RefCheck Maintenance Notice

On Monday, December 3, 2018, from 16:00-18:00 EST, RefCheck will be undergoing maintenance. RefCheck is the process where, during copyediting, all references are extracted from the manuscript file, parsed, matched against various databases (eg, PubMed and CrossRef), and automatically corrected. For more information on RefCheck, please visit our Knowledge Base.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 08.07.16 in Vol 5, No 3 (2016): Jul-Sept

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Original Paper

    Telemedicine in Neonatal Home Care: Identifying Parental Needs Through Participatory Design

    1Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

    2Paediatric Department, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark

    3Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

    Corresponding Author:

    Kristina Garne, RN, MSc

    Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital

    Odense University Hospital

    Sdr. Boulevard 29

    Odense, 5000

    Denmark

    Phone: 45 29727770

    Fax:45 65911862

    Email:


    ABSTRACT

    Background: For the majority of preterm infants, the last weeks of hospital admission mainly concerns tube feeding and establishment of breastfeeding. Neonatal home care (NH) was developed to allow infants to remain at home for tube feeding and establishment of breastfeeding with regular home visits from neonatal nurses. For hospitals covering large regions, home visits may be challenging, time consuming, and expensive and alternative approaches must be explored.

    Objective: To identify parental needs when wanting to provide neonatal home care supported by telemedicine.

    Methods: The study used participatory design and qualitative methods. Data were collected from observational studies, individual interviews, and focus group interviews. Two neonatal units participated. One unit was experienced in providing neonatal home care with home visits, and the other planned to offer neonatal home care with telemedicine support. A total of 9 parents with preterm infants assigned to a neonatal home care program and 10 parents with preterm infants admitted to a neonatal unit participated in individual interviews and focus group interviews, respectively.

    Results: Three overall themes were identified: being a family, parent self-efficacy, and nurse-provided security. Parents expressed desire for the following: (1) a telemedicine device to serve as a “bell cord” to the neonatal unit, giving 24-hour access to nurses, (2) video-conferencing to provide security at home, (3) timely written email communication with the neonatal unit, and (4) an online knowledge base on preterm infant care, breastfeeding, and nutrition.

    Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of neonatal home care. NH provides parents with a feeling of being a family, supports their self-efficacy, and gives them a feeling of security when combined with nursing guidance. Parents did not request hands-on support for infant care, but instead expressed a need for communication and guidance, which could be met using telemedicine.

    JMIR Res Protoc 2016;5(3):e100

    doi:10.2196/resprot.5467

    KEYWORDS

    Crowdfunding campaign to support this specific research

    We help JMIR researchers to raise funds to pursue their research and development aimed at tackling important health and technology challenges. If you would like to show your support for this author, please donate using the button below. The funds raised will directly benefit the corresponding author of this article (minus 8% admin fees). Your donations will help this author to continue publishing open access papers in JMIR journals. Donations of over $100 may also be acknowledged in future publications.

    keyboard with crowdfunding key instead of enter key

    Suggested contribution levels: $20/$50/$100



    Introduction

    Overview

    Birth below 37 weeks of pregnancy requires admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), which can have long-term impacts on the family. A growing body of literature recognizes the importance of family-centered care (FCC) in the NICU [1]. However, having an infant in the NICU is still stressful because mothers have difficulty bonding with their infants and have feelings of not being a parent [2-3]; also, parents must divide their time between the NICU and home [4], especially when there are other children in the family [5]. For the majority of preterm infants, the last weeks in the NICU involve tube feeding and establishment of breastfeeding [4-5]. Establishment of breastfeeding is challenging, lasts several weeks, and cannot be accelerated because it depends on infant maturity [4-5]. Neonatal home care (NH) was developed to meet FCC requirements and optimize family conditions at this time [4,6-9]. NH allows infants to remain at home for tube feeding and establishment of breastfeeding [9]; this occurs with regular home visits from neonatal nurses until the infant can eat and gain weight without supplemental tube feeding, meeting criteria for discharge. NH seems to increase breastfeeding rates [8,10], increase parent self-confidence, support early family formation [11], and provide the benefits of FCC [9]. Thus, NH can provide a desirable transition from the NICU to home for preterm infants and their parents. However, for hospitals covering large regions, home visits may be challenging, time consuming, and expensive and alternative approaches must be explored. In the current health care environment, the need to reduce overall costs despite increasing admissions has led to treatments moving from the hospital to the home, and telemedicine provides a further opportunity to reduce costs [12]. Decreasing costs in the neonatal field is crucial [13-14] and early discharge is one approach. This study was the first to investigate whether telemedicine could provide a viable alternative to home visits. Despite little research on telemedicine in the neonatal field [15], one study has shown telemedicine to offer a communication platform between the NICU and the home and to provide parental satisfaction [6].

    Aim

    The aim of this study was to identify parental needs when preterm infants receive NH with telemedicine support.


    Methods

    Design

    User involvement in health care research is important [16], especially when developing new health technologies, such as telemedicine. Such involvement is imperative to ensure that these technologies meet the needs of the users [17-20]. This study employed a participatory design (PD) approach. PD is typically carried out in three phases [17-18]; this article reports on interviews and focus group interviews from Phase 1. The next steps will be to develop a telemedicine solution (Phase 2), addressing the needs identified in this study, and to implement that solution (Phase 3), which will be the topic of future papers.

    Setting and Participants

    Parents with preterm infants admitted to two NICUs (see Table 1)—Hvidovre Hospital (HH) and Hans Christian Andersen Children’s Hospital (HCA)—participated in this study (see Table 2). HH has experience in providing NH with home visits and HCA planned to offer NH with telemedicine support.

    Table 1. Characteristics of neonatal intensive care units involved in the study.
    View this table

    Data Collection

    Observational studies, individual interviews, and focus group interviews were conducted. The observational studies monitored the dynamic and actions during NH home visits, following recommendations from Spradley [21]. Based on the observational study, a semistructured interview guide inspired by Malterud [22] and Kvale [23] was developed to interview parents of preterm infants assigned to NH from the NICU at HH. These interviews aimed to identify parent experiences with NH and home visits, including the meeting content and meaning. The four themes of the interviews were as follows: home visits, parent self-efficacy, nutrition/breastfeeding, and family life. From December 2014 through January 2015, the first author (KG) interviewed parents in their homes while their preterm infants received NH.

    Parallel to the interviews, two focus group interviews were conducted with parents whose preterm infants were admitted to the NICU at HCA who fulfilled the inclusion criteria for NH, which were as follows: (1) stable infant without need to monitor vital signs, (2) minimum age equivalent of 34 weeks, and (3) tube feeding required. Both primiparous and multiparous parents were included in the focus group interviews. The focus group interviews aimed to identify norms, ideas, and practices [22]. Themes were as follows: the last weeks in the unit, nutrition/breastfeeding, and needs when receiving NH supported by telemedicine.

    The first (KG) and fourth (JC) authors led the focus group interviews. Field notes were taken by the fourth author (JC) during the interviews. All interviews were recorded and fully transcribed by the first author (KG). A total of 9 parents participated in an individual interview, and 10 parents participated in focus group interviews (see Table 2). Interviews lasted 34-70 minutes, and focus group interviews lasted 86-99 minutes.

    Analysis

    Interview data were analyzed using Malterud’s systematic text condensation [24], which consists of four steps (see Table 3) as follows: (1) read transcripts repeatedly to identify themes, (2) identify and code units of meaning, (3) identify subgroups of codes from step 2 and develop condensates from them, and (4) describe experiences based on the condensates [24]. To have multiple perspectives during the first process of the analysis, the first (KG) and second (AB) authors individually extracted themes from the individual interview and focus group interview transcripts. These themes were triangulated and a consensus was reached. The first author (KG) completed steps 2-4, and the final product was approved by all authors.

    Table 2. Demographic data for parents and infants (n=19).
    View this table
    Table 3. Example of the analytical processa.
    View this table

    Ethics

    According to the Declaration of Helsinki, respondents received written and oral information about the study and provided signed consent. They could withdraw consent at any time with no consequences for future treatment of themselves or their infants. The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (2008-58-0035). The study was presented to the local ethics committee, but their review was deemed to not be required by Danish law.


    Results

    Analysis of the individual interviews and focus group interviews identified the following three categories: being a family, parent self-efficacy, and nurse-provided security.

    Being a Family

    Parents expressed that the admission of their preterm infant to the NICU negatively affected being a new family, because they felt separated; only mothers were allowed to stay 24 hours per day with their infant. As one father stated, “Out here you are a part-time family and that’s the way it will be.” Many mothers were frustrated that their husbands could not spend the night, because they needed their support and wanted to share the experience.

    Parents felt that staying in the neonatal unit with a healthy preterm infant for tube feeding and establishment of breastfeeding was not necessary:

    It [establishment of breastfeeding] lasted for so long because everything went so slowly. We had been here for so long that we could do all the things the nurses did, so you felt you wasted your time and would have benefitted from being home.
    [Mother #6]

    Finally, parents felt trapped by the physical environment of the neonatal unit where strict hygiene rules required them to ask nurses for diapers, washcloths, and other basics required for infant care. This gave them a feeling of dependency on the nurses, which they disliked.

    Parents with a preterm infant assigned to NH expressed that the NH supported their perception of being a family. There were overall positive effects of NH, including a feeling of calm for the entire family. One father stated the following:

    Obviously, we can do our own things; we are not just sitting in the hospital. Now we can carry on, do what we want and get on with our lives.
    [Father #1]

    Parents were relieved to be in charge and not to have to adapt to hospital rules. For families with other children, NH allowed them to get back to being a normal family. For men, NH provided the opportunity to father their infants, becoming more familiar with their noises and cries, which they did not observe while their infants were in the hospital. One father stated the following:

    I had no time with my daughter [in the NICU] because when I got there, the time was so short that it was a lot of work for a one-hour visit. I’m now a dad rather than being a helper.

    Parent Self-Efficacy

    Parents with infants in the NICU felt that the constant presence of nurses negatively affected their decision making. When nurses entered the room to help the parents, it made parents doubt their competence instead of supporting their self-efficacy. One mother stated the following:

    Today, for example, when they [twins] needed a bath, a nurse came in and said, “Shouldn’t I help you?” It makes me insecure. Can’t I do that myself?

    Parents receiving NH experienced an increase in their self-efficacy by being at home and parent-infant bonding was further strengthened:

    Being home means that you bond with your child because when you are in the hospital among professionals, you get the feeling that they are more capable of caring for him, and that others are better at taking care of your child is a terrible feeling. Here at home, we are absolutely the best at caring for him, which gives us a totally different feeling.
    [Mother #2]

    Nurse-Provided Security

    Parents with infants in the NICU were happy with guidance from nurses when establishment of breastfeeding was prolonged. One mother stated the following:

    There has been someone [a nurse] that has guided me all the way and said that it was okay, that breastfeeding establishment takes time.
    [Mother #2]

    Nurses also provided parents with a reassurance of normality:

    I think it was important to know. Some kind of normality in such an abnormal situation.
    [Mother #1]

    Similarly, for parents of infants receiving NH, home visits from neonatal nurses gave them a feeling of security that the infant was doing fine:

    If she didn’t come, then I might look at him and say doesn’t his belly looks a little dilated? The way that a professional sees him and says he is doing fine, is so fantastic.
    [Mother #3]

    Frequent professional eyes on the infants reassured parents that their infant was developing normally. For this reason, the parents suggested the use of a telemedicine device to serve as a “bell cord,” giving 24-hour access to the neonatal unit. One father stated the following:

    A video connection would be good if we needed the nurse to see some red spots on the baby or help with the tube, but it could also be by email, if you had a question for which you didn’t need the answer right away, but just within a couple of hours.
    [Father #3]

    Timely email communication with the neonatal unit gives parents the opportunity to communicate when needed. This, combined with an online knowledge base regarding preterm infant care, especially breastfeeding and nutrition, would provide security and self-efficacy.


    Discussion

    Principal Findings

    This study supports the use of NH because it gives parents the feeling of being a family and promotes their self-efficacy. NH provides parents with the guidance they need from the nurses when they do not require hands-on support.

    Studies have demonstrated the importance of FCC when preterm infants are admitted to the NICU, showing positive effects on parent-infant relationships and parents' experience of being involved in infant care [1,25]. Despite the NICU at HCA performing FCC, parents experienced a lack of involvement and questioned their own decision-making regarding infant care; the hospital environment and presence of health care professionals affected parents’ thinking and actions. It has been shown that the NICU milieu can be a barrier for parent-infant bonding [26], contrary to NH [9-11]. Statements from parents with an infant receiving NH support the findings from Turner et al [26]: they experienced growing independence, increased decision-making, and a feeling of the infants as their children. When parents are successful in decision-making, it increases their self-efficacy [27] and they experience increased empowerment. The noisy, busy environment of the NICU is a barrier for establishment of breastfeeding [26] and is stressful for parents. Studies suggest that establishment of breastfeeding might benefit from NH [8-10], and parental responsibility for infant feeding and general care reduces parental stress [28].

    Our findings revealed that nurse guidance of infant care, rather than hands-on support, provided a feeling of security. This supports telemedicine as an alternative to hospital admission. Gund found that video-conferencing could reduce the need for home visits and was less stressful than home visits [6]. However, Lindberg found that video-conferencing could not replace ordinary care [29]. This inconsistency may be explained by the 4-year time difference between these two studies, during which our adaption to technology has increased rapidly. The methods used in these prior studies are not in accordance with recommendations for implementing telemedicine in clinical practice today [30-31], since the users’ needs were not identified before using telemedicine. Identifying needs of users before developing a telemedicine device can reduce the risk of implementation failure in clinical practice [31]. However, the findings in this study were in accordance with recommendations, and the development of a telemedicine device covering all parental needs is feasible.

    Study Limitations

    This study had a small sample size. Infant gestational age and birth weight varied, and the parents represented a heterogeneous group varying in age, education, and primiparous versus multiparous status. Individual interviews and focus group interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached [22] and took place during NH and infant admission to the NICU, preventing recall bias.

    Conclusions

    These data highlight the importance of NH for preterm infants. NH provides parents with a feeling of being a family and supports their self-efficacy. Parents do not request hands-on support for infant care but feel safe with nurse-provided security. Parents also outlined the need for a technological “bell cord” if NH is to be supported by telemedicine, which would consist of the following: possibility for video-conferencing, timely written email communication, and a knowledge base of information regarding infant nutrition and breastfeeding.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors would like to thank all of the parents who participated in the study and were willing to share their experiences so openly. The authors would also like to thank health coordinator Mette Petersen and neonatal home care nurse Renate Zimmermann from the neonatal unit at Hvidovre Hospital for helping to recruit parents for the study.

    This study was funded by Hans Christian Andersen Children’s Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Region of Southern Denmark, the Danish Health Organization, the Danielsen Foundation, and Free Research Fund at Odense University Hospital.

    Authors' Contributions

    KG obtained the required approvals for the study, recruited participants at HCA, conducted individual interviews and focus group interviews, and performed data analysis. JC participated in an observational study in the NICU and in the focus group interviews. AB participated in the first step of the analysis and, together with GZ, supervised KG throughout the study and agreed on the analysis and framework.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    References

    1. Flacking R, Lehtonen L, Thomson G, Axelin A, Ahlqvist S, Moran VH, Separation and Closeness Experiences in the Neonatal Environment (SCENE) group. Closeness and separation in neonatal intensive care. Acta Paediatr 2012 Oct;101(10):1032-1037 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Aagaard H, Hall EO. Mothers' experiences of having a preterm infant in the neonatal care unit: A meta-synthesis. J Pediatr Nurs 2008 Jun;23(3):e26-e36. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Sáenz P, Cerdá M, Díaz JL, Yi P, Gorba M, Boronat N, et al. Psychological stress of parents of preterm infants enrolled in an early discharge programme from the neonatal intensive care unit: A prospective randomised trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009 Mar;94(2):F98-F104. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Ortenstrand A, Waldenström U, Winbladh B. Early discharge of preterm infants needing limited special care, followed by domiciliary nursing care. Acta Paediatr 1999 Sep;88(9):1024-1030. [Medline]
    5. Cescutti-Butler L. Eliciting parental views regarding early discharge to home care for premature infants. Infant 2009;5(1):23-27.
    6. Gund A, Sjöqvist BA, Wigert H, Hentz E, Lindecrantz K, Bry K. A randomized controlled study about the use of eHealth in the home health care of premature infants. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13:22 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Gunn TR, Thompson JM, Jackson H, McKnight S, Buckthought G, Gunn AJ. Does early hospital discharge with home support of families with preterm infants affect breastfeeding success? A randomized trial. Acta Paediatr 2000 Nov;89(11):1358-1363. [Medline]
    8. Ahnfeldt AM, Stanchev H, Jørgensen HL, Greisen G. Age and weight at final discharge from an early discharge programme for stable but tube-fed preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2015 Apr;104(4):377-383. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Brødsgaard A, Zimmermann R, Petersen M. A preterm lifeline: Early discharge programme based on family-centred care. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2015 Oct;20(4):232-243. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Meerlo-Habing ZE, Kosters-Boes EA, Klip H, Brand PL. Early discharge with tube feeding at home for preterm infants is associated with longer duration of breast feeding. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009 Jul;94(4):F294-F297. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Dellenmark-Blom M, Wigert H. Parents' experiences with neonatal home care following initial care in the neonatal intensive care unit: A phenomenological hermeneutical interview study. J Adv Nurs 2014 Mar;70(3):575-586. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Pedersen KM. Demografien, den økonomiske krise og sundhedsvæsenet. Polit 2012 Dec;15(4):20-33.
    13. Sturm LD. Implementation and evaluation of a home gavage program for preterm infants. Neonatal Netw 2005;24(4):21-25. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Merritt TA, Pillers D, Prows SL. Early NICU discharge of very low birth weight infants: A critical review and analysis. Semin Neonatol 2003 Apr;8(2):95-115. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Tan K, Lai NM. Telemedicine for the support of parents of high-risk newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD006818. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156-165. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Clemensen J, Larsen SB, Kyng M, Kirkevold M. Participatory design in health sciences: Using cooperative experimental methods in developing health services and computer technology. Qual Health Res 2007 Jan;17(1):122-130. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Danbjørg DB, Wagner L, Clemensen J. Do families after early postnatal discharge need new ways to communicate with the hospital? A feasibilility study. Midwifery 2014 Jun;30(6):725-732. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Simonsen J, Robertson T, editors. Routledge Internatinal Handbook of Participatory Design. New York, NY: Routledge; 2013.
    20. Kyng M. Users and computers: A contextual approach to design computer artefacts. Scand J Inf Syst 1998;10:7-44.
    21. Spradley JP. Participant Observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1980.
    22. Malterud K. Fokusgrupper som Forksningsmetode for Medisin og Helsefag. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget; 2012.
    23. Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interview: Introduktion til et Håndværk. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag; 2009.
    24. Malterud K. Kvalitative Metoder i Medicinsk Forskning. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget; 2011.
    25. Gooding JS, Cooper LG, Blaine AI, Franck LS, Howse JL, Berns SD. Family support and family-centered care in the neonatal intensive care unit: Origins, advances, impact. Semin Perinatol 2011 Feb;35(1):20-28. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Alves E, Rodrigues C, Fraga S, Barros H, Silva S. Parent's views on factors that help or hinder breast milk supply in neonatal care units: Systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013;98(6):511-517. [Medline]
    27. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: Ramachaudran VS, editor. Encyclopaedia of Human Behaviour. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1994:4-81.
    28. Turner M, Chur-Hansen A, Winefield H, Stanners M. The assessment of parental stress and support in the neonatal intensive care unit using the Parent Stress Scale - Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Women Birth 2015 Sep;28(3):252-258. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Lindberg B, Axelsson K, Öhrling K. Taking care of their baby at home but with nursing staff as support: The use of videoconferencing in providing neonatal support to parents of preterm infants. J Neonatal Nurs 2009;15(2):47-55.
    30. Kahn JM. Virtual visits--Confronting the challenges of telemedicine. N Engl J Med 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1684-1685. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Zanaboni P, Wootton R. Adoption of telemedicine: From pilot stage to routine delivery. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012;12:1 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]


    Abbreviations

    FCC: family-centered care
    HCA: Hans Christian Andersen Children’s Hospital
    HH: Hvidovre Hospital
    NH: neonatal home care
    NICU: neonatal intensive care unit
    PD: participatory design


    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 21.12.15; peer-reviewed by B Dinesen, P Schulz, E Afari-kumah; comments to author 30.03.16; revised version received 01.04.16; accepted 03.04.16; published 08.07.16

    ©Kristina Garne, Anne Brødsgaard, Gitte Zachariassen, Jane Clemensen. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 08.07.2016.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.