Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Scoping Review Protocols (580) Clinical Informatics (2383) Digital Health Reporting Standards, Quality and Transparency in e-Research (246) Artificial Intelligence (4994) Computerized History Taking (24) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (1626) Applications of AI (1084) Ambient AI Scribes and AI-Driven Documentation Technologies (114)

Published on in Vol 14 (2025)

This is a member publication of Bibsam Consortium

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/73602, first published .
Doctor in white coat using tablet, stethoscope around neck

Health Care Professionals’ Experiences and Opinions About Generative AI and Ambient Scribes in Clinical Documentation: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Health Care Professionals’ Experiences and Opinions About Generative AI and Ambient Scribes in Clinical Documentation: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Authors of this article:

Carolina Garcia Sanchez1 Author Orcid Image ;   Anna Kharko1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Maria Hägglund1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Sara Riggare1 Author Orcid Image ;   Charlotte Blease1, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Atiku S, Olakotan O, Owolanke K. Usability‐Related Barriers and Facilitators Influencing the Adoption and Use of AI Scribes in Healthcare: A Scoping Review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2026;32(1) View
  2. Bandalagi S, Bamon R. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Applied Science and Biotechnology Journal for Advanced Research 2026;5(3):37 View
  3. Miao J, Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology Education. Advances in Kidney Disease and Health 2026 View
  4. Walker K. Asymmetrical consent in ambient clinical AI: rethinking patient recording rights and epistemic authority in U.S. health care. AI and Ethics 2026;6(5) View