Published on 08.06.18 in Vol 7, No 6 (2018): June
Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at http://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9220, first published Oct 19, 2017.
Individually Tailored, Adaptive Intervention to Manage Gestational Weight Gain: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Women With Overweight and Obesity
Background: High gestational weight gain is a major public health concern as it independently predicts adverse maternal and infant outcomes. Past interventions have had only limited success in effectively managing pregnancy weight gain, especially among women with overweight and obesity. Well-designed interventions are needed that take an individualized approach and target unique barriers to promote healthy weight gain.
Objective: The primary aim of the study is to describe the study protocol for Healthy Mom Zone, an individually tailored, adaptive intervention for managing weight in pregnant women with overweight and obesity.
Methods: The Healthy Mom Zone Intervention, based on theories of planned behavior and self-regulation and a model of energy balance, includes components (eg, education, self-monitoring, physical activity/healthy eating behaviors) that are adapted over the intervention (ie, increase in intensity) to better regulate weight gain. Decision rules inform when to adapt the intervention. In this randomized controlled trial, women are randomized to the intervention or standard care control group. The intervention is delivered from approximately 8-36 weeks gestation and includes step-ups in dosages (ie, Step-up 1 = education + physical activity + healthy eating active learning [cooking/recipes]; Step-up 2 = Step-up 1 + portion size, physical activity; Step-up 3 = Step-up 1 + 2 + grocery store feedback, physical activity); 5 maximum adaptations. Study measures are obtained at pre- and postintervention as well as daily (eg, weight), weekly (eg, energy intake/expenditure), and monthly (eg, psychological) over the study period. Analyses will include linear mixed-effects models, generalized estimating equations, and dynamical modeling to understand between-group and within-individual effects of the intervention on weight gain.
Results: Recruitment of 31 pregnant women with overweight and obesity has occurred from January 2016 through July 2017. Baseline data have been collected for all participants. To date, 24 participants have completed the intervention and postintervention follow-up assessments, 3 are currently in progress, 1 dropped out, and 3 women had early miscarriages and are no longer active in the study. Of the 24 participants, 13 women have completed the intervention to date, of which 1 (8%, 1/13) received only the baseline intervention, 3 (23%, 3/13) received baseline + step-up 1, 6 (46%, 6/13) received baseline + step-up 1 + step-up 2, and 3 (23%, 3/13) received baseline + step-up 1 + step-up 2 +step-up 3. Data analysis is still ongoing through spring 2018.
Conclusions: This is one of the first intervention studies to use an individually tailored, adaptive design to manage weight gain in pregnancy. Results from this study will be useful in designing a larger randomized trial to examine efficacy of this intervention and developing strategies for clinical application.
Registered Report Identifier: RR1-10.2196/9220
JMIR Res Protoc 2018;7(6):e150
- adaptive intervention;
- randomized controlled trial;
- intervention study;
- pregnant women;
- nutrition science;
- gestational weight gain;
- body weight maintenance
Crowdfunding campaign to support this specific research
We help JMIR researchers to raise funds to pursue their research and development aimed at tackling important health and technology challenges. If you would like to show your support for this author, please donate using the button below. The funds raised will directly benefit the corresponding author of this article (minus 8% admin fees). Your donations will help this author to continue publishing open access papers in JMIR journals. Donations of over $100 may also be acknowledged in future publications.
Suggested contribution levels: $20/$50/$100
Maternal weight gain in pregnancy is necessary for healthy fetal development . The Institute of Medicine [ ] recommends that appropriate weight gain for normal weight women is 25-35 pounds, whereas weight gain for overweight (15-25 pounds) and obese (11-20 pounds) women is less; any weight above these upper guidelines is considered excessive or high. High gestational weight gain (GWG) is strongly related to and independently predicts adverse pregnancy outcomes (eg, preterm delivery, gestational diabetes, and pre-eclampsia), greater adiposity, postpartum weight retention, and long-term obesity and cardiovascular disease [ , ]. Maternal obesity and high GWG also elevate infant risks such as macrosomia and early onset of obesity and diabetes [ ]. As GWG is a modifiable factor that can be targeted to reduce adverse risks, managing GWG is critical for the mother, and can influence the etiology of obesity for offspring at a crucial time in the life cycle. However, over 50% of women enter pregnancy as already overweight (body mass index, BMI, 25-29.9 kg/m2) or obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) [ ], and nearly 60% of women with overweight/obesity gain more weight in pregnancy than that recommended by the Institute of Medicine [ ], which suggests they have particular challenges with managing their weight.
Past randomized intervention trials have shown that behavioral interventions can effectively manage weight in pregnant women [- ] when they “mirror” effective programs in nonpregnant women such as using calorie goals, frequent contact and weight and dietary intake monitoring, and promoting healthy eating and exercise behaviors [ - ]. However, the effectiveness of these interventions has mainly been demonstrated in normal weight women. The results of studies including women with overweight and obesity are mixed. Several studies found little to no effect on GWG [ , , - ], whereas other interventions observed some effects [ , ] but were based on older guidelines [ ] that were less restrictive than the current guidelines [ ]. One study using current guidelines found a significant reduction in GWG (23 pounds) among women with obesity participating in a lifestyle intervention group compared with the 30 pound gain in the control group [ ]. Both groups, however, exceeded the Institute of Medicine GWG guidelines [ ]. In short, women with overweight and obesity have unique challenges with managing weight that may likely require a more intensive and tailored approach than what is traditionally delivered in usual prenatal care or has been tested in past interventions.
One strategy that has been used to facilitate behavior change in other areas (eg, mental health issues, child behaviors, weight loss) [- ] is an adaptive intervention (also known as a dynamic treatment regime or adaptive treatment strategy) [ , ]. In an adaptive intervention, a sequence of intervention strategies or dosages is tailored to an individual’s needs (similar to clinical practice) as opposed to a “one size fits all” intervention approach [ ]. Adaptive interventions include critical decision points (eg, which intervention to start with, when and how to measure signs of response or nonresponse), intervention components (eg, set of intervention options at each critical decision point), tailoring variables (eg, variables expected to impact the effect of the component), and decision rules (eg, links tailoring variables to the intervention components) [ ]. Moreover, principles of control systems engineering can be applied to an intervention context by using decision algorithms (controllers) to regulate a dynamical system to optimize intervention outcomes [ ]. For example, control systems engineering can be used to construct and estimate a dynamical model that considers how changes in an outcome (eg, weight) are related to planned and self-regulatory behaviors (eg, dietary intake, physical activity) over time. An intervention that helps each pregnant woman with overweight and obesity to control GWG on a weekly basis and adapts to her unique needs over the course of pregnancy may be a promising strategy for managing weight in pregnancy. However, we are not aware of prior research that has used this intervention approach to manage weight gain in pregnancy.
The primary aim of this publication is to describe the study protocol for Healthy Mom Zone, an individually tailored, adaptive intervention for managing weight in pregnant women with overweight and obesity. We will explain the conceptual framework, theoretical components, intervention dosages, and decision rules for how and when to adapt the intervention. We then describe the intensive longitudinal data collection procedures and the methods for conducting poststudy participant interviews to examine program compliance, dosage exposure, and participant responsiveness. We will also explain the plan to establish initial validation of the intervention by examining impacts of the program on GWG (ie, average weekly GWG of intervention vs control group; meeting individual GWG goals based on prepregnancy weight status), energy intake, physical activity, planned self-regulatory behaviors, and related maternal health outcomes. This work aims to use principles of control systems engineering to optimize the intervention for future application; in other words, to inform how the intervention can effectively and efficiently manage GWG in pregnant women with overweight and obesity.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This study has been approved by the Pennsylvania State University Institutional Review Board (Study #00000122) and Clinical Research Center (#319). All legal and data protection issues are discussed with the responsible authorities, and all participants are required to provide active informed consent.
Overview of Healthy Mom Zone Study Design
The intervention is currently being tested in a longitudinal study design among a cohort of pregnant women with overweight and obesity randomized to either the intervention or control group from approximately 8-36 weeks gestation.summarizes the flow of participants through the study using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials template [ ]. Study measures are obtained at baseline, throughout the course of the intervention (eg, daily, weekly, and monthly), and at follow up (see ). GWG is evaluated weekly and decision rules are used in 3-4 week cycles to decide when and how the intervention may be adapted for an individual. The decision to evaluate GWG in 3-4 week cycles was based on the following: (1) clinical insight and judgment (eg, prenatal care visits for most women occur in 3-4 week cycles, so we used the same cycle for our GWG evaluations), (2) reducing participant burden (eg, the 3-4 week cycle allowed women to adjust to the dosages before adaptations are made), and (3) being proactive about adjusting the intervention dosage in real-time before a woman’s weight exceeds her goal. In addition, mHealth tools are used to allow participants to self-monitor behaviors (ie, weight, physical activity, dietary intake). The study staff can review the data collected from the monitors and provide the participants with real-time feedback to facilitate compliance (eg, contact participants when the devices are not working or not being used according to the study protocol). All participants are compensated for their time spent on completing the study measures (receive gift cards and cash for pre- and postmeasures); women participating in the intervention do not have to return their Wi-Fi weight and food scales. We will use the data collected in this study and dynamical modeling from control systems engineering (system identification) to express progression of GWG over time. We will identify a customized intervention plan for each woman based on her energy intake, physical activity, planned and self-regulatory behaviors, and the extent to which she is meeting GWG goals over pregnancy. This will lead to final intervention modifications and result in an individually tailored, adaptive and optimized intervention, of which we will test efficacy in a future randomized controlled trial.
|Weight and weight gain||High Precision Stand-On Adult Scale||X||X||X|
|FitBit Aria Wi-Fi Smart Scale||X||X|
|Adiposity||Air-Displacement Plethysmography (BODPOD) Body Composition||X||X||X|
|Healthy eating behaviors||MyFitnessPal Phone App||X|
|3-Factor Eating Questionnaire||X||X||X|
|Remote food photography||X||X|
|Physical activity behaviors||Actigraph (time spend in moderate-intensity activity)||X||X||X|
|Jawbone Wrist-Worn Activity Monitor||X||X||X||X|
|Physical activity log (mode and min activity)||X|
|Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire||X||X||X|
|Weight attitude||Palmer attitudes toward weight in pregnancy||X||X||X|
|Healthy eating and exercise motivational determinants||Attitude, subjective norm, perceived control, intention||X||X||X|
|Healthy eating and exercise beliefs||X||X||X|
|Self-Regulation Questionnaire (self-regulatory function)||X||X||X|
|Sociodemographic||Health history Questionnaire||X|
|Self-efficacy||Sui Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scales||X||X||X|
|Clark Weight Efficacy Scale||X||X||X|
|Sleep behaviors||Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index||X||X||X|
|Jawbone Wrist-Worn Activity Monitor||X||X||X||X|
|Psychosocial||Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale||X||X||X|
|State Trait Anxiety Inventory||X||X||X||X|
|Body Areas Satisfaction Scale||X||X||X|
|Perceived Stress Scale||X||X||X|
|Pregnancy Figure Rating Scale||X||X||X|
|Rothbart Adult Temperament Scale||X|
|Stress||Urine cortisol collection||X||X||X||X|
|Fetal Growth||Standard fetal ultrasound scans||X|
Participants and Sample Size
The target sample for this intervention is 30 pregnant women with overweight and obesity (BMI range 25-45 kg/m2; >40 kg/m2 with physician consultation); singleton pregnancy >8 weeks gestation; English-speaking; residing in or near Centre County, Pennsylvania; and with physician consent to participate. On the basis of our past research [, ], this group compromises >85% of live births in Central Pennsylvania. Exclusion criteria are multiple gestation, diabetes at study entry, not overweight or obese, severe allergies or dietary restrictions, contraindications to prenatal physical activity [ ], and not residing in area for duration of the study. The primary outcome of our study is GWG. Julious [ ] effectively argues a sample size of 12 per group is adequate to assess feasibility and obtain sufficient precision of the mean and variance to perform a formal sample size and power calculation for a future larger randomized control trial with GWG as the primary outcome. With 24 participants (12 per group), we will have 80% statistical power to detect a standardized effect size (difference between 2 group means divided by SD) for GWG of 1.2 using a 2-sided test with significance level of P=.05. Factoring in participant dropout (conservative estimate of 25% based on our pilot work [ , ] and past research [ ]), we will recruit 30 participants (15 intervention, 15 control).
Recruitment, Assignment, and Allocation
Women are recruited using on-site clinic, community-based, and Web-based strategies. At the clinic, nurses identify potential eligible women and refer them to a study staff member who is ready in the waiting room to speak with them about the study and, if interested, screen them for eligibility. Community-based recruitment includes hanging study flyers at local businesses, churches, campus, and community centers. Web-based recruitment occurs through the study website  and Facebook ads. Interested women call a toll-free number. A project staff member explains the study, obtains verbal assent to ask questions, and determines eligibility based on the inclusion criteria described above. Pregnant women with overweight and obesity are recruited between 8 and 12 weeks gestation and randomized to the intervention or control condition until about 36 weeks gestation. The study biostatisticians developed a randomization scheme using variable size, random permuted blocks to ensure the number of participants in each group is balanced after each set of B randomized participants, where B is the block size. Randomization to intervention (n=15) or control (n=15) groups uses 1:1 allocation; participants are entered consecutively. When a woman is eligible and informed consent is signed, a staff member requests randomization by a unique participant identification number.
We used principles from the Theory of Planned Behavior  and self-regulation [ ] for the conceptual framework of the Healthy Mom Zone Intervention ( ).
The Theory of Planned Behavior assumes a person is motivated for a behavior (eg, managing GWG) when she has a positive attitude, believes that significant others want her to do the behavior (subjective norm), and has the perceived ability to do the behavior (perceived behavioral control) . Self-regulation assumes that behavior is goal-directed and regulated by feedback control processes [ ]. The participant engages in activities in which she can succeed, and this confidence in performance success can influence her perceived behavioral control. Thus, self-monitoring is a core strategy of behavior modification and a key aspect of the dynamical systems model to manage GWG in this study. The overall simulation model for GWG is depicted in and includes the following: (1) a 2-compartment energy balance model predicting changes in body mass as a result of energy intake and physical activity, (2) 2 Theory of Planned Behavior models describing how energy intake and physical activity are affected by behavioral variables, (3) a program delivery module relating magnitude and duration of components to inflows of the Theory of Planned Behavior models, and (4) 2 self-regulation units modeling how success expectancies in the intervention influence one’s goal achievement motivation [ , ]. This model serves a vital role in evaluating the decision rules in the individually tailored intervention and in applying advanced strategies to produce decision frameworks for making program adaptations.
Healthy Mom Zone Intervention Components
The intervention components (see) are informed by past research and our own pilot data [ - , , , , ]. Evidence from model lifestyle interventions [ - , ], GWG interventions [ - ], and our research on promoting healthy behaviors [ - ] shows education, goal-setting and action planning, and self-monitoring can effectively manage weight. Our past studies have shown that when people are taught how to set appropriate plans and goals, self-monitor, and manage their time, they are more likely to achieve their goals and see positive behavioral outcomes (eg, engage in healthy eating and exercise to manage weight) [ , - ]. Furthermore, convincing evidence from past research [ , , - ] shows that healthy eating and physical activity active learning (eg, active participation in strategies to reduce energy density such as food preparation and planning, portion size control, increasing intake of fruits and vegetables, meeting physical activity goals, and engaging in guided exercise sessions) are effective for lowering energy intake and managing body weight. We also learned from our pilot study [ ] that women wanted to know more about how the target intervention behaviors (eg, weight, physical activity, dietary intake) were related to their baby’s growth, so we developed brief modules to inform women about the following: (1) current research studies (Featured Evidence and Baby’s Health) and (2) unique aspects of their baby’s growth (Baby Fun Facts); content is delivered weekly in this study via email.
Standard of Care Control Condition
All women in the study receive standard prenatal care (eg, regular visits and prenatal counseling with health care provider; provider is not informed by the research team of randomization assignment). The women randomly assigned to the control condition also complete the same measurement protocol as the intervention participants, which includes daily, weekly, and monthly assessments (see).
Healthy Mom Zone Intervention Description
Women randomized to the intervention group receive the baseline dosage, which includes for all women the intervention components (described above) of education, goal-setting and action plans, featured evidence on baby’s health, baby fun facts, and self-monitoring. Participants meet weekly with a study dietitian and are given customized calorie goals and a booklet developed for this study that contain customized healthy eating plans, recipes, and tailored meals to meet calorie goals. They are also given a physical activity booklet with customized and safe pregnancy-related exercises (see). A study staff member reviews each woman’s weight, physical activity, and dietary intake via real-time data collection procedures and generates a report for the study dietitian to review with the participant at the next intervention session.
The dietitian plots weekly GWG using individualized charts that illustrate GWG within the context of the Institute of Medicine guidelines and discusses strategies to overcome barriers to managing weight and engaging in healthy eating and physical activity behaviors. Women in the intervention also complete a 15-min postintervention exit interview at their post assessment to provide their feedback and perspective on multiple aspects of their intervention experience (eg, likes and dislikes about using the mHealth tools, adaptive dosages, active learning activities, completing study measures). Intervention sessions are randomly audio-recorded and coded for fidelity.
Study Setting and Procedures
All participants, regardless of intervention assignment, complete the same study measurement protocol. The study setting includes onsite visits at the Penn State Clinical Research Center (University Park campus) and at-home participation. Interested and eligible women complete a preintervention assessment at the Penn State Clinical Research Center after the study is described and written consent is obtained. A study clinician assesses height, weight, blood pressure, and conducts a physical exam to identify health symptoms that may preclude study participation . Women complete self-reported measures of their healthy eating/physical activity behaviors, knowledge, planned and self-regulatory behaviors, motivational determinants, demographics, and dietary intake using onsite paper and pencil and Web-based data capture software (Research Electronic Data Capture) [ ].
Women then complete an air displacement plethysmography body composition assessment following a standardized protocol that takes approximately 30 min. Participants complete these same measures again at the postassessment at approximately 36 weeks gestation. In addition, during the course of the study all women are given a Wi-Fi scale for wireless uploading of daily weight, food scale to monitor daily intake, and log to record food and beverages (and amounts) consumed, and 2 monitors (wrist-worn activity monitor worn daily; waist-worn accelerometer worn in 2-week cycles) to track physical activity. Participants are asked to use these mHealth devices continuously over the course of the entire study. Women track dietary intake on 2 weekdays and 1 weekend using a mobile phone app. Measures are obtained at baseline, during the intervention (daily, weekly, and monthly), and postintervention. All participants are compensated up to US $420 in check or gift card for the pre and post, weekly, and monthly assessments over the study period. In addition, the intervention participants get to keep their Wi-Fi weight and food scales at the end of the study (control participants return them), and they receive a US $20 check if they attend 90% (25/28) or more of the intervention sessions.
Decision Rules and Adapting the Intervention Dosage
A set of decision rules were developed to evaluate GWG that are based on the Institute of Medicine GWG guidelines (ie, overweight=15-25 pounds; obese=11-20 pounds) , our own research [ , , ], and clinical insight that inform when and how to adapt the components. A computerized applet is used to plot women’s weight against individual weight gain trajectories with lower and upper bounds for the GWG guidelines [ , ]; GWG is evaluated weekly and the values are compared with average weekly weight ranges for overweight (eg, 0.5-0.7 pounds) and obese (eg, 0.4-0.6 pounds) women [ ]; these weekly weights are then evaluated in 3-4 week cycles to determine if and when the intervention dosage should be adapted (see ). The rationale for adapting the dosages is based on each woman’s self-regulatory abilities to manage GWG. For example, if the woman is within her GWG goal (ie, weekly weight gain ranges according to the Institute of Medicine guidelines) [ ], she will continue to receive the same level of the intervention for the next cycle as she is adequately self-regulating her weight with the amount of intervention dosage that she’s receiving. However, if she is exceeding her GWG goal, the intervention is adapted (ie, dosage is stepped up). That is, she continues to receive the baseline intervention, but then she receives additional active learning components (eg, step-up 1 with cooking and grocery store demonstrations; onsite exercise session led by an instructor) to help better self-regulate her weight. If she exceeds her GWG goal at the next evaluation cycle, the intervention will be adapted again (ie, baseline + step-up 1 + step-up 2) with other active learning components (eg, portion size and containers; second onsite exercise session with instructor) added to provide more intensive intervention assistance and supportive control to better manage GWG. This evaluation process continues over the course of her pregnancy until the end of the intervention (ie, around 36 weeks gestation) and/or a maximum of 5 possible dosage increases (see ). The sequencing of the adaptive dosages was determined during pilot testing by examining combinations of active learning strategies with good user acceptability, and we identified the maximum number of dosage increases that resulted in “too much intervention burden” and led to participant dropout (ie, more than 5 adaptations) [ ]. If a participant is under her GWG goal [ ] and/or any safety concerns emerge (eg, complication such as anemia, fetal issue), we consult with the study obstetrician who makes recommendations on if and/or how intervention dosage changes should be made.
The measurement protocol is presented above in. The primary outcome measure is GWG. Weight and GWG are assessed pre- and postintervention at the Penn State Clinical Research Center using standardized procedures (eg, measured in duplicate to nearest kilogram using a high-precision stand-on adult scale; wearing undergarments and gown) and daily at home using the Wi-Fi wireless scale. Secondary outcomes include adiposity (body composition), healthy eating behaviors, physical activity behaviors, knowledge, motivational determinants, self-regulation, psychological well-being, sleep, serum blood for macronutrients, stress (cortisol), metabolism, and fetal growth.
Data on the primary and secondary outcome variables above are collected in addition to participant sociodemographic characteristics (eg, age, BMI status) to understand the influence of potential moderators on the primary and secondary outcome variables. Standardized procedures were developed for data collection, recording of errors, and a comprehensive data quality assurance program to ensure complete, accurate, and valid data while limiting variability in data recording. Study data are managed using a secure Web app that provides user-friendly Web-based case reports, real-time data entry validation audit trails, and a deidentified data export mechanism to commonly used statistical packages.
To establish initial validation of the intervention, contrasts constructed from linear mixed-effects models  will be used to assess differences between the intervention and control groups with respect to changes in continuous outcomes over time (from pre- to postintervention): changes in primary (GWG, energy intake, physical activity, planned/self-regulatory behaviors) and secondary outcomes (serum blood biomarkers, adiposity, knowledge). Linear mixed-effects models are an extension of ordinary regression models that account for within-subject variability inherent in longitudinal studies. Generalized estimating equations [ ] with a logit link will be used to assess differences between the intervention and control groups with respect to dichotomous outcomes over time. If deemed necessary, confounding variables (eg, prepregnancy weight, age, obstetric complications) will be included as covariates. With respect to the participants meeting individual GWG goals based on prepregnancy BMI status [ ], we will look at each woman and determine whether she met her GWG goal. We will code participants as “0” for GWG within goal, +1 for GWG over goal, and −1 for GWG under goal. A chi-square test will be used to assess differences between the intervention and control groups on this 3-level ordinal variable (ie, −1,0,1) assessing individual GWG goals. All hypothesis tests will be 2-sided, and analyses will be performed using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) or R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Modeling development and simulation are done in Matlab with SIMULINK (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA). Functional data analysis modeling for time-varying modeling will rely on SAS. Weight predictions based on a first-principles energy balance model can be performed using measurements of a participant’s energy expenditure (physical activity and resting metabolic rate) and energy intake. Alternatively, energy intake can be estimated from the energy balance model using the measured weight gain and physical activity, which can then be compared with self-reported data [, ]; this information can be used by dieticians to provide informative health guidance. Intensive measurements of the Theory of Planned Behavior constructs are used to build participant-based dynamical models using semiphysical model identification techniques. The integration of these behavioral models with energy balance models can be used to evaluate and implement decision policies based on control systems engineering for an intensively adaptive intervention, specifically Hybrid Model Predictive Control [ , ].
The targeted sample of pregnant women with overweight and obesity has been successfully recruited between January 13, 2016, and July 1, 2017. Baseline data have been collected for all participants. To date, 24 participants have completed the study and postintervention follow-up assessments, 3 are currently in progress, 1 dropped out, and 3 women had early miscarriages and are no longer active in the study.
Of the 24 participants, 13 women have completed the intervention to date, of which 1 (8%, 1/13) received only the baseline intervention, 3 (23%, 3/13) received baseline + step-up 1, 6 (46.1%, 6/13) received baseline + step-up 1 + step-up 2, and 3 (23%, 3/13) received baseline + step-up 1 + step-up 2 + step-up 3.
Preliminary results are presented infor 1 participant who is overweight and was randomized to the intervention group (from gestational age day 85 through day 261). As shown in , her actual weight remained within that recommended by the Institute of Medicine [ ], whereas under-reporting is observed in her self-reported energy intake compared with a back-calculation method based on our maternal energy balance model ([ ]; see reference for more detailed explanation of the back-calculation method). Using the back-calculated energy intake for weight prediction, the model-predicted weight follows closely to her measured weight. Data analysis is still ongoing through spring 2018.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that is testing the feasibility of an individually tailored, adaptive intervention to manage GWG in pregnant women with overweight and obesity. This intervention, Healthy Mom Zone, aims to improve upon past interventions by addressing gaps in the literature, specifically among pregnant women with overweight and obesity, by providing a more individually tailored and adaptive approach to effectively manage weight gain during pregnancy. Although this intervention was deliberately intensive to understand if this approach can effectively manage GWG, future plans for this line of research will explore how the Healthy Mom Zone Intervention can be further adapted to women’s individual needs.
For example, we may learn from the study findings that some women can effectively manage their GWG with less intervention, and therefore, we can step down the intervention for them, whereas other women need the step up to keep their weight within their goals. This approach will also increase the clinical application and utility of the intervention.
Strengths and Limitations
There are several positive features of this study. This study has strong public health relevance and clinical significance for the future management of GWG. We have also incorporated several innovative aspects into the study, including the use of (1) novel decision rules to choose when and how to adapt the intervention, (2) mHealth tools for self-monitoring of behaviors and real-time data collection to provide feedback to the participants, and (3) a unique computerized applet to generate individualized weight gain trajectories for comparing actual weight to the Institute of Medicine guidelines. In addition, customized eating and physical activity plans developed for this study aid in reducing participant barriers to engaging in healthy behaviors during pregnancy. Moreover, the intensive longitudinal data collection protocol allows for a myriad of systems approaches in support of implementing and evaluating intensively adaptive interventions [, - ]. Intensive data collection enables the application of system identification and state estimation approaches from engineering that, in turn, build comprehensive dynamical models for GWG used in adaptive intervention optimization. These methods can be used to estimate and correct energy intake over time, despite some missing data.
There are also some limitations of this research. The small sample size, although adequate for examination of the primary outcome (GWG), precludes the ability to make assumptions at a population level. Moreover, the target population is a homogenous sample of women from largely rural and suburban areas in Central Pennsylvania, thus limiting the extension of the study findings to more culturally diverse and urban populations of pregnant women with overweight and obesity. We do plan to understand the application of Healthy Mom Zone to a more diverse sample of pregnant women in the future, including those who are normal weight, more culturally diverse, and reside in varied communities across the United States.
The data and knowledge obtained from this innovative intervention will be valuable for informing future studies aiming to manage GWG in pregnancy. We aim to learn from the study findings how to further adapt the intervention (eg, step up or down) to meet women’s needs and customize the intervention based on women’s individual characteristics. For example, we may learn that certain individual characteristics (eg, higher perceived behavioral control, lower stress) help women to self-regulate their weight better, and therefore, we can expand the intervention to better target these factors at the start of a pregnancy. The insight gained from this study as well as independent developments in mHealth tools and their use in clinical practice (eg, links to electronic records and provider communication) will also help to disseminate this individually tailored, adaptive intervention to effectively manage GWG in clinical practice—so that all pregnant women can be targeted to ultimately improve maternal and infant health outcomes and impact the etiology of obesity at a critical time in the life cycle.
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of the Healthy Mom Zone team, the OBGYN staff at Mount Nittany Physician Group, and the staff at the Pennsylvania State (University Park campus) Clinical Research Center who assisted with participant recruitment and data collection for this study. The authors would also like to acknowledge the collaborative contributions of Dr Linda Collins to the study’s methodological design, Drs Richard Legro and Jaimey Pauli for their clinical oversight, and Lindsey Hess for contributions to the study’s data collection protocol. Support for this work has been provided by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health through grant 1 R01 HL119245-01. This project was also supported by the Penn State Clinical & Translational Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University CTSA, NIH and NCATS Grant Number UL1 TR000127 and UL1 TR002014. The content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or NCATS.
Conflicts of Interest
Multimedia Appendix 1
Study booklets with customized healthy eating and physical activity material.PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 222KB
Multimedia Appendix 2
Illustration of the decision rule for GWG evaluation and adapting dosages.PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 68KB
Multimedia Appendix 3
Illustration of Healthy Mom Zone Intervention adaptive intervention design.PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 73KB
Multimedia Appendix 4
CONSORT-EHEALTH checklist (V 1.6.1).PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 715KB
- National Research Council, Institute of Medicine, Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Food and Nutrition Board, Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. In: Yaktine AL, Rasmussen KM, editors. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2009.
- Pirkola J, Pouta A, Bloigu A, Miettola S, Hartikainen AL, Järvelin MR, et al. Prepregnancy overweight and gestational diabetes as determinants of subsequent diabetes and hypertension after 20-year follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010 Feb;95(2):772-778. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Mission JF, Marshall NE, Caughey AB. Pregnancy risks associated with obesity. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2015 Jun;42(2):335-353. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Graham ML, Strawderman MS, Demment M, Olson CM. Does Usage of an eHealth Intervention Reduce the Risk of Excessive Gestational Weight Gain? Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2017 Jan 09;19(1):e6 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Phelan S, Phipps MG, Abrams B, Darroch F, Schaffner A, Wing RR. Randomized trial of a behavioral intervention to prevent excessive gestational weight gain: the Fit for Delivery Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2011 Apr;93(4):772-779 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Redman LM, Gilmore LA, Breaux J, Thomas DM, Elkind-Hirsch K, Stewart T, et al. Effectiveness of SmartMoms, a Novel eHealth Intervention for Management of Gestational Weight Gain: Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017 Sep 13;5(9):e133 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Phelan S, Jankovitz K, Hagobian T, Abrams B. Reducing excessive gestational weight gain: lessons from the weight control literature and avenues for future research. Womens Health (Lond) 2011 Nov;7(6):641-661. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care 2002 Dec;25(12):2165-2171 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
- Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, Knowler WC, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Christophi CA, Hoffman HJ, et al. 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1677-1686 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wadden TA, West DS, Neiberg RH, Wing RR, Ryan DH, Johnson KC, Look AHEAD Research Group. One-year weight losses in the Look AHEAD study: factors associated with success. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009 Apr;17(4):713-722 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Vinter CA, Jensen DM, Ovesen P, Beck-Nielsen H, Jørgensen JS. The LiP (Lifestyle in Pregnancy) study: a randomized controlled trial of lifestyle intervention in 360 obese pregnant women. Diabetes Care 2011 Dec;34(12):2502-2507 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Jeffries K, Shub A, Walker SP, Hiscock R, Permezel M. Reducing excessive weight gain in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust 2009 Oct 19;191(8):429-433. [Medline]
- Opie RS, Neff M, Tierney AC. A behavioural nutrition intervention for obese pregnant women: Effects on diet quality, weight gain and the incidence of gestational diabetes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2016 Aug;56(4):364-373. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Thornton YS. Preventing excessive weight gain during pregnancy through dietary and lifestyle counseling: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2009 Jul;114(1):173; author reply 173-173; author reply 174. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wolff S, Legarth J, Vangsgaard K, Toubro S, Astrup A. A randomized trial of the effects of dietary counseling on gestational weight gain and glucose metabolism in obese pregnant women. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008 Mar;32(3):495-501. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Institute of Medicine. Nutrition During Pregnancy: Part I: Weight Gain, Part II: Nutrient Supplements. In: Institue of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
- Bogaerts AF, Devlieger R, Nuyts E, Witters I, Gyselaers W, Van den Bergh BR. Effects of lifestyle intervention in obese pregnant women on gestational weight gain and mental health: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obes (Lond) 2013 Jun;37(6):814-821. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Almirall D, Compton SN, Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Duan N, Murphy SA. Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy. Stat Med 2012 Jul 30;31(17):1887-1902 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Bierman KL, Nix RL, Maples JJ, Murphy SA, Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Examining clinical judgment in an adaptive intervention design: The fast track program. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006 Jun;74(3):468-481 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Kidwell KM, Hyde LW. Adaptive Interventions and SMART Designs: Application to child behavior research in a community setting. Am J Eval 2016 Sep;37(3):344-363 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lavori PW, Dawson R. Dynamic treatment regimes: practical design considerations. Clin Trials 2004 Feb;1(1):9-20. [Medline]
- Dawson R, Lavori PW. Placebo-free designs for evaluating new mental health treatments: the use of adaptive treatment strategies. Stat Med 2004 Nov 15;23(21):3249-3262. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Collins LM, Murphy SA, Bierman KL. A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prev Sci 2004 Sep;5(3):185-196 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
- Lei H, Nahum-Shani I, Lynch K, Oslin D, Murphy SA. A “SMART” design for building individualized treatment sequences. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2012;8:21-48 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Rivera DE, Pew MD, Collins LM. Using engineering control principles to inform the design of adaptive interventions: a conceptual introduction. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007 May;88(Suppl 2):S31-S40 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol 2010 May;115(5):1063-1070. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Hillemeier MM, Downs DS, Feinberg ME, Weisman CS, Chuang CH, Parrott R, et al. Improving women's preconceptional health: findings from a randomized trial of the Strong Healthy Women intervention in the Central Pennsylvania women's health study. Womens Health Issues 2008;18(6 Suppl):S87-S96 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Weisman CS, Hillemeier MM, Downs DS, Feinberg ME, Chuang CH, Botti JJ, et al. Improving women's preconceptional health: long-term effects of the Strong Healthy Women behavior change intervention in the central Pennsylvania Women's Health Study. Womens Health Issues 2011;21(4):265-271 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- ACOG Committee Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee opinion. Number 267, January 2002: exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 2002 Jan;99(1):171-173. [Medline]
- Julios SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 2005;4(4):287-291.
- Downs DS, DiNallo J, Rauff E, Ulbrecht J, Birch L, Paul I. Pregnant women's exercise motivation and behavior: Preliminary findings from a randomized physical activity intervention. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2010;32:S157-S158.
- Downs D. Determinants and outcomes of physical activity in pregnancy: Findings from Active MOMS, a randomized physical activity intervention for pregnant women. Ann Behav Med 2011;41:S135.
- Downs D. Healthy Mom Zone. URL: https://sites.psu.edu/healthymomzonestudy/ [accessed 2018-01-11] [WebCite Cache]
- Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991 Dec;50(2):179-211.
- Carver CS, Scheier MF. On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
- Dong Y, Rivera DE, Thomas DM, Navarro-Barrientos JE, Downs DS, Savage JS, et al. A Dynamical Systems Model for Improving Gestational Weight Gain Behavioral Interventions. Proc Am Control Conf 2012:4059-4064 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
- Dong Y, Rivera DE, Downs DS, Savage JS, Thomas DM, Collins LM. Hybrid Model Predictive Control for Optimizing Gestational Weight Gain Behavioral Interventions. Proc Am Control Conf 2013:1970-1975 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
- Look Ahead Research Group, Bray G, Gregg E, Haffner S, Pi-Sunyer XF, WagenKnecht LE, et al. Baseline characteristics of the randomised cohort from the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) study. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2006 Dec;3(3):202-215 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Downs DS, Dinallo JM, Birch LL, Paul IM, Ulbrecht JS. Randomized Face-to-Face vs. Home Exercise Interventions in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes. Psychol Sport Exerc 2017 May;30:73-81. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Symons Downs D, Hausenblas H. Exercising during pregnancy and postpartum: An Elicitation study using the framework of the theory of planned behavior. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004;49:A.
- Downs DS, Savage JS, Rauff EL. Falling Short of Guidelines? Nutrition and Weight Gain Knowledge in Pregnancy. J Womens Health Care 2014;3:pii: 1000184 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Symons Downs D, Singer R. Goal setting and implementation intentions: Preliminary support for increasing exercise behavior. J Hum Mov Studies 2004;45:419-432.
- Singer R, Downs DS, Bouchard L, de la Pena D. The influence of a process versus an outcome orientation on tennis performance and knowledge. J Sport Behav 2001;24(2):213-222.
- Downs DS, Feinberg M, Hillemeier MM, Weisman CS, Chase GA, Chuang CH, et al. Design of the Central Pennsylvania Women's Health Study (CePAWHS) strong healthy women intervention: improving preconceptional health. Matern Child Health J 2009 Jan;13(1):18-28 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Downs DS, Devlin CA, Rhodes RE. The Power of Believing: Salient Belief Predictors of Exercise Behavior in Normal Weight, Overweight, and Obese Pregnant Women. J Phys Act Health 2015 Aug;12(8):1168-1176 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, Jebb SA, Lewis HB, Wei Y, et al. Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 Sep 14(9):CD011045 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ledikwe JH, Rolls BJ, Smiciklas-Wright H, Mitchell DC, Ard JD, Champagne C, et al. Reductions in dietary energy density are associated with weight loss in overweight and obese participants in the PREMIER trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2007 May;85(5):1212-1221 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
- Ello-Martin JA, Roe LS, Ledikwe JH, Beach AM, Rolls BJ. Dietary energy density in the treatment of obesity: a year-long trial comparing 2 weight-loss diets. Am J Clin Nutr 2007 Jun;85(6):1465-1477 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
- Savage JS, Marini M, Birch LL. Dietary energy density predicts women's weight change over 6 y. Am J Clin Nutr 2008 Sep;88(3):677-684 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
- Symons Downs D, Savage JS, Rivera DE, Leonard KS, Pauley AM, Hohman EE, et al. Influence of a feasibility study on the design of an individually-tailored, adaptive intervention to manage weight in overweight and obese pregnant women. Ann Behav Med 2017;51:S1451-S1452. [CrossRef]
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009 Apr;42(2):377-381 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Thomas DM, Navarro-Barrientos JE, Rivera DE, Heymsfield SB, Bredlau C, Redman LM, et al. Dynamic energy-balance model predicting gestational weight gain. Am J Clin Nutr 2012 Jan;95(1):115-122 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Sanghvi A, Redman LM, Martin CK, Ravussin E, Hall KD. Validation of an inexpensive and accurate mathematical method to measure long-term changes in free-living energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr 2015 Aug;102(2):353-358 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Laird NM, Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982 Dec;38(4):963-974. [Medline]
- Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986 Apr 01;73(1):13-22 [FREE Full text]
- Guo P, Rivera DE, Downs DS, Savage JS. Semi-physical Identification and State Estimation of Energy Intake for Interventions to Manage Gestational Weight Gain. Proc Am Control Conf 2016 Jul;2016:1271-1276 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Guo P, Rivera DE, Savage JS, Downs DS. State Estimation Under Correlated Partial Measurement Losses: Implications for Weight Control Interventions. Proc IFAC World Congress 2017 Jul;50(1):13532-13537 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Rivera DE, Hekler EB, Savage JS, Symons Downs D. Intensively adaptive interventions using control systems engineering: Two illustrative examples in Advanced topics in the optimization of behavioral and biobehavioral interventions. In: Collins LM, Kugler KC, editors. Optimization of Behavioral, Biobehavioral, and Biomedical Interventions. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2019.
|BMI: body mass index|
|EI: energy intake|
|GWG: gestational weight gain|
|INT: intervention participant|
|PA: physical activity|
|TPB: Theory of Planned Behavior|
Edited by C Hoving; submitted 19.10.17; peer-reviewed by K Heron, T Chang; comments to author 17.11.17; revised version received 16.01.18; accepted 06.04.18; published 08.06.18
©Danielle Symons Downs, Jennifer S Savage, Daniel E Rivera, Joshua M Smyth, Barbara J Rolls, Emily E Hohman, Katherine M McNitt, Allen R Kunselman, Christy Stetter, Abigail M Pauley, Krista S Leonard, Penghong Guo. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 08.06.2018.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.