This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-Randomized Studies (funded, eHealth) (73) Mobile Health (mhealth) (1608) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (1971)

Published on in Vol 6, No 1 (2017): January

Assessing the Efficacy of an App-Based Method of Family Planning: The Dot Study Protocol

Assessing the Efficacy of an App-Based Method of Family Planning: The Dot Study Protocol

Assessing the Efficacy of an App-Based Method of Family Planning: The Dot Study Protocol

Authors of this article:

Rebecca G Simmons 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Dominick C Shattuck 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Victoria H Jennings 1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (15) Tweetations (7) Metrics

Journals

  1. Peragallo Urrutia R, Polis C, Jensen E, Greene M, Kennedy E, Stanford J. Effectiveness of Fertility Awareness–Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2018;132(3):591 View
  2. Händel P, Wahlström J. Digital contraceptives based on basal body temperature measurements. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 2019;52:141 View
  3. Bull J, Rowland S, Scherwitzl E, Scherwitzl R, Danielsson K, Harper J. Real-world menstrual cycle characteristics of more than 600,000 menstrual cycles. npj Digital Medicine 2019;2(1) View
  4. Ali R, Gürtin Z, Harper J. Do fertility tracking applications offer women useful information about their fertile window?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2021;42(1):273 View
  5. Shattuck D, Haile L, Simmons R. Lessons From the Dot Contraceptive Efficacy Study: Analysis of the Use of Agile Development to Improve Recruitment and Enrollment for mHealth Research. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(4):e99 View
  6. Jennings V, Haile L, Simmons R, Spieler J, Shattuck D. Perfect- and typical-use effectiveness of the Dot fertility app over 13 cycles: results from a prospective contraceptive effectiveness trial. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 2019;24(2):148 View
  7. Said A, Ganso M, Freudewald L, Schulz M. Trends in dispensing oral emergency contraceptives and safety issues: a survey of German community pharmacists. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 2019;41(6):1499 View
  8. Bull J, Rowland S, Lundberg O, Berglund-Scherwitzl E, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Trussell J, Scherwitzl R. Typical use effectiveness of Natural Cycles: postmarket surveillance study investigating the impact of previous contraceptive choice on the risk of unintended pregnancy. BMJ Open 2019;9(3):e026474 View
  9. Sohda S, Suzuki K, Igari I. Relationship Between the Menstrual Cycle and Timing of Ovulation Revealed by New Protocols: Analysis of Data from a Self-Tracking Health App. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(11):e391 View
  10. Gnoth C, Bachmann N, Görner K. Was leisten neue Technologien zur Zyklusüberwachung?. gynäkologie + geburtshilfe 2018;23(5):38 View
  11. Karasneh R, Al-Azzam S, Alzoubi K, Muflih S, Hawamdeh S. Smartphone Applications for Period Tracking: Rating and Behavioral Change among Women Users. Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2020;2020:1 View
  12. Webb S, Cheng A, Simmons R, Peragallo Urrutia R, Jennings V, Witt J. A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Health Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Around Fertility Awareness-Based Methods in Title X Clinics in the United States. Women's Health Reports 2020;1(1):354 View
  13. Ford E, Peters A, Roman S, McLaughlin E, Beckett E, Sutherland J. A scoping review of the information provided by fertility smartphone applications. Human Fertility 2021:1 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Raith-Paula E, Frank-Herrmann P. Natürliche Familienplanung heute. View
  2. Acuna J. Female and Male Contraception. View