This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Non-Randomized Study Protocols and Methods (Non-eHealth) (555) Depression and Mood Disorders; Suicide Prevention (1320)

Published on in Vol 7, No 6 (2018): June

Prospective Epidemiological Research on Functioning Outcomes Related to Major Depressive Disorder in Japan (PERFORM-J): Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study

Prospective Epidemiological Research on Functioning Outcomes Related to Major Depressive Disorder in Japan (PERFORM-J): Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study

Prospective Epidemiological Research on Functioning Outcomes Related to Major Depressive Disorder in Japan (PERFORM-J): Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study

Authors of this article:

Tomiki Sumiyoshi1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Koichiro Watanabe3 Author Orcid Image ;   Shinichi Noto4 Author Orcid Image ;   Shigeru Sakamoto5 Author Orcid Image ;   Yoshiya Moriguchi6 Author Orcid Image ;   Shuichi Okamoto5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (3) Metrics

    Protocol

    1Department of Preventive Intervention for Psychiatric Disorders, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan

    2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Translational Medical Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan

    3Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

    4Department of Health Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan

    5Japan Medical Affairs, Japan Pharma Business Unit, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan

    6Medical Affairs, Lundbeck Japan KK, Tokyo, Japan

    Corresponding Author:

    Tomiki Sumiyoshi, MD, PhD

    Department of Preventive Intervention for Psychiatric Disorders

    National Institute of Mental Health

    National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry

    4-1-1 Ogawahigashi, Kodaira

    Tokyo, 187-8551

    Japan

    Phone: 81 42 341 2711

    Fax:81 42 346 3569

    Email: sumiyot@ncnp.go.jp


    Background: Patients with major depressive disorder may exhibit cognitive dysfunction that can affect functional outcomes. However, the prevalence and burden of cognitive dysfunction in Japanese patients with MDD have not been thoroughly examined.

    Objective: To investigate the time course (over 6 months) of several functional outcomes during treatment with antidepressants in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder. The primary objective is to assess longitudinal changes in cognitive function and depressive symptoms, using both clinician-rated and patient-rated scales. The study incorporates assessments of cognitive function and other functional outcomes (functional capacity, disability, work productivity and impairments of activity, and quality of life), as well as depressive symptoms.

    Methods: PERFORM-J (Prospective Epidemiological Research on Functioning Outcomes Related to Major Depressive Disorder in Japan) is a 6-month, prospective, multi-center, epidemiological cohort study. Participants are Japanese outpatients aged 18-65 years with a recurrent or new diagnosis of a major depressive episode (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision [DSM-IV-TR]), who are initiating a new antidepressant as monotherapy (either as first-line therapy or after switching from a previous antidepressant). Eligible patients are evaluated objectively during four visits (at baseline and at Months 1, 2, and 6) using physician-rated assessments of severity of depressive symptoms, cognitive function, and functional capacity. Subjective, patient-reported, outcomes are also assessed as indicators of depressive symptoms, disability, work productivity or impairments of activity, and perceived cognitive dysfunction.

    Results: The study began in September 2016. Patient enrollment was completed on June 30, 2017, with 523 patients having been enrolled from 48 study sites. As of October, 2017, 279 patients had completed the study.

    Conclusions: PERFORM-J is expected to provide valuable information on the longitudinal relationship between cognitive dysfunction, depressive symptoms, and other functional outcomes in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder who initiate monotherapy with antidepressants.

    Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000024320; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi? recptno=R000028011 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70K7W9PgC).

    Registered Report Identifier: RR1-10.2196/9682

    JMIR Res Protoc 2018;7(6):e161

    doi:10.2196/resprot.9682

    Keywords

    antidepressants; depression; major depressive disorder; cognitive dysfunction; observational study 


    Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric condition, with an estimated 12-month prevalence of 2.2% in Japan [1,2]. Although mood disturbances are characteristic of patients with MDD, there is accumulating evidence for the presence of cognitive dysfunction, linked with poor functional outcomes [3-5]. For example, in a recent large-scale, cross-sectional study conducted in six Asian countries and territories, 67% of currently depressed, nonmedicated outpatients reported subjective memory deficits and 73% experienced concentration deficits [6]. In addition, Japanese treatment guidelines for depression recommend that cognitive function should be carefully monitored, even after remission of depressive (affective) symptoms has been achieved [7]. This is partly due to a possibility of relapse of affective symptoms (attributable to the continued presence of cognitive dysfunction) once patients return to normal daily activities. Little is known, however, about longitudinal changes in cognitive function throughout depressive episodes and periods of remission, or the impact of cognitive dysfunction on symptomatic remission and functional recovery in patients with MDD.

    PERFORM (Prospective Epidemiological Research on Functioning Outcomes Related to Major Depressive Disorder; NCT01427439) was a 2-year, prospective, noninterventional cohort study of European patients with MDD, conducted in real-world settings in France, the UK, Spain, Germany, and Sweden [8,9]. The study aimed to investigate changes in cognitive function and functional outcomes during depressive episodes. The findings suggest that perceived cognitive dysfunction is linked with poor overall functioning, including reductions in work productivity and impairment in quality of life. Moreover, the relationships between cognition and functional outcomes were not fully explained by changes in severity of depressive symptoms [8]. Additionally, depressive symptoms and disturbances in self-perceived cognition followed different trajectories during treatment with antidepressants; improvements in cognitive function were more gradual than improvements in mood symptoms, with a lesser magnitude [8].

    The same investigators reported a significant association between residual subjective cognitive deficit (assessed using the five-item Perceived Deficit Questionnaire [PDQ-5] [10]) and subsequent relapse (assessed 6 months later) in MDD patients whose symptoms had remitted during treatment for 2 months [9]. In fact, the odds of relapse increased by 12% with each unit increase in PDQ-5 score. Based on these observations, the authors concluded that residual mood symptoms may identify patients at risk of relapse, and that interventions to reduce residual cognitive dysfunction may potentially reduce the risk of relapse of depressive symptoms [9]. Due to regulations around noninterventional studies in Europe, PERFORM employed patient-rated scales but limited application of physician-rated measures. However, reports by patients do not always correlate well with physician-rated outcomes [11,12].

    Results from the World Mental Health Japan Survey suggest that the male to female ratios in both prevalence and persistence of depression in Japan are different from those reported in Western countries: prevalence is higher in middle-aged men, while persistence is higher among women and younger groups [1]. Furthermore, treatment rates in Japan are lower than those in high-income Western countries, which may be partially explained by less health service expenditure, [13] and partially by the stigma associated with mental illnesses in Japan [1]. Such differences suggest that the findings of the PERFORM study may not be extrapolated to Japanese patients and warrant further investigation. To our knowledge, no studies have explored longitudinal changes in cognitive function and higher-level functional outcomes during treatment of Japanese patients with MDD [14]. To increase awareness of cognitive dysfunction in depression in Japan, we have designed a prospective observational study (PERFORM-J; UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000024320), based on the original PERFORM study. Since patient-rated and physician-rated measures seem to represent qualitatively different aspects of cognition and psychosocial function, both tools are used in PERFORM-J to explore longitudinal changes in cognitive function and other aspects of functional outcomes in Japanese patients with MDD.


    Study Objectives

    The primary objective of PERFORM-J is to examine longitudinal changes in cognitive function and depressive symptoms in patients with MDD over a period of 6 months, following the start of treatment with an antidepressant in routine clinical practice. Secondary objectives are (1) to determine the number of patients with cognitive dysfunction and/or depressive symptoms across the study period; (2) to examine the relationship between cognitive disturbance and psychosocial function and work productivity or activity impairment; and (3) to compare quality of life and utilization of healthcare resources longitudinally, between patients with different severities of cognitive dysfunction. Additional exploratory objectives are (1) to determine whether the presence of cognitive dysfunction is a risk factor for treatment refractory depressive symptoms at month 1, failure to achieve symptomatic remission at month 2 or 6, and relapse of depressive symptoms at month 6; and (2) to investigate the association between cognitive dysfunction and functional capacity.

    Patients

    Eligible participants are Japanese outpatients aged 18-65 years with a recurrent or new diagnosis of a major depressive episode (as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision [DSM-IV-TR]), who initiate a new antidepressant as monotherapy (a tricyclic or tetracyclic antidepressant, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, or noradrenergic and/or serotonergic antidepressant) either as first-line therapy or switching from a previous antidepressant, based on the judgement of their physician. The baseline visit is defined as a clinic visit at which the new antidepressant is initiated. The full eligibility criteria are shown in Textbox 1. Eligible patients are enrolled during the first visit (visit 1). As the study is conducted during routine clinical practice, following enrollment (on initiation of a new antidepressant as monotherapy) subsequent addition of other antidepressants (and subsequent dose modification) is permitted during the study period, and use of other concomitant medications is permitted. The dosage and administration of antidepressants are in accordance with general prescribing instructions.

    Assessments

    During the baseline visit, informed consent is obtained, and eligibility to participate in the study is determined (according to the criteria in Textbox 1). Demographic data are then collected, before the new antidepressant is prescribed, as detailed in Table 1. Information on the management of MDD and utilization of healthcare resources is also collected at each subsequent visit.

    Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    Inclusion criteria

    1. An outpatient.
    2. Aged between 18 and 65 years at the time of giving informed consent.
    3. With a recurrent or new diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV-TR); the diagnosis is confirmed using the Major Depressive Episode module of the Mini International Psychiatric Interview (MINI) [15].
    4. Initiating a new antidepressant as monotherapy (a tricyclic or tetracyclic antidepressant, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, a serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, or a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant) at the baseline visit (either as first-line therapy or after switching from a previous antidepressant), as decided by the investigator.
    5. Capable of understanding the content of the clinical research and complying with the research protocol requirements (in the opinion of the investigator)
    6. Capable of signing and dating an informed consent form, before initiation of the clinical research procedures.
    7. Capable of reading and understanding the research questionnaires.

    Exclusion criteria

    1. A concurrent diagnosis or history of any of the following conditions:
      • schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders
      • bipolar disorder
      • dementia, or any other neurodegenerative disease
      • substance dependence, including dependence on alcohol and other drugs, but not including mild and moderate nicotine dependence; patients with severe nicotine dependence are excluded
      • any psychiatric disorder due to a general medical condition or substance misuse.
    2. A prescription for more than one antidepressant on the day of the baseline visit (for example, a combination of two or more antidepressants).
    3. An antipsychotic prescription on the day of the baseline visit.
    4. A prescription for a mood stabilizer on the day of the baseline visit.
    5. Current treatment with electroconvulsive therapy or repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    6. Pregnant or breastfeeding (female patients) at the beginning of the study.
    7. Acute suicidality (in the opinion of the investigator).
    8. Currently enrolled in an interventional clinical research study, such as a clinical trial.
    9. A workmate of the investigator or his/her immediate family, or a subordinate of the investigator or their immediate family.
    10. Prior enrolment in the study.
    11. Unlikely to comply with the protocol (in the opinion of the investigator).
    Textbox 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
    Table 1. Data collection (DSM-IV-TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV; MDD: Major Depressive Disorder; VAS: visual-analogue scores).
    Data to be collectedDetails
    Demographic informationAge; gender; weight; height; use of tobacco; marital status; living area; educational level; employment status
    MDD historyNumber of depressive episodes; timing and treatment of previous depressive episode; history of suicide attempts and hospitalizations for depression; concomitant mental and somatic conditions (including diagnosis and treatment, if relevant)
    Management of current episode of MDDAntidepressant treatments prescribed; concomitant psychotropic treatments; use of psychotherapy
    Utilization of healthcare resourcesNumber of visits to physicians or other health care professionals; hospitalizations (duration; ward; relationship to depression) and absences from employment due to illness (duration and relationship to depression) due to any problems (not limited to MDD symptoms)
    Life eventsOccurrence of critical life events (eg, death of a family member/relative; unemployment, relocation)
    Physician-rated assessments

    		Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) [15]Brief structured diagnostic interview for major Axis I psychiatric disorders in DSM-IV-TR. Diagnosis of major depressive episode confirmed using “Major Depressive Episode” module

    		Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scale [17]Patient\'s current state of mental illness, according to the physician’s experience. 7-point scale from 1 (normal; not at all ill;) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients)

    		Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) [18]Severity of depressive episodes. 10 items rated from 0 (normal findings or absence of symptoms) to 6 (severe depressive symptoms). Total score=0–60 (higher score=more severe depression). Remission indicated by score ≤10

    		Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) [16,25]Speed of psychomotor performance (visual perception, spatial decision-making, and motor skills). The task is to match 133 digits with simple symbols in 120 seconds. Correct answers are counted; score=0–133

    		University of California, San Diego, Performance-based Skills Assessment-Brief (UPSA-B)a [19,26]Functional skills in patients with mental illness (brief version of the role-play-based performance test battery). Two subscales (managing finances and communication with others); raw scores are rescaled to a range of 0 to 100. Higher score=greater functional capability
    Patient-reported outcomes

    		Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9) [20,27]Depressive symptoms. 9 items rated from 0 (not all) to 3 (nearly every day). Total score=0 (absence of depression) to 27 (severe depression)

    		Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) [21]Disability assessed in three domains (work/school; social life/leisure activities; family life/home duties). Three discretized 10-point VAS from 0 (no disability) to 10 (extreme disability). The sum of scores provides a single measure of global functional impairment: range=0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired)

    		Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire [22]Work productivity/impairment in activity in past 7 days (6 items). Yields scores for: absenteeism; presenteeism; loss of work productivity; and impairment of activity. Outcomes are expressed as % impairment. Higher scores=worse outcomes

    		Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression (PDQ-D) [23]Perceived cognitive deficits in MDD patients. 20 items in 4 subscales: attention/concentration; retrospective memory; prospective memory: planning/organisation. Score=0 (never in past 7 days) to 4 (very often, more than once a day). Total score=sum of raw scores; range=0 to 80. High score=poorly perceived cognitive dysfunction

    		EuroQol 5-Dimensions, 5-Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) [24]Generic health status (preference-based measure of well-being). Five items: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, depression/anxiety, plus VAS for overall health state. Used to calculate a utility index: range=0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). VAS scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 100 (best health state)

    aTo be performed only in patients from preselected research sites (approximately 100 patients).

    At the beginning of the study (baseline; visit 1), month 1 (visit 2), month 2 (visit 3), and month 6 (visit 4), severity of the illness, depressive symptoms, and cognitive function are assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scale, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), respectively [16-18]. Functional capacity is evaluated for a subset of approximately 100 patients at selected sites using the University of California, San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment-Brief (UPSA-B) [19]. Additionally, all patients are asked to complete the following self-assessment questionnaires to evaluate subjective depressive symptoms, cognition, social function, and quality of life: the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9) [20]; Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) [21]; Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI) [22]; Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression (PDQ-D) [23]; and EuroQol5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) [24]. Details of all physician-rated and self-reported assessment tools are provided in Table 1. Validated Japanese versions of these assessment tools are used [25-27]. The same instruments are administered at each visit throughout the course of the study (Table 2). The investigators will inform the marketing authorization holders of each drug if suspected adverse events occur.

    The study is conducted in accordance with the ethical principles described in the Declaration of Helsinki and the Japanese Ethical Guideline for Clinical Research, as well as all other applicable laws and regulations. Ethical review committees are constituted according to the regulations and approve the study protocol at each site before commencement of the study. Patients are required to provide written informed consent and are free to withdraw from the study at any time.

    Statistical Analysis

    The analysis population will comprise all eligible patients who complete at least one DSST assessment during the study period. Analyses will be based on observed cases, with no imputation of missing data.

    For the primary analyses, changes from baseline at each assessment time point will be calculated for DSST and MADRS scores. Individual DSST scores will be allocated to one of four categories, as follows: within norm; 0.33-0.67 SD below norm; 0.67-1 SD below norm; or ≥1 SD below norm. Separately, DSST scores will be allocated to dichotomous (yes/no) categories as follows: within norm; ≥0.33 SD below norm; ≥0.67 SD below norm; ≥1 SD below norm. All cutoff values will be adjusted for the patient’s age at baseline, as described in the Wechsler Adult Intelligent Scale - Third Edition (Japanese translation) [25]. MADRS scores will be categorized as none, mild, moderate or severe, as previously described [28,29].

    Table 2. Schedule of assessments (CGI-S: Clinical Global Impression-Severity; DSST: Digit Symbol Substitution Test; EQ-5D-5L: EuroQoL 5-Dimensions, 5-levels Questionnaire; MADRS: Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; MDD: Major Depressive Disorder; MINI: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview; PDQ-D: Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression; PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item; SDS: Sheehan Disability Scale; UPSA-B: University of California, San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment-Brief; WPAI: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire).
    Study visit1234
    Approximate time of visit, monthsBaselineMonth 1Month 2Month 6
    Approximate time of visit, daysDay 1Day 29Day 57Day 169
    Allowance, daysa122 to 3643 to 71141 to 197
    Patient information/consentXb


    DemographicsX


    MDD historyX


    Occurrence of life eventsX


    MDD managementXXXX
    Healthcare resource useXXXX
    Physician-rated assessments

    		CGI-SXXXX

    		MINIX



    		MADRSXXXX

    		DSSTX
    		XX

    		UPSA-BcX
    		XX
    Patient-reported outcomes

    		PHQ-9XXXX

    		SDSXXXX

    		WPAIXXXX

    		PDQ-DXXXX

    		EQ-5D-5LXXXX

    aThe starting date of antidepressant treatment (ie, the first day of administration) is defined as Day 1.

    bInformed consent is required before any clinical research procedures are performed.

    cConducted only in patients at preselected research sites (approximately 100 patients).

    For the secondary analyses, changes from baseline at each assessment time point will be calculated for SDS, WPAI, UPSA-B, PDQ-D and EQ-5D-5L scores. The association between cognitive function and depressive symptoms will be assessed using the DSST and MADRS categories at each visit. Correlations between DSST scores and SDS, WPAI, and EQ-5D-5L scores (individually) will be calculated using Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients. SDS, WPAI, UPSA-B, and EQ-5D-5L scores at each assessment point will be compared using analysis of variance models, according to the DSST category at baseline. Similar analysis will be performed for PDQ-D as the primary measure of cognitive function (scores will be allocated to one of four categories; the cutoffs being based on quartiles).

    As an exploratory investigation, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses will be conducted to determine whether the presence of cognitive dysfunction is a predictor of response, remission, and relapse of depressive symptoms. Patients with a ≥50% reduction from baseline in MADRS score at month 1 are categorized as treatment responders. Patients with a MADRS score of ≤10 at month 2 and/or 6 are categorized as having achieved symptomatic remission. Patients who achieved remission at an earlier visit and have a MADRS score ≥22 at month 6 are categorized as having relapsed in terms of depressive symptoms. Factors for the logistic regression analyses (eg, DSST score, PDQ-D score, MADRS score, age, gender, educational level, and employment status), will be selected for their clinical relevance based on the literature [9]. Exploratory analyses will also evaluate correlations between scores on the UPSA-B, DSST, WPAI (if the sample size allows), EQ-5D-5L, and MADRS scales. Statistical tests will be two-sided at the 5% significance level, if not otherwise specified.

    In subgroup analyses, all data will be summarized according to the MADRS category at baseline, and according to age group.

    A target sample size of 500 patients was estimated in order to ensure acceptable precision of the mean change from baseline in DSST scores at months 2 and 6. Based on two previous studies which investigated the effect of vortioxetine on cognitive function in MDD [30,31], assuming a standard deviation of 8.1 and a withdrawal rate of 25% at month 6, 500 enrolled patients will ensure a value of 0.82 for the half-width of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the change in DSST score from baseline to month 6.


    The PERFORM-J study began in September 2016. Patient enrollment was completed on June 30, 2017, with 523 patients having been enrolled from 48 sites, with the UPSA-B assessment having been conducted on 141 patients. As of October 2017, 279 patients have completed the study.


    PERFORM-J is the first study conducted in Japan to prospectively evaluate longitudinal changes in cognitive function, depressive symptoms, and other functional outcomes in patients with MDD following the start of antidepressant therapy. The information obtained will shape our understanding of how antidepressants affect cognition in Japanese patients. Importantly, the study includes both physician- and patient-rated tests of cognitive function, administered to a large group of patients treated in accordance with current clinical practice in Japan. A noninterventional design was chosen to avoid interference with standard practice.

    The prospective design and the number of study sites should facilitate collection of data that is sufficient to represent the MDD population in Japan. The 6-month study period should be long enough to detect the effects of antidepressants on depressive symptoms. The study period will also allow detection of meaningful changes in functional outcomes and utilization of healthcare resources over time. In fact, the study design is similar to that of PROACT (Prospective Research Observation to Assess Cognition in Treated MDD patients), currently ongoing in China, and PERFORM-K in South Korea [32].

    Currently, cognitive function does not appear to be a major concern among Japanese psychiatrists who treat mood disorders. Therefore, the current study should provide valuable information to facilitate improvements in functional outcomes in patients with MDD.

    A major limitation of this study relates to the uncontrolled and observational study design, which does not allow evaluation of cause and effect relationships. Additionally, patients can take concomitant medication, potential effects of which on cognition cannot be excluded.

    In conclusion, we have described the protocol of a prospective, multi-center study of the longitudinal relationship between cognitive dysfunction, severity of depressive (mood) symptoms, and higher-level functional outcomes in Japanese patients with MDD. Results from PERFORM-J should provide valuable information regarding the potential of antidepressant monotherapy to improve symptoms and social functioning in such patients.

    Acknowledgments

    This study is funded by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Lundbeck Japan KK. The authors acknowledge the patients participating in this study and their families, as well as staff at all investigational sites. Medical writing support was funded by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and was provided by Michael Simpson, PhD, CMPP of FireKite, an Ashfield company, part of UDG Healthcare plc; in accordance with Good Publication Practice 3 ethical guidelines (Battisti et al. Ann Intern Med 2015). Takeda and Lundbeck were involved in the design of this study and contributed to the development and approval of the present manuscript. The final decision to submit the paper was made by the authors.

    Conflicts of Interest

    TS reports honoraria received for advisory boards/lectures/papers and/or research funding from Takeda Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Lundbeck, and NeuroCog Trials. KW reports consultancies undertaken for Eli Lilly, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical; honoraria received from Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, MSD, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Shionogi, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Tsumura Pharmaceutical, and Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical; and grants received from Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, MSD, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, and Takeda Pharmaceutical. SN reports research grants received from Crecon Medical Assessment Inc. SS and SO are employees of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. YM is an employee of Lundbeck Japan KK.

    1. Ishikawa H, Kawakami N, Kessler RC, World Mental Health Japan Survey Collaborators. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence, severity and unmet need for treatment of common mental disorders in Japan: results from the final dataset of World Mental Health Japan Survey. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2016 Jun;25(3):217-229 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Kessler RC, Birnbaum HG, Shahly V, Bromet E, Hwang I, McLaughlin KA, et al. Age differences in the prevalence and co-morbidity of DSM-IV major depressive episodes: results from the WHO World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Depress Anxiety 2010 Apr;27(4):351-364 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Lam RW, Kennedy SH, Mclntyre RS, Khullar A. Cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder: effects on psychosocial functioning and implications for treatment. Can J Psychiatry 2014 Dec;59(12):649-654 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. MacQueen GM, Memedovich KA. Cognitive dysfunction in major depression and bipolar disorder: Assessment and treatment options. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2017 Jan;71(1):18-27. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Papakostas GI, Ionescu DF. Updates and trends in the treatment of major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2014 Dec;75(12):1419-1421. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Srisurapanont M, Bautista D, Chen C, Wang G, Udomratn P, Eurviriyanukul K. Subjective memory and concentration deficits in medication-free, non-elderly Asians with major depressive disorder: prevalence and their correlates. J Affect Disord 2015 Jan 15;171:105-110. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Iga J-I, Uchiyama M, Ohmori T, Ogasawara K, Ozaki N, Kanba S, Saito T, Sugyiyama N, Suzuki M, Tomita M, Nakamura T, Nomura S, Furihata R, Watanabe K. The Japanese Society of Mood Disorders Treatment Guideline. 2016. The Japanese Society of Mood Disorders Treatment Guideline   URL: http://www.secretariat.ne.jp/jsmd/mood_disorder/img/160731.pdf [accessed 2018-04-23] [WebCite Cache]
    8. Hammer-Helmich L, Haro JM, Jönsson B, Tanguy MA, Di Nicola S, Chollet J, et al. Functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorder: the 2-year PERFORM study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2018;14:239-249 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Saragoussi D, Touya M, Haro JM, Jönsson B, Knapp M, Botrel B, et al. Factors associated with failure to achieve remission and with relapse after remission in patients with major depressive disorder in the PERFORM study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2017;13:2151-2165 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Sullivan JJL, Edgley K, Dehoux E. A survey of multiple sclerosis. Part 1: Perceived cognitive problems and compensatory strategy use. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1990;4:99-105.
    11. Carvalho AF, Miskowiak KK, Hyphantis TN, Kohler CA, Alves GS, Bortolato B, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in depression - pathophysiology and novel targets. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2014;13(10):1819-1835. [Medline]
    12. Svendsen AM, Kessing LV, Munkholm K, Vinberg M, Miskowiak KW. Is there an association between subjective and objective measures of cognitive function in patients with affective disorders? Nord J Psychiatry 2012 Sep;66(4):248-253. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Wang PS, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Borges G, Bromet EJ, et al. Use of mental health services for anxiety, mood, and substance disorders in 17 countries in the WHO world mental health surveys. Lancet 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):841-850 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Hidaka S, Ikejima C, Kodama C, Nose M, Yamashita F, Sasaki M, et al. Prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms among older Japanese people: comorbidity of mild cognitive impairment and depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012 Mar;27(3):271-279. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34. [Medline]
    16. Weschsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third Edition. San Antonio, Texas: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
    17. Guy W, National Institute of Mental Health. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology Revised, 1976. Rockville, Maryland: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1976.   URL: https://archive.org/details/ecdeuassessmentm1933guyw [accessed 2018-04-23] [WebCite Cache]
    18. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979 Apr;134:382-389. [Medline]
    19. Mausbach BT, Harvey PD, Goldman SR, Jeste DV, Patterson TL. Development of a brief scale of everyday functioning in persons with serious mental illness. Schizophr Bull 2007 Nov;33(6):1364-1372 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001 Sep;16(9):606-613 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    21. Sheehan DV, Harnett-Sheehan K, Raj BA. The measurement of disability. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1996 Jun;11 Suppl 3:89-95. [Medline]
    22. Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics 1993 Nov;4(5):353-365. [Medline]
    23. Lam R, Saragoussi D, Danchenko N, Rive B, Lamy F, Brevig T. Psychometric Validation of Perceived Deficits Questionnaire – Depression (PDQ-D) in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Value in Health 2013 Nov;16(7):A330. [CrossRef]
    24. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-1736 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Weshler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligent Scale - Third Edition. In: Wechsler Adult Intelligent Scale - Third Edition. [Japanese translation: Publication Committee of Japanese version of WAIS-III]. Tokyo, Japan: Nihon Bunka Kagakusha Co. Ltd; 2006.
    26. Sumiyoshi C, Takaki M, Okahisa Y, Patterson TL, Harvey PD, Sumiyoshi T. Utility of the UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment-Brief Japanese version: discriminative ability and relation to neurocognition. Schizophr Res Cogn 2014 Sep;1(3):137-143 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Muramatsu K, Miyaoka H, Kamijima K, Muramatsu Y, Yoshida M, Otsubo T, et al. The patient health questionnaire, Japanese version: validity according to the mini-international neuropsychiatric interview-plus. Psychol Rep 2007 Dec;101(3 Pt 1):952-960. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Herrmann N, Black SE, Lawrence J, Szekely C, Szalai JP. The Sunnybrook Stroke Study: a prospective study of depressive symptoms and functional outcome. Stroke 1998 Mar;29(3):618-624 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    29. Snaith RP, Harrop FM, Newby DA, Teale C. Grade scores of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression and the Clinical Anxiety Scales. Br J Psychiatry 1986 May;148:599-601. [Medline]
    30. Mahableshwarkar AR, Zajecka J, Jacobson W, Chen Y, Keefe RSE. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Active-Reference, Double-Blind, Flexible-Dose Study of the Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Function in Major Depressive Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015 Jul;40(8):2025-2037 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. McIntyre RS, Lophaven S, Olsen CK. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vortioxetine on cognitive function in depressed adults. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2014 Oct;17(10):1557-1567 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Kim JM, Chalem Y, di Nicola S, Hong JP, Won SH, Milea D. A cross-sectional study of functional disabilities and perceived cognitive dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder in South Korea: The PERFORM-K study. Psychiatry Res 2016 Dec 30;239:353-361 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    CGI-S: Clinical Global Impression - Severity
    DSM-IV-TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision
    DSST: Digit Symbol Substitution Test
    EQ-5D-5L: EuroQoL 5-Dimensions, 5-levels
    MADRS: Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
    MDD: Major Depressive Disorder
    MINI: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
    PDQ-5: Perceived Deficit Questionnaire-5 item
    PDQ-D: Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression
    PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item
    SDS: Sheehan Disability Scale
    UPSA-B: University of California, San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment-Brief
    VAS: Visual Analog Scale
    WPAI: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 22.12.17; peer-reviewed by T Campellone, B Baune; comments to author 25.01.18; revised version received 14.03.18; accepted 31.03.18; published 25.06.18

    Copyright

    ©Tomiki Sumiyoshi, Koichiro Watanabe, Shinichi Noto, Shigeru Sakamoto, Yoshiya Moriguchi, Shuichi Okamoto. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 25.06.2018.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.