Explore our sister journals here.

Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 18.01.17 in Vol 6, No 1 (2017): January

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Assessing the Efficacy of an App-Based Method of Family Planning: The Dot Study Protocol"

Rebecca G Simmons, Dominick C Shattuck, Victoria H Jennings

JMIR Res Protoc 2017 (Jan 18); 6(1):e5 

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/resprot.6886):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Peragallo Urrutia R, Polis CB, Jensen ET, Greene ME, Kennedy E, Stanford JB. Effectiveness of Fertility Awareness–Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2018;132(3):591
    CrossRef
  2. Händel P, Wahlström J. Digital contraceptives based on basal body temperature measurements. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 2019;52:141
    CrossRef
  3. Bull JR, Rowland SP, Scherwitzl EB, Scherwitzl R, Danielsson KG, Harper J. Real-world menstrual cycle characteristics of more than 600,000 menstrual cycles. npj Digital Medicine 2019;2(1)
    CrossRef
  4. Ali R, Gürtin ZB, Harper JC. Do fertility tracking apps offer women useful information about their fertile window?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2020;
    CrossRef
  5. Shattuck D, Haile LT, Simmons RG. Lessons From the Dot Contraceptive Efficacy Study: Analysis of the Use of Agile Development to Improve Recruitment and Enrollment for mHealth Research. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(4):e99
    CrossRef
  6. Jennings V, Haile LT, Simmons RG, Spieler J, Shattuck D. Perfect- and typical-use effectiveness of the Dot fertility app over 13 cycles: results from a prospective contraceptive effectiveness trial. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 2019;24(2):148
    CrossRef
  7. Said A, Ganso M, Freudewald L, Schulz M. Trends in dispensing oral emergency contraceptives and safety issues: a survey of German community pharmacists. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 2019;41(6):1499
    CrossRef
  8. Bull J, Rowland S, Lundberg O, Berglund-Scherwitzl E, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Trussell J, Scherwitzl R. Typical use effectiveness of Natural Cycles: postmarket surveillance study investigating the impact of previous contraceptive choice on the risk of unintended pregnancy. BMJ Open 2019;9(3):e026474
    CrossRef
  9. Sohda S, Suzuki K, Igari I. Relationship Between the Menstrual Cycle and Timing of Ovulation Revealed by New Protocols: Analysis of Data from a Self-Tracking Health App. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(11):e391
    CrossRef
  10. Gnoth C, Bachmann N, Görner K. Was leisten neue Technologien zur Zyklusüberwachung?. gynäkologie + geburtshilfe 2018;23(5):38
    CrossRef
  11. Karasneh RA, Al-Azzam SI, Alzoubi KH, Muflih SM, Hawamdeh SS. Smartphone Applications for Period Tracking: Rating and Behavioral Change among Women Users. Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2020;2020:1
    CrossRef
  12. Webb S, Cheng A, Simmons R, Peragallo Urrutia R, Jennings V, Witt J. A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Health Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Around Fertility Awareness-Based Methods in Title X Clinics in the United States. Women's Health Reports 2020;1(1):354
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/resprot.6886):

  1. Raith-Paula E, Frank-Herrmann P. Natürliche Familienplanung heute. 2020. Chapter 14:207
    CrossRef