RefCheck Maintenance Notice

On Monday, December 3, 2018, from 16:00-18:00 EST, RefCheck will be undergoing maintenance. RefCheck is the process where, during copyediting, all references are extracted from the manuscript file, parsed, matched against various databases (eg, PubMed and CrossRef), and automatically corrected. For more information on RefCheck, please visit our Knowledge Base.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 20.10.17 in Vol 6, No 10 (2017): October

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Protocol

    Epidemiology of Hepatitis C Virus Among People Who Inject Drugs: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    1Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, United States

    2Center for Drug Use and HIV Research, New York University, New York, NY, United States

    Corresponding Author:

    Daniel J Smith, MA

    Rory Meyers College of Nursing

    New York University

    433 First Avenue, Floor 7

    New York, NY,

    United States

    Phone: 1 212 992 7075

    Email:


    ABSTRACT

    Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a persistent epidemic among people who inject drugs (PWID), and PWID remain as the population experiencing the most significant impact of HCV-related morbidity and mortality worldwide.

    Objective: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to synthesize data on the epidemiology of HCV infection among PWID. Our main objectives are to characterize the global and regional distribution and determinants of HCV infection among PWID.

    Methods: A search strategy is conducted that involves both the electronic and manual retrievals of literature. Reports are included in this review if they present data published between 2006 and 2015 on prevalent or incident HCV infection among current or former PWID. Standard meta-analytic techniques are performed to synthesize the pooled data and identify correlates of HCV infection.

    Results: The search strategy has been performed, and data collection is in progress. Data analysis will follow, and the final results of this systematic review/meta-analysis are expected by December 2017.

    Conclusions: This article describes the protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiology of HCV among PWID. We aim to provide synthesized data on HCV incidence and prevalence as well as to identify factors associated with HCV transmission. Our research contributes empirical evidence that informs scholarly, medical, and policy discussions concerning HCV.

    Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42016035687; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.asp? ID=CRD42016035687 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6ttYLn65N)

    JMIR Res Protoc 2017;6(10):e201

    doi:10.2196/resprot.7936

    KEYWORDS

    Crowdfunding campaign to support this specific research

    We help JMIR researchers to raise funds to pursue their research and development aimed at tackling important health and technology challenges. If you would like to show your support for this author, please donate using the button below. The funds raised will directly benefit the corresponding author of this article (minus 8% admin fees). Your donations will help this author to continue publishing open access papers in JMIR journals. Donations of over $100 may also be acknowledged in future publications.

    keyboard with crowdfunding key instead of enter key

    Suggested contribution levels: $20/$50/$100



    Introduction

    Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a persistent epidemic among people who inject drugs (PWID), and PWID remain as the population experiencing the most significant impact of HCV-related morbidity and mortality worldwide [1]. In countries where infection control procedures (which include the systematic screening of blood and blood products) have been implemented, injection drug use is the primary means of HCV transmission [1-2]. Conversely, in countries where procedures to prevent the spread of bloodborne pathogens in health care settings have been less systematically adopted, the spread of HCV has been largely due to nosocomial and iatrogenic causes [3]. Both means of HCV acquisition contribute to an increasing global burden of HCV, and the World Health Organization now estimates that 3% of the world’s population is infected with HCV [4].

    Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR/MAs) are increasingly being used to inform public health policy and guide allocation of resources to improve population health outcomes. Previous SR/MAs of HCV epidemiology in PWID generated country-specific estimates of prevalent HCV infection (ranging between 10% and 91%) and summarized HCV incidence rates among PWID in Europe (3 to 66/100 person-years) [5-6].

    In general, the public health response has not yet matched the pace at which HCV is spreading with respect to primary prevention; HCV prevalence remains high despite the availability of more tolerable and efficacious treatment [7-8]. Additional research and resources are necessary to improve treatment and prevention strategies that address the HCV epidemic among PWID globally. Indeed, individual-level risk behavior during drug injection also has implications for controlling coinfection, especially with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV).

    This article describes the protocol for an SR/MA of the epidemiology of HCV infection among PWID. Our main objectives in the SR/MA are to synthesize global and regional HCV incidence and prevalence and synthesize determinants of HCV infection among PWID.

    The SR/MA examines a range of topics on the epidemiology of HCV among PWID. In particular, we assess the following: time to HCV seroconversion subsequent to the onset of drug injection, updating estimates from a previous SR/MA [9]; trends in incidence and prevalence by geographic region; the effect of harm reduction (ie, substance use treatment and syringe/drug injection equipment access programs) on disease burden; and associations between HCV infection and PWID characteristics. Findings in these areas will be interpreted in relation to public health policy.


    Methods

    This protocol is consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol 2015 statement (see Multimedia Appendix 1) [10-11].

    Selection Criteria

    Reports are included in this review if they satisfy the following criteria:

    • Evaluated participants who reported current or previous injection drug use (ie, PWID)
    • Presented original data on HCV prevalence or incidence based on laboratory-confirmed HCV infection in a sample composed of at least 90% PWID
    • Published between January 1, 2006, and December 1, 2015

    We will exclude reports that are SR/MAs, present self-reported HCV data, or use simulated data.

    Participants

    The study population is PWID. We define active PWID as individuals who have injected within the past year, while former PWID are those whose most recent injection drug use occurred over 1 year prior to study admission. Reports that do not provide a detailed description of what constitutes a PWID will be analyzed as a separate group (thus producing 3 categories of PWID: active, former, and status nonspecified). If reports explicitly state that PWID are current or active (or use similar language to convey that PWID have recently injected drugs or are currently injecting drugs) but do not specify a time frame, then we will consider these PWID as active PWID.

    Outcome Measures

    The primary outcome is the frequency of HCV infection. We use 4 measures to capture disease distribution:

    1. Prevalence of HCV infection
    2. Incidence of HCV infection
    3. Incidence of HCV reinfection following spontaneous clearance
    4. Incidence of HCV reinfection following sustained virologic response to HCV treatment

    Prevalence and incidence are measured as proportions and rates, respectively, where possible.

    The preferred criteria for measuring prevalent HCV infection are both positive HCV antibody and HCV RNA test results. The alternative criterion is a single positive antibody marker.

    Detection of HCV antibody or RNA in a previously seronegative individual are the preferred criteria for determining incident HCV infection. The alternate criterion is RNA positivity in an antibody-negative individual [12].

    Measuring incident reinfection subsequent to spontaneous clearance or sustained virologic response is similar. The preferred criterion is a change in the HCV genotype from the cleared infection (either spontaneously or through treatment) to the recently acquired infection over consecutive tests. In the absence of genotype testing, conversion from RNA negative to RNA positive over multiple tests is the alternative criterion.

    Secondary outcomes examined are associations between exposures and HCV incidence or prevalence. Exposures include biological and environmental factors such as HIV coinfection, sex, and geographic location.

    Search Strategy

    Literature is searched electronically and manually. Electronic searches using a string consisting of terms related to HCV, epidemiology, and PWID are undertaken in 4 databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Excerpta Medica database, ProQuest, and PubMed (see Multimedia Appendices 2-5). Results are filtered by date of publication (01/01/2006), record type (peer-reviewed journal), and language (English). Manual searches are performed on reference lists of eligible reports and other relevant papers, conference materials, and research study websites.

    Report Selection

    Reports are assessed for inclusion through 3 stages. First, each unique record in the deduplicated set of literature, all of which is retrieved from the search strategy, is screened by title and abstract to determine if it meets the eligibility criteria. Second, for every report that is considered eligible, the full text is subsequently screened. Reports that did not meet the criteria at either of these 2 stages are excluded from further consideration. Third, following data extraction, a final assessment is made on the admissibility of each report.

    Report Appraisal

    The quality of reports is determined through the use of an adapted version of the Quality In Prognosis Studies instrument developed by Hayden et al [13-14]. The instrument, which was modified for 2 previous SR/MAs [15-16], evaluates potential sources of bias, such as selection, misclassification, and confounding, in a report; it is also used to evaluate all study designs (eg, cross-sectional, prospective and retrospective cohort, randomized controlled trial).

    Quality Assurance

    Two research assistants, both with graduate training in epidemiologic research, systematic review methodology, and biostatistics, perform the literature search and identify eligible reports. Screening and coding pilots are conducted to evaluate intercoder reliability and refine the protocols governing report eligibility and data extraction. The research assistants independently review, code, and appraise all literature, which is subsequently evaluated by the principal investigator and the project director. The principal investigator and project director resolve any issues that emerge throughout the study selection and data extraction processes. The data for all included reports are aggregated into an electronic database that is managed by the research assistants, project director, and principal investigator. The research team is guided by the study protocol that they developed at the start of the project. This SR/MA is registered at PROSPERO [CRD42016035687].

    Data Analysis

    The meta-analysis synthesizes report-level data that are collected on the following domains: study cohort, period, and geographic location; study design and methods; HCV incidence, prevalence, and reinfection; and participant characteristics, particularly factors understood to be associated with HCV infection (eg, age, sex, and duration of drug injection). We assess subgroups and the sensitivity of results—determined by report attributes, participant factors, and report quality—and, at each stage, heterogeneity, using Cochran Q and I2. Summary estimates of the primary outcomes are derived using random-effects meta-analysis techniques. Meta-regression models assess the association between characteristics of the study or the sample (eg, location, time period, study quality, safe injection behavior, age, race/ethnicity) and HCV incidence and prevalence. Measures of relative effect are calculated, where possible. Data analysis is conducted in Stata (StataCorp LLC), and data visualization is performed in R (The R Foundation).


    Results

    The search strategy has been performed, and data collection is in progress. Data analysis will follow, and the final results of this SR/MA are expected by December 2017.


    Discussion

    This article describes the protocol for the SR/MA of the epidemiology of HCV among PWID. We will present global and regional estimates of incident and prevalent HCV infection, and we expect to produce results that identify correlates of incidence and prevalence. Our research contributes empirical evidence that informs scholarly, medical, and policy discussions concerning HCV. Moreover, because the risk behavior of PWIDs is a common route of infection for the transmission of other bloodborne viruses, this review also has implications for research in HIV and HBV.

    Acknowledgments

    This study is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 DA034637 and P30 DA011041).

    Authors' Contributions

    HH designed the study. HH, AEJ, DJS, and JN developed and refined the study protocol. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. DJS is the guarantor.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol checklist: recommended items to address in a systematic review protocol.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 55KB

    Multimedia Appendix 2

    Search strategy for Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (via EBSCOhost).

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 6KB

    Multimedia Appendix 3

    Search strategy for Excerpta Medica database (via Ovid).

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 6KB

    Multimedia Appendix 4

    Search strategy for ProQuest.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 6KB

    Multimedia Appendix 5

    Search strategy for PubMed.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 6KB

    Multimedia Appendix 6

    Summary statement of the grant and assessment of the study.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 121KB

    References

    1. Alter MJ. HCV routes of transmission: what goes around comes around. Semin Liver Dis 2011 Nov;31(4):340-346. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Averhoff FM, Glass N, Holtzman D. Global burden of hepatitis C: considerations for healthcare providers in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2012 Jul;55 Suppl 1:S10-S15. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Hauri AM, Armstrong GL, Hutin YJF. The global burden of disease attributable to contaminated injections given in health care settings. Int J STD AIDS 2004 Jan;15(1):7-16. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Mohd HK, Groeger J, Flaxman AD, Wiersma ST. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: new estimates of age-specific antibody to HCV seroprevalence. Hepatology 2013 Apr;57(4):1333-1342. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Nelson PK, Mathers BM, Cowie B, Hagan H, Des JD, Horyniak D, et al. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in people who inject drugs: results of systematic reviews. Lancet 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):571-583 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Wiessing L, Ferri M, Grady B, Kantzanou M, Sperle I, Cullen KJ, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection epidemiology among people who inject drugs in Europe: a systematic review of data for scaling up treatment and prevention. PLoS One 2014;9(7):e103345 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Rice CM, Saeed M. Hepatitis C: treatment triumphs. Nature 2014 Jun 05;510(7503):43-44. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. AASLD/IDSA HCV Guidance Panel. Hepatitis C guidance: AASLD-IDSA recommendations for testing, managing, and treating adults infected with hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 2015 Sep;62(3):932-954. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Hagan H, Pouget ER, Des Jarlais DC, Lelutiu-Weinberger C. Meta-regression of hepatitis C virus infection in relation to time since onset of illicit drug injection: the influence of time and place. Am J Epidemiol 2008 Nov 15;168(10):1099-1109 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015 Jan;4:1 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015 Jan 02;349:g7647 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    12. Page K, Hahn JA, Evans J, Shiboski S, Lum P, Delwart E, et al. Acute hepatitis C virus infection in young adult injection drug users: a prospective study of incident infection, resolution, and reinfection. J Infect Dis 2009 Oct 15;200(8):1216-1226 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Hayden JA, Côté P, Bombardier C. Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 2006 Mar 21;144(6):427-437. [Medline]
    14. Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, Côté P, Bombardier C. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med 2013 Feb 19;158(4):280-286. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Smith DJ, Combellick J, Jordan AE, Hagan H. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease progression in people who inject drugs (PWID): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Drug Policy 2015 Oct;26(10):911-921 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Smith DJ, Jordan AE, Frank M, Hagan H. Spontaneous viral clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among people who inject drugs (PWID) and HIV-positive men who have sex with men (HIV+ MSM): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2016 Sep 05;16:471 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2015.
    18. R Foundation. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation; 2017.
    19. Statistical Computing. 2016.   URL: https://www.r-project.org/ [accessed 2017-09-30] [WebCite Cache]


    Abbreviations

    HBV: hepatitis B virus
    HCV: hepatitis C virus
    HIV: human immunodeficiency virus
    PWID: people who inject drugs
    SR/MA: systematic review/meta-analysis


    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 27.04.17; peer-reviewed by X Ling, J Usher-Smith; comments to author 12.07.17; revised version received 19.07.17; accepted 23.08.17; published 20.10.17

    ©Daniel J Smith, Josh Neurer, Ashly E Jordan, Holly Hagan. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 20.10.2017.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.