Published on in Vol 9, No 11 (2020): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/19112, first published .
Family Members’ Perspectives on Family and Social Support Available to Suicidal Patients, and Health Systems’ Interactions and Responses to Suicide Cases in Alberta: Protocol for a Quantitative Research Study

Family Members’ Perspectives on Family and Social Support Available to Suicidal Patients, and Health Systems’ Interactions and Responses to Suicide Cases in Alberta: Protocol for a Quantitative Research Study

Family Members’ Perspectives on Family and Social Support Available to Suicidal Patients, and Health Systems’ Interactions and Responses to Suicide Cases in Alberta: Protocol for a Quantitative Research Study

Protocol

1Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

2Addiction & Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada

3Centre for Suicide Prevention, Calgary, AB, Canada

4Canadian Mental Health Association, Calgary, AB, Canada

5Canadian Mental Health Association, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Corresponding Author:

Vincent Israel Opoku Agyapong, MD, PhD, FRCPC, FRCPsych

Department of Psychiatry

Faculty of Medicine

University of Alberta

8440 112 St NW

Edmonton, AB, T6R 3P5

Canada

Phone: 1 780 714 4315

Email: agyapong@ualberta.ca


Background: Suicide is a major cause of preventable death globally and a leading cause of death by injury in Canada. To support people who experience suicidal thoughts and behaviors and to ultimately prevent people from dying by suicide, it is important to understand individual and familial experiences with the health care system.

Objective: We present the protocol for a study, the objective of which is to explore how people who died by suicide, and their family members, interacted with the health care system.

Methods: This is a quantitative research study. Data will be collected through a self-administered paper-based or online survey of the family member of patients who died by suicide. The sample size was calculated to be 385 (margin of error ±3%).

Results: Data collection will start in October 2020 and results will be available by March 2021. We expect the results to shed light on the experiences of individuals who died by suicide and their family members with the health care system. The study has received ethical clearance from the Health Ethics Research Board of the University of Alberta (Pro00096342).

Conclusions: Our study may inform practice, policy, and future research. The findings may shape how members of the health care system respond to people who are at risk of suicide and their families.

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/19112

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(11):e19112

doi:10.2196/19112

Keywords

Crowdfunding campaign to support this specific research

keyboard with crowdfunding key instead of enter key

We help JMIR researchers to raise funds to pursue their research and development aimed at tackling important health and technology challenges. If you would like to show your support for this author, please donate using the button below. The funds raised will directly benefit the corresponding author of this article (minus 8% admin fees). Your donations will help this author to continue publishing open access papers in JMIR journals. Donations of over $100 may also be acknowledged in future publications.

Suggested contribution levels: $20/$50/$100



Background

Suicide is a serious global public health problem, with an estimated 800,000 people reported to die by suicide every year [1]. In Canada, suicide remains the 9th leading cause of death and the second leading cause of death among children, youth, and young adults [2]. Suicide impacts people of all ages and backgrounds in Canada. Every day, an average of more than 10 Canadians die by suicide. There are close to 6000 emergency department visits and 2000 hospitalizations every year for self-inflicted injuries [3]. For every person lost to suicide, many more experience thoughts of suicide or suicide attempts. For every death by suicide, a large circle of survivors are significantly affected by the loss. Each suicide results in 135 people exposed (ie, who knew the person), who may need clinician services or support following exposure [4].

There were 4000 suicides in Canada in 2018 [5], with more than 500 of these deaths occurring in Alberta. Suicide is consistently a leading cause of death among Albertans. Suicide claims more lives annually than other causes such as motor vehicle collisions and homicides. Over 75% of those deaths occur among men, most between the ages of 30-69 years [6]. Health care systems play a vital role in suicide prevention. One study in Alberta, for instance, found that the majority of people who died by suicide used a health service in the year prior to their death. They were also more likely to use the emergency department, in-patient services, or community mental health services than those who died from other causes; they typically used health services for mental disorders as well [7].

In Alberta, which is the site of this study, suicide prevention initiatives, including Living Hope, are underway to enhance aspects of the health care system, as evidenced by the Implementation Plan for the Edmonton Suicide Prevention Strategy [8]. Living Hope promotes a comprehensive preventative approach that seeks to enhance access to the protective factors that decrease the risk of suicide. The implementation plan upholds the inherent value of every person and recognizes that residents of Alberta, both as service providers and as community members, can offer the compassion, respect, and hope needed to increase resilience and nurture hope for those contemplating suicide [8].

The Mental Health Commission of Canada, in collaboration with the Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention, the Centre for Suicide Prevention, the Public Health Agency of Canada, alongside an Advisory Committee comprising people with lived experience related to suicide, have developed toolkits to support individuals who have been impacted by suicide. One toolkit is tailored for people who have attempted suicide, and the other is focused on resources for people who have lost someone to suicide [9].

Beyond stakeholder engagement [10] and an understanding of the dimensions of service quality [11], little is known locally about the personal, family, and social circumstances of people who died by suicide in Alberta. Similarly, little is known about how individuals who died by suicide and those close to them experienced the health care system. The current mechanism by which Alberta Health Services (AHS) investigates suicide is through the Quality Assurance Review (QAR). A QAR of an adverse event utilizes the Systems Analysis Methodology, which aims to determine what happened, how it happened, and what can be done to improve care for future patients. This type of review generally involves engaging a multidisciplinary team to examine all of the health care system components (eg, environment, task, policy, etc) as they relate to an event (or group of similar events). This process often results in recommendations aimed at improving the quality and safety of health care delivery. The focus is on improving structures, processes, and/or practices within AHS [12]. QARs are done following a suicide on a case-by-case basis, and the results are not shared beyond those directly involved. The privacy of the QAR limits case comparison and knowledge translation. Additionally, an understanding of the context of death by suicide is needed, as it is thought to differ from the context of a suicide attempt. QARs usually focus on the health systems’ contributions to the suicide and do not place much emphasis on examining the personal, familial, and societal factors that also contribute to deaths by suicide. One study found that while individuals who attempt suicide generally exhibited similar levels of depression, those who died by suicide were significantly more likely to have experienced significant job stress and financial problems, left a suicide note, and used alcohol and drugs prior to the act [13]. AHS is committed to patient- and family-centered care [14], which highlights the importance of talking to families about both their own and their relatives’ experiences with the health care system. Ultimately, insight into the experiences of people who died by suicide, and their family members, has the potential to inform policy and practice, and shape how members of the health care system, and AHS specifically, respond to individuals who are at risk of suicide.

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to understand better the family and social circumstances of individuals who died by suicide, and how those who died by suicide and their family members interacted with the health care system. This study extends the knowledge to be gained from a recently completed qualitative study that examined family members’ perspectives on health system interactions with those who died by suicide [15].

Our specific quantitative research questions are:

  1. What factors related to family, society, and health systems contribute to death by suicide in Alberta?
  2. How do individuals impacted by the suicide of a family member perceive their own interactions with the health care system?

To the best of our knowledge, no previous province-wide study has examined the personal, familial, societal, and health systems factors that contribute to suicide deaths in Canada. One study was conducted by Schaffer et al [16] to investigate the population-based analysis of health care contacts among suicide decedents prior to death by suicide. It was a systematic extraction of data from records at the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario of each person who died by suicide in the city of Toronto from 1998 to 2011 [16]. Consequently, this work, the first of its kind in Alberta and in Canada, could help identify important factors that are associated with deaths by suicide in the province of Alberta.


Study Design

This study utilizes a quantitative research design. Data will be collected through a self-administered paper-based or online survey of the family members of patients who died by suicide (Multimedia Appendix 1). A sample size of 385 was predetermined on the assumption that with an annual average of 500 people dying by suicide in Alberta, a 95% CI, and one family member per suicide decedent completing the survey, the sample size needed to estimate family members’ perspectives on health system interactions, as well as family and social support for suicidal patients, with the margin of error ±3%, is 385. Data will be collected via both paper format and online. Prospective participants will be provided with paper-based or online information leaflets.

Participants

Participants will be adults; they should also have a close family member who has died by suicide in the previous 12 months and had regular contact with this family member prior to their suicide, such that they are reasonably aware of their personal, family, and social situation prior to their suicide as well as their interaction with the health care system. Participants do not have to identify themselves and their submission of the survey implies their consent.

Data Collection

We initially designed a survey form that reflected risk factors for dying by suicide identified in the published literature as well as additional factors to help answer our research questions. The draft survey questions were reviewed by the Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA), Alberta Division, and the Centre for Suicide Prevention, and changes were made based on the feedback received. The survey was then pretested on two volunteer family members of patients who had died by suicide before being further revised and finalized for use in the study. The survey questions take 10-55 minutes to complete, and no incentives will be offered to participants who complete the survey. Paper-based recruitment will be done in collaboration with the CMHA regional offices in Alberta. The association runs focus groups for family members of people who died by suicide, with hundreds of people attending annually. Information leaflets and posters advertising the study will be distributed among prospective participants attending these focus groups. Those interested in participating in the study will be provided with guidance on how to access the survey questions.

In addition, online versions of the survey will be promoted through the websites and social media feeds of AHS, the CMHA, the Centre for Suicide Prevention, the Edmonton Mental Health Foundation, and the University of Alberta’s Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry. The online survey is designed in accordance with the CHERRIES (Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys) checklist [17]. Prospective participants will be invited to review the online version of the information leaflet and proceed to complete the survey. Information identifying participants will not be collected for the online survey, and completion and submission of the survey denotes consent. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (Hong Kong Amendment) and Good Clinical Practice (international guidelines). Informed consent will be obtained from each participant. The study has received ethical clearance from Health Ethics Research Board of the University of Alberta (Pro00096342).

Data Analysis

Quantitative data will be analyzed using SPSS, version 26 (IBM Corp), using descriptive statistics and correlational analyses [18]. A chi-square test will be used to explore differences in responses between demographic variables of the suicide decedent and the respondent.


Data collection is expected to commence in October 2020. Results will be available by March 2021. Findings from the study will help illuminate factors related to family, society, and health systems, and the role they play in death by suicide in Alberta.

The study results will be disseminated at several levels, including to participants, practitioners, academics/researchers, and health care organizations.

Our team will plan an organizational engagement strategy to advance discussions about feasibility and effectiveness prior to the conclusion of the trial. This will help ensure the findings are a relevant part of decision-making processes. In addition, this may facilitate the planning of a larger study that is endorsed at both leadership and operational levels so that the potential benefits of the study results can reach participants in a timelier fashion.


The main objective of this study is to investigate the familial, societal and health systems–based support available to individuals who die by suicide in Alberta. It also aims to examine the support offered by the health care system in Alberta to family members of patients who die by suicide.

Studies in other jurisdictions suggests that personal, familial, and social factors such as stigma [1], public education [19,20], psychiatric illness [21,22], age [23,24], gender [1,23], marital status [25], positive support [26,27], familial history of suicide [28-31], and alcohol consumption [32,33] are associated with death by suicide. Similarly, health system factors such as staff attitude toward suicidal persons [19], recency of hospitalization for suicide attempt and recent health care contact [19,21,34-37], underdiagnoses of mental disorders and major depressions [38], brevity of interactions with medical staff [39], ignoring suicide-related warning signs by health care providers [40], lack of trust in health care services [41], and relatives’ feelings of exclusion from information on treatment [42] have all been positively associated with deaths by suicide in studies conducted in other jurisdictions. The results of our study will provide us with information on familial, societal, and health systems–related influences in Alberta as well as aspects of care in need of further improvement and refinement. The recommendations arising from this study have the potential to lead to significant system enhancements and reductions in suicide rates in Alberta and beyond.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by Alberta Health Services, the Centre for Suicide Prevention, and the Canadian Mental Health Association.

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this paper.

Authors' Contributions

RMAE-M, contributed to the study design and drafted the initial and final versions of manuscript. LU, SS, DL, AG, MG, LM, IC, DG, and RO contributed to the study design and reviewed the initial and final drafts of the manuscript. VA conceived and designed the study and contributed to drafting the initial and final versions of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

Quantitative research study survey.

DOCX File , 36 KB

References

  1. Preventing Suicide: Key Facts. World Health Organization. 2018.   URL: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide [accessed 2019-02-10]
  2. Suicide in Canada. Government of Canada. 2019.   URL: https:/​/www.​canada.ca/​en/​public-health/​services/​publications/​healthy-living/​suicide-canada-infographic.​html [accessed 2019-02-18]
  3. Alberta Health Services. 2019.   URL: https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/injprev/Page4875.aspx [accessed 2019-12-16]
  4. Cerel J, Brown MM, Maple M, Singleton M, van de Venne J, Moore M, et al. How Many People Are Exposed to Suicide? Not Six. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2019 Apr;49(2):529-534. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Table 13-10-0392-01: Deaths and age-specific mortality rates, by selected grouped causes. Statistics Canada. 2019.   URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310039201 [accessed 2019-02-10]
  6. Alberta Mental Health for All, Suicide in Alberta. Canadian Mental Health Association.   URL: https://www.mymentalhealth.ca/get-help/topics/suicide-in-alberta/ [accessed 2019-02-10]
  7. Morrison KB, Laing L. Adults' use of health services in the year before death by suicide in Alberta. Health Rep 2011 Sep;22(3):15-22 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  8. Living Hope A Community Plan to Prevent Suicide in Edmonton 2018-2021. Implementation Planning Committee.   URL: https://www.edmonton.ca/programs_services/documents/PDF/living-hope-suicide-prevention-plan.pdf
  9. Toolkit for people who have been impacted by a suicide loss. Mental Health Commission of Canada. 2017.   URL: https://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca/sites/default/files/2019-03/suicide_loss_toolkit_eng.pdf) [accessed 2019-12-16]
  10. Edmonton Suicide Prevention Strategy 2016-2021. Edmonton Suicide Prevention Advisory Committee. 2016.   URL: http://sirepub.edmonton.ca/sirepub/cache/2/hmwnussp0svz2urje0pqq04p/57277502182019050344912.PDF [accessed 2019-12-12]
  11. Liu P, Currie S, Adamyk-Simpson J. What are the most important dimensions of quality for addiction and mental health services from the perspective of its users? Patient Experience Journal 2018 Apr 25;5(1):106-114 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
  12. Alberta Health Services. Overview: Learning from Adverse Events in Alberta Health Services. 2015.   URL: https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/hp/ps/if-hp-ps-learning-from-adverse-event.pdf [accessed 2019-02-18]
  13. DeJong TM, Overholser JC, Stockmeier CA. Apples to oranges?: a direct comparison between suicide attempters and suicide completers. J Affect Disord 2010 Jul;124(1-2):90-97 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Alberta Health Services.   URL: https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/ [accessed 2019-12-11]
  15. Bryksa E, Shalaby R, Friesen L, Klingle K, Gaine G, Urichuk L, et al. Family Members' Perspectives of Health Care System Interactions With Suicidal Patients and Responses to Suicides: Protocol for a Qualitative Research Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2019 Aug 09;8(8):e13797 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Schaffer A, Sinyor M, Kurdyak P, Vigod S, Sareen J, Reis C, et al. Population-based analysis of health care contacts among suicide decedents: identifying opportunities for more targeted suicide prevention strategies. World Psychiatry 2016 Jun;15(2):135-145 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2019.
  19. Akotia CS, Knizek BL, Hjelmeland H, Kinyanda E, Osafo J. Reasons for attempting suicide: An exploratory study in Ghana. Transcult Psychiatry 2019 Feb 09;56(1):233-249. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Phillips JA, Hempstead K. Differences in U.S. Suicide Rates by Educational Attainment, 2000-2014. Am J Prev Med 2017 Oct;53(4):e123-e130. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Haukka J, Suominen K, Partonen T, Lönnqvist J. Determinants and outcomes of serious attempted suicide: a nationwide study in Finland, 1996-2003. Am J Epidemiol 2008 May 15;167(10):1155-1163. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  22. Tidemalm D, Långström N, Lichtenstein P, Runeson B. Risk of suicide after suicide attempt according to coexisting psychiatric disorder: Swedish cohort study with long term follow-up. BMJ 2008 Nov 18;337:a2205 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). NCHS Vital Statistics System for numbers of deaths. Bureau of Census for population estimates. Fatal Injury Data. Visualization tool. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services   URL: https://wisqars-viz.cdc.gov:8006/ [accessed 2019-12-11]
  24. Stone DM, Simon TR, Fowler KA, Kegler SR, Yuan K, Holland KM, et al. Vital Signs: Trends in State Suicide Rates - United States, 1999-2016 and Circumstances Contributing to Suicide - 27 States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018 Jun 08;67(22):617-624 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Kyung-Sook W, SangSoo S, Sangjin S, Young-Jeon S. Marital status integration and suicide: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. Soc Sci Med 2018 Jan;197:116-126. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Kleiman EM, Riskind JH, Schaefer KE. Social support and positive events as suicide resiliency factors: examination of synergistic buffering effects. Arch Suicide Res 2014;18(2):144-155. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  27. Laglaoui Bakhiyi C, Jaussent I, Beziat S, Cohen R, Genty C, Kahn J, et al. Positive and negative life events and reasons for living modulate suicidal ideation in a sample of patients with history of suicide attempts. J Psychiatr Res 2017 May;88:64-71. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Melhem NM, Brent DA, Ziegler M, Iyengar S, Kolko D, Oquendo M, et al. Familial pathways to early-onset suicidal behavior: familial and individual antecedents of suicidal behavior. Am J Psychiatry 2007 Sep;164(9):1364-1370 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  29. Ribeiro JD, Huang X, Fox KR, Franklin JC. Depression and hopelessness as risk factors for suicide ideation, attempts and death: meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Br J Psychiatry 2018 May;212(5):279-286. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Donath C, Bergmann MC, Kliem S, Hillemacher T, Baier D. Epidemiology of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and direct self-injurious behavior in adolescents with a migration background: a representative study. BMC Pediatr 2019 Feb 01;19(1):45 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  31. Runeson B, Asberg M. Family history of suicide among suicide victims. Am J Psychiatry 2003 Aug;160(8):1525-1526. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  32. Sher L. Alcohol consumption and suicide. QJM 2006 Jan;99(1):57-61. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  33. Pompili M, Serafini G, Innamorati M, Dominici G, Ferracuti S, Kotzalidis GD, et al. Suicidal behavior and alcohol abuse. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010 Apr;7(4):1392-1431 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. Keller MB, Hanks DL. Anxiety symptom relief in depression treatment outcomes. J Clin Psychiatry 1995;56 Suppl 6:22-29. [Medline]
  35. Pirkis J, Burgess P. Suicide and recency of health care contacts. A systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 1998 Dec;173:462-474. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  36. Ivey-Stephenson AZ, Crosby AE, Jack SPD, Haileyesus T, Kresnow-Sedacca M. Suicide Trends Among and Within Urbanization Levels by Sex, Race/Ethnicity, Age Group, and Mechanism of Death - United States, 2001-2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017 Oct 06;66(18):1-16 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Britton PC, Ilgen MA, Rudd MD, Conner KR. Warning signs for suicide within a week of healthcare contact in Veteran decedents. Psychiatry Res 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):395-399 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  38. Chang C, Liao S, Chiang H, Chen Y, Tseng K, Chau Y, et al. Gender differences in healthcare service utilisation 1 year before suicide: national record linkage study. Br J Psychiatry 2009 Nov;195(5):459-460. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  39. Leavey G, Mallon S, Rondon-Sulbaran J, Galway K, Rosato M, Hughes L. The failure of suicide prevention in primary care: family and GP perspectives - a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry 2017 Nov 21;17(1):369 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  40. Peters K, Murphy G, Jackson D. Events prior to completed suicide: perspectives of family survivors. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2013 May;34(5):309-316. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  41. Kjølseth I, Ekeberg O, Steihaug S. Elderly people who committed suicide--their contact with the health service. What did they expect, and what did they get? Aging Ment Health 2010 Nov;14(8):938-946. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  42. Owens C, Owen G, Belam J, Lloyd K, Rapport F, Donovan J, et al. Recognising and responding to suicidal crisis within family and social networks: qualitative study. BMJ 2011 Oct 18;343:d5801 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]


AHS: Alberta Health Services
CHERRIES: Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys
CMHA: Canadian Mental Health Association
QAR: Quality Assurance Review


Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 04.04.20; peer-reviewed by E Kleiman, K Fox; comments to author 12.06.20; revised version received 02.08.20; accepted 18.08.20; published 24.11.20

Copyright

©Rabab M Abou El-Magd, Liana Urichuk, Shireen Surood, Daniel Li, Andrew Greenshaw, Mara Grunau, Laureen MacNeil, Ione Challborn, David Grauwiler, Robert Olson, Vincent Israel Opoku Agyapong. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 24.11.2020.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.