This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Formative Studies and eHealth/mHealth Development (525)

Published on in Vol 7, No 10 (2018): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/11278, first published .
Co-Designing an eHealth Service for the Co-Care of Parkinson Disease: Explorative Study of Values and Challenges

Co-Designing an eHealth Service for the Co-Care of Parkinson Disease: Explorative Study of Values and Challenges

Co-Designing an eHealth Service for the Co-Care of Parkinson Disease: Explorative Study of Values and Challenges

Authors of this article:

Åsa Revenäs1 Author Orcid Image ;   Helena Hvitfeldt Forsberg1 Author Orcid Image ;   Emma Granström1 Author Orcid Image ;   Carolina Wannheden1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (19) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Journals

  1. Bird M, Ouellette C, Whitmore C, Li L, Nair K, McGillion M, Yost J, Banfield L, Campbell E, Carroll S. Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research. Health Expectations 2020;23(3):523 View
  2. Vandekerckhove P, de Mul M, Bramer W, de Bont A. Generative Participatory Design Methodology to Develop Electronic Health Interventions: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e13780 View
  3. Wannheden C, Revenäs Å. How People with Parkinson's Disease and Health Care Professionals Wish to Partner in Care Using eHealth: Co-Design Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e19195 View
  4. Cowdell F, Dyson J, Sykes M, Dam R, Pendleton R. How and how well have older people been engaged in healthcare intervention design, development or delivery using co‐methodologies: A scoping review with narrative summary. Health & Social Care in the Community 2022;30(2):776 View
  5. Lindblom S, Flink M, Elf M, Laska A, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals. Health Expectations 2021;24(3):905 View
  6. Sanz M, Acha B, García M. Co-Design for People-Centred Care Digital Solutions: A Literature Review. International Journal of Integrated Care 2021;21(2) View
  7. Valdez R, Lyon S, Wellbeloved-Stone C, Collins M, Rogers C, Cantin-Garside K, Gonclaves Fortes D, Kim C, Desai S, Keim-Malpass J, Kushalnagar R. Engaging the disability community in informatics research: rationales and practical steps. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2022;29(11):1989 View
  8. Béland S, Lambert M, Delahunty‐Pike A, Howse D, Schwarz C, Chouinard M, Aubrey‐Bassler K, Burge F, Doucet S, Danish A, Dumont‐Samson O, Bisson M, Luke A, Macdonald M, Gaudreau A, Porter J, Rubenstein D, Sabourin V, Scott C, Warren M, Wilhelm L, Hudon C. Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study. Health Expectations 2022;25(5):2365 View
  9. Grindell C, Coates E, Croot L, O’Cathain A. The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 2022;22(1) View
  10. Guglietti B, Hobbs D, Wesson B, Ellul B, McNamara A, Drum S, Collins-Praino L. Development and Co-design of NeuroOrb: A Novel “Serious Gaming” System Targeting Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson’s Disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2022;14 View
  11. Stümpel J, van Munster M, Grosjean S, Pedrosa D, Mestre T. Coping Styles in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: Consideration in the Co-Designing of Integrated Care Concepts. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2022;12(6):921 View
  12. Ayobi A, Stawarz K, Katz D, Marshall P, Yamagata T, Santos-Rodriguez R, Flach P, O'Kane A. Co-Designing Personal Health? Multidisciplinary Benefits and Challenges in Informing Diabetes Self-Care Technologies. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2021;5(CSCW2):1 View
  13. Nordin A, Kjellstrom S, Robert G, Masterson D, Areskoug Josefsson K. Measurement and outcomes of co-production in health and social care: a systematic review of empirical studies. BMJ Open 2023;13(9):e073808 View
  14. Biezen R, Roberts C, Buising K, Thursky K, Boyle D, Lau P, Clark M, Manski-Nankervis J. How do general practitioners access guidelines and utilise electronic medical records to make clinical decisions on antibiotic use? Results from an Australian qualitative study. BMJ Open 2019;9(8):e028329 View
  15. Younas A. Epistemic inclusion is necessary for diverse, global, and meaningful research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2024;171:111385 View
  16. Alrayshouni Z, Dayekh A, El‐Tassi A, Pakai A. Rationalizing the Influence of Co‐Design on Distress, Clinical Decision‐Making and Disease Self‐Management of Cancer Patients‐as‐Partners: A Quasi‐Experimental Study. Health Expectations 2024;27(3) View
  17. Clay P, Walton T, Malin E, Hutchinson M, Levitt K, Williams C, Crouch H, Beeke S, Bloch S. Better conversations with Parkinson’s: co-production of a novel speech and language therapy intervention with people living with Parkinson’s. Research for All 2024;8(1) View
  18. McCaffrey L, McCann B, Giné-Garriga M, An Q, Cardon G, Chastin S, Chrifou R, Lippke S, Loisel Q, Longworth G, Messiha K, Vogelsang M, Whyte E, Dall P. Co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts: A Health CASCADE scoping review. Public Health 2025;238:29 View