RefCheck Maintenance Notice

On Monday, December 3, 2018, from 16:00-18:00 EST, RefCheck will be undergoing maintenance. RefCheck is the process where, during copyediting, all references are extracted from the manuscript file, parsed, matched against various databases (eg, PubMed and CrossRef), and automatically corrected. For more information on RefCheck, please visit our Knowledge Base.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 16.08.13 in Vol 2, No 2 (2013): Jul-Dec

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Structured Reporting Web Tool for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/resprot.2417):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Lee RK, Cerniglia B, Reilly T. Using auto population of X-ray procedure exam type in radiology reports to decrease reporting errors. Clinical Imaging 2018;50:208
    CrossRef
  2. Meuschke M, Gunther T, Wickenhofer R, Gross M, Preim B, Lawonn K. Management of Cerebral Aneurysm Descriptors based on an Automatic Ostium Extraction. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2018;38(3):58
    CrossRef
  3. Schöppe F, Sommer WH, Schmidutz F, Pförringer D, Armbruster M, Paprottka KJ, Plum JLV, Sabel BO, Meinel FG, Sommer NN. Structured reporting of x-rays for atraumatic shoulder pain: advantages over free text?. BMC Medical Imaging 2018;18(1)
    CrossRef
  4. Price A, Liew SM, Kirkpatrick J, Price J, Lopreto T, Nelken Y. Mind the gap in clinical trials: A participatory action analysis with citizen collaborators. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2017;23(1):178
    CrossRef
  5. Hinderer M, Boeker M, Wagner SA, Lablans M, Newe S, Hülsemann JL, Neumaier M, Binder H, Renz H, Acker T, Prokosch H, Sedlmayr M. Integrating clinical decision support systems for pharmacogenomic testing into clinical routine - a scoping review of designs of user-system interactions in recent system development. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2017;17(1)
    CrossRef
  6. Faggioni L, Coppola F, Ferrari R, Neri E, Regge D. Usage of structured reporting in radiological practice: results from an Italian online survey. European Radiology 2017;27(5):1934
    CrossRef
  7. Pysarenko K, Recht M, Kim D. Structured Reporting: A Tool to Improve Reimbursement. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2017;14(5):662
    CrossRef
  8. Rosenkrantz AB, Pujara AC, Taneja SS. Use of a Quality Improvement Initiative to Achieve Consistent Reporting of Level of Suspicion for Tumor on Multiparametric Prostate MRI. American Journal of Roentgenology 2016;206(5):1040
    CrossRef
  9. Vargas H. US perspective. Cancer Imaging 2015;15(Suppl 1):O3
    CrossRef
  10. Wibmer A, Vargas HA, Sosa R, Zheng J, Moskowitz C, Hricak H. Value of a Standardized Lexicon for Reporting Levels of Diagnostic Certainty in Prostate MRI. American Journal of Roentgenology 2014;203(6):W651
    CrossRef
  11. Gunderman RB, McNeive LR. Is Structured Reporting the Answer?. Radiology 2014;273(1):7
    CrossRef