Published on in Vol 3, No 4 (2014): Oct-Dec

“Real-World” Practical Evaluation Strategies: A Review of Telehealth Evaluation

“Real-World” Practical Evaluation Strategies: A Review of Telehealth Evaluation

“Real-World” Practical Evaluation Strategies: A Review of Telehealth Evaluation

Journals

  1. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A'Court C, Hinder S, Fahy N, Procter R, Shaw S. Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(11):e367 View
  2. Jackson B, Gray K, Knowles S, De Cruz P. EHealth Technologies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis 2016;10(9):1103 View
  3. Triantafyllidis A, Tsanas A. Applications of Machine Learning in Real-Life Digital Health Interventions: Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(4):e12286 View
  4. AlDossary S, Martin-Khan M, Bradford N, Smith A. A systematic review of the methodologies used to evaluate telemedicine service initiatives in hospital facilities. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017;97:171 View
  5. Banbury A, Nancarrow S, Dart J, Gray L, Parkinson L. Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(2):e25 View
  6. Alami H, Gagnon M, Fortin J. Some Multidimensional Unintended Consequences of Telehealth Utilization: A Multi-Project Evaluation Synthesis. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2019;8(6):337 View
  7. Wade V, Gray L, Carati C. Theoretical frameworks in telemedicine research. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2017;23(1):181 View
  8. Cottrell M, Russell T. Telehealth for musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 2020;48:102193 View
  9. Alami H, Gagnon M, Fortin J. Involving Citizen-Patients in the Development of Telehealth Services: Qualitative Study of Experts’ and Citizen-Patients’ Perspectives. Journal of Participatory Medicine 2018;10(4):e10665 View
  10. Steele Gray C, Wodchis W, Upshur R, Cott C, McKinstry B, Mercer S, Palen T, Ramsay T, Thavorn K. Supporting Goal-Oriented Primary Health Care for Seniors with Complex Care Needs Using Mobile Technology: Evaluation and Implementation of the Health System Performance Research Network, Bridgepoint Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Tool. JMIR Research Protocols 2016;5(2):e126 View
  11. Paiva J, Carvalho T, Vilela A, Nóbrega G, Souza B, Valentim R. SMART: a service-oriented architecture for monitoring and assessing Brazil’s Telehealth outcomes. Research on Biomedical Engineering 2018;34(4):317 View
  12. Grady M, Cameron H, Levy B, Katz L. Remote Health Consultations Supported by a Diabetes Management Web Application With a New Glucose Meter Demonstrates Improved Glycemic Control. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 2016;10(3):737 View
  13. Steele Gray C, Gravesande J, Hans P, Nie J, Sharpe S, Loganathan M, Lyons R, Cott C. Using Exploratory Trials to Identify Relevant Contexts and Mechanisms in Complex Electronic Health Interventions: Evaluating the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool. JMIR Formative Research 2019;3(1):e11950 View
  14. Kidholm K, Jensen L, Kjølhede T, Nielsen E, Horup M. Validity of the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine: A Delphi study. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2018;24(2):118 View
  15. Standing C, Standing S, McDermott M, Gururajan R, Kiani Mavi R. The Paradoxes of Telehealth: a Review of the Literature 2000-2015. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2018;35(1):90 View
  16. Jackson B, Con D, De Cruz P. Design considerations for an eHealth decision support tool in inflammatory bowel disease self-management. Internal Medicine Journal 2018;48(6):674 View
  17. Jurkeviciute M, Enam A, Torres-Bonilla J, Eriksson H. Planning a holistic summative eHealth evaluation in an interdisciplinary and multi-national setting: a case study and propositions for guideline development. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2021;21(1) View
  18. Banbury A, Smith A, Mehrotra A, Page M, Caffery L. A comparison study between metropolitan and rural hospital-based telehealth activity to inform adoption and expansion. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2021:1357633X2199820 View
  19. Rauwerdink A, Kasteleyn M, Chavannes N, Schijven M. The successes and lessons of a Dutch University Hospitals’ eHealth program: An evaluation study protocol. Clinical eHealth 2021;4:30 View
  20. Brehon K, Carriere J, Churchill K, Loyola-Sanchez A, O'Connell P, Papathanassoglou E, MacIsaac R, Tavakoli M, Ho C, Pohar Manhas K. Evaluating Community-Facing Virtual Modalities to Support Complex Neurological Populations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2021;10(7):e28267 View
  21. Aminoff H, Meijer S. Context and complexity in telemedicine evaluation: Work Domain Analysis in a surgical setting (Preprint). JMIR Perioperative Medicine 2020 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Solomon D, Soares N. Interprofessional Care Coordination for Pediatric Autism Spectrum Disorder. View
  2. Gensorowsky D, Dörries M, Greiner W. Telemedizin. View