets I, Wiig S, Brønnick K. Individual Characteristics in the Comprehension of Pandemic Video Communication: Randomized Controlled Between-Subjects Design. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e48882 View