Scaling Up a Diabetes Prevention Program in Geographically and Ethnoculturally Diverse Urban Regions of Canada: Protocol for a Hybrid Type 2 Implementation-Effectiveness Study

Introduction

The incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is continuing to rise worldwide [1,2] despite overwhelming evidence that this chronic disease is largely preventable [3-5]. As the fastest-growing chronic condition, T2D impacts an estimated 5.3 million Canadians [6], with estimated annual treatment costs of CAD $30 billion (a currency exchange rate of CAD $1=US $0.71 was applicable) [7]. An additional 6 million Canadians [6] live with prediabetes, a clinical condition recognized by the World Health Organization that precedes T2D. Further, 70% of individuals with prediabetes are estimated to progress to T2D in the next 10 years [8]. Rates of T2D are higher in areas with lower household income and education level, higher levels of food insecurity, unemployment, immigrant status, and among individuals of African, South Asian, and Indigenous origins [7-10]. Racial, sex, and gender-based health inequities in accessing care exacerbate these barriers [11-16]. Preventing the progression of prediabetes to T2D and addressing health inequities is a public health priority in Canada [17].

T2D prevention programs (diabetes prevention program [DPPs]) have been shown to reduce the progression of prediabetes to T2D in diverse populations and geographic regions of the world. Three landmark trials involving more than 4000 individuals with prediabetes demonstrated that increasing physical activity (PA) and inducing modest weight loss through dietary intervention can reduce the risk of developing T2D by between 50% to 60% [18-20]. Notably, diet and PA approaches were twice as efficacious as pharmaceutical interventions [18]. However, translating these highly efficacious DPPs into community settings for public health impact often results in reduced effectiveness [21,22]. This drop in efficacy is often attributed to inequitable access [23,24], poor fidelity [25-29], lack of cultural tailoring [11,30-34], and lack of sustainability plans [30,35-37].

To date, no community-based nationwide DPP has been implemented across Canada. To make a measurable impact on T2D prevention at a population level, potent evidence-based interventions must be implemented effectively at scale. Nationwide uptake of DPPs is hindered by the absence of evidence-informed implementation plans tailored to local contexts [38] and the examination of individual- and between-delivery site differences to understand the impact of context on implementation. Site contextual differences are common, as each community has unique challenges and opportunities that impact implementation, and remain an understudied paradox of implementation efforts [39]. Additionally, equity-based contextual factors, including access and cultural relevance for populations traditionally underserved and racialized against, are pivotal considerations for implementation scale-up [40,41]. It is imperative to disaggregate multisite data and understand how community-, organization-, provider-, and client-level factors contribute to implementation outcomes when organizations deliver the same program in different contexts [41,42]. Implementation studies with a focus on context, and in particular health equity, are needed to compare within and between-site implementation outcomes and determinants [41]. Understanding these contextual factors is also key for identifying methods (implementation strategies) required to enhance the implementation and scale-up of DPPs [43].

Further limiting DPPs from achieving population-level health impact is a failure to prioritize and support the sustainability of these evidence-based programs after they have been implemented. Sustainability, defined as the continued use of program components at sufficient intensity for the sustained achievement of desirable program goals and population outcomes [44], is now considered “one of the most significant translational research problems of our time” [45]. Sustaining evidence-based interventions is imperative to assess long-term health outcomes, inform scale-up of implemented programs, avoid debilitating policy and ethical implications of abandoning funded effective interventions, and maintain community support and trust in research [44]. To maximize the public health impact of evidence-based interventions, it is critical to investigate the factors and processes that influence both implementation and sustainability of these interventions, and the health behaviors and outcomes they produce [44,46]. Adaptability, partnership with organizations delivering the intervention, and commitment from the community have been suggested as key factors in sustaining disease prevention programs [47,48]. The call for sustainable solutions to T2D prevention has yet to be answered [49], with no study to date examining how to sustain evidence-based DPPs in “real-world,” community contexts. Implementing and sustaining evidence-based DPPs has implications for substantially reducing the incidence of T2D in Canada, and beyond, and simultaneously fulfilling an important knowledge gap in implementation science.

Small Steps for Big Changes (SSBC) is an evidence-based DPP, consisting of behavior change techniques for diet and PA modification delivered in six 1-hour sessions. Since development in 2013, SSBC has been systematically scaled up from preliminary efficacy testing in a laboratory setting to real-world effectiveness trials in 1 urban and 5 rural community settings in British Columbia (BC) [37,50-55]. Our research to date has demonstrated that SSBC can be adapted for implementation in community settings, delivered in-person and virtually by “laypersons” with no specialized education or experience [56,57], and results in short- [58], medium- [52,59], and long-term behavior changes [60] (J Bourne et al, unpublished data, 2025) leading to clinically relevant improvements. Most notably, 41% of clients who participate in SSBC no longer have prediabetes (glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c] <5.7%; American Diabetes Association criteria) 1 year post program, with a further 16% on the cusp of no longer being prediabetic with HbA_1c levels of 5.7% (J Bourne et al, unpublished data, 2025).

Nationwide scale-up of SSBC presents a promising public health solution to equitably reach and improve the health of the growing number of Canadians who are at risk of developing T2D. As such, this project aims to evaluate the implementation, effectiveness, and sustainability of SSBC as it is scaled up nationwide across diverse urban communities in Canada. To address this aim, the project has three objectives (Figure 1): (1) To adapt and implement SSBC in diverse urban cities across Canada; (2) to examine the implementation (determinants, outcomes, and strategies), effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of SSBC; and (3) determine the sustainability (determinants and outcomes) of delivering SSBC in these contextually varied urban locations.

‎

Methods

Study Design and Procedures

A hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness study design [61] using multiple and mixed methods will be used to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of SSBC over 6 years (2024-2029). Years 1 and 2 will serve as a planning period (preimplementation phase). Specifically, SSBC will be adapted to the site and local contexts, recruitment and referral plans will be developed, and coaches will be trained to deliver SSBC. Years 2-4 will involve the delivery and monitoring of SSBC in diverse urban Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA) health and fitness facilities (implementation phase). Individuals who enroll in SSBC will be followed for 24 months after completion of the program (until the end of year 6). Data collected during the implementation phase will be used to guide the cocreation of sustainability models with partner organizations for continued delivery of SSBC in each municipality (sustainability phase in years 5 and 6; see Figure 2 for project timeline).

‎

Intervention

SSBC aims to empower individuals with prediabetes to make long-lasting diet and PA changes. Trained SSBC coaches meet with clients for 6 one-on-one sessions focused on PA, reducing intake of added sugar, improving carbohydrate choices, and preventing relapse, with each session followed by supervised aerobic exercise. Coaches use a motivational interviewing-informed approach to bolster client autonomy. The core components of the SSBC program can be found in Textbox 1, and specific behavior change techniques are published elsewhere [62].

SSBC Coach Training

SSBC is delivered by community-dwelling peers (eg, YMCA staff or volunteers and past clients) without postsecondary education or counseling experience requirements. All individuals who deliver SSBC complete coach training on an online platform, consisting of 7 asynchronous modules, a posttraining knowledge check, and a mock scenario. The mock scenario consists of a coach meeting with an SSBC staff member acting as a standardized client, where the coach must demonstrate correct delivery of intervention content and exercise protocols using a client-centered level of motivational interviewing. The current training was developed with feedback from SSBC coaches [63] and is effective and acceptable [64], with coaches retaining the learnt counseling skills over time (K Cranston et al, unpublished data, 2025).

Organization Implementation Sites

Eleven distinct regional YMCAs across 8 provinces in Canada will participate in this study (see Figure 3 for specific locations). In year 2, SSBC will be delivered in 11 initial implementation sites, one in each distinct YMCA region. Sites were purposively selected to maximize ethnocultural, population density, and socioeconomic diversity, as these contextual factors may influence implementation, effectiveness, and sustainability. Specifically, each site represents a region with high prediabetes prevalence, access to priority populations (operationalized in this project as health equity-owed groups who may face systemic barriers to access, opportunities, and resources to DPPs due to factors such as race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status; [11-16]), and staffing capacity to deliver SSBC within the organization. Each regional YMCA oversees several health and fitness facility buildings (often in distinct cities) into which SSBC delivery will scale up in years 3 and 4, for a total of 44 Canadian implementation sites.

‎

Each implementation site will select a staff member to act as the site lead for SSBC implementation. The role of each site lead will be to oversee all SSBC coaches and the day-to-day delivery of the program at their site. Senior leadership includes managerial staff (eg, chief executive officer) who are responsible for implementation, site selection, and will help identify site leads, but will not oversee the day-to-day operations of SSBC.

Data Collection

This study consists of 3 interconnected objectives, highlighted above, that align with the 3 phases of work. Data collection and analysis plans are outlined for each objective below.

Preimplementation Phase

Objective 1a: Adapt SSBC to Each Implementation Site

SSBC has been successfully implemented in 1 urban location in BC [36,50-52]. However, the implementation and sustainability of SSBC in other urban municipalities requires adaptation of these materials and processes. Site-level adaptations will ensure program content is relevant to the local context and delivery is compatible with each site, without altering the core, evidence-based principles of SSBC (Textbox 1). To maximize shared decision-making, an adaptation meeting will be held with each site in the preimplementation phase. This meeting will involve 1 site lead, a minimum of 1 YMCA coach, a regional research coordinator (member of the research team), and the research manager. In addition, regular meetings will be held between the regional research coordinator and the site lead during which program adaptations or the need to make program adaptations will be discussed. All adaptations will be captured using standard templates created by the research team. Site-specific adaptations will be reported and recorded by the research team on an ongoing basis during the implementation phase. Content analysis [65] using the FRAME (Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded) [66] will be used to classify adaptations and modifications to SSBC.

Objective 1b: Develop an Implementation Strategy Plan and Tracking System

This work will involve developing an implementation strategy plan, or “blueprint,” along with an associated toolkit that formally outlines the strategies for scaling up SSBC across Canada. Implementation strategies are the “methods or techniques used to enhance the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of a program” [43]. The development of this plan will be guided by the identification of barriers and facilitators to SSBC implementation from three sources: (1) findings from the delivery of SSBC at three YMCA facilities in an urban location in BC [50], (2) findings from the delivery of SSBC in five rural locations in BC (K Braaten et al, unpublished data, 2025), and (3) meetings with the research team and YMCA senior leadership in planning for the urban expansion of SSBC. Barriers and facilitators to implementation identified from the 3 sources will be matched to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) [67]. The CFIR–Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change matching tool [68] will be used to identify potential implementation strategies that can be used to address each identified factor. Each implementation strategy will be operationalized for the current context, and information on the actor (ie, who delivers the strategy), temporality (ie, when or at what time), and the targeted implementation outcome will be provided such that this information can be easily used by the delivery sites. This process will provide a rigorous and transparent method for linking implementation barriers and facilitators identified across diverse delivery settings to implementation strategies for use in the current project. Use of implementation strategies will be captured through regular meetings between the research team and each delivery site. Content analysis of regular meeting minutes will be conducted using the FRAME-IS (Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications for Implementation Strategies) [69]. In addition, reasons for implementation strategy adaptation, use, or exclusion will be captured. The integrated findings from objectives 1a and 1b will inform the development of each site’s sustainability planning in Objective 3.

Implementation Phase

Objective 2a: Examine the Implementation of SSBC and Associated Implementation Strategies

Implementation will be measured via 4 implementation outcomes at both the level of the intervention and implementation strategies within and between sites. These outcomes include (1) adoption, (2) reach, (3) dose delivered, and (4) fidelity. Table 1 details the implementation outcomes and determinants, how they are operationalized, the source, and the method of data collection. Table 2 provides details of data collection time points for each participant (ie, client, coach, site lead, etc) involved in this study.

In addition, the multilevel factors posited to influence intervention implementation and use of implementation strategies (ie, the implementation determinants) will be examined across multiple settings and contexts. This information will be captured qualitatively through monthly meetings between the research team and delivery sites and through one-on-one interviews with 2 coaches at each site, site leads (after 1 year of delivery), and senior leadership at each site (after 2 years of delivery). Interview guides will be guided by the CFIR [67] to understand the contextual factors, organizational factors, processes factors, implementer characteristics, and intervention characteristics that impact implementation.

Quantitatively, organizational readiness will be assessed at baseline [70] through surveys with site leads and coaches. Implementer satisfaction with the program will be captured using the Behavioral Interventionist Satisfaction Survey [71] and the Intervention Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility [72] measures during the delivery process. Client receptivity and satisfaction will be assessed quantitatively using the 8-item Theoretical Framework for Acceptability [73], a 7-item overall program satisfaction measure, and the 1-item net promoter score [74]. In addition, client interviews will be conducted with a purposive subsample (2-3 clients per site) post-SSBC completion to assess client satisfaction and acceptability. Program costs will be captured through monthly invoices and annual reports from sites.

Quantitative data from adoption, reach, dose, fidelity, program cost, and client and coach receptivity measures will be analyzed descriptively. Client demographics will be used to assess representativeness relative to people with prediabetes across Canada. SSBC program sessions will be audio-recorded using tablets with data saved on the University of British Columbia’s secure data research network in real-time; 2 program sessions per year from each coach will be randomly sampled and coded using an abbreviated version of the validated Motivational Interviewing Competency Assessment [75]. Motivational Interviewing Competency Assessment scores will be used to assess coach counseling fidelity, as done previously [57]. All implementation strategies used will be identified and classified according to definitions from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change project [76].

Qualitative data from interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using coding reliability thematic analysis [77]. This method aligns with the pragmatic research objectives for these interviews to assess satisfaction and acceptability (clients) and barriers and facilitators of implementation (delivery team), thereby supporting considerations of meaningful and methodological coherence [78]. Interviews will be deductively coded by 2 independent coders to increase the credibility and transferability of the findings with the aim of arriving at one objective truth [78]. Additionally, selecting an aim that will improve the practice of implementation efforts and offer significant contributions to the field further considers rigor and quality in qualitative inquiry [78].

Objective 2b: Examine the Effectiveness of SSBC

All clients will complete in-person measurements (weight and waist circumference) at baseline, 12-, and 24-month post program. At locations with an appropriate space (ie, walking track), cardiorespiratory fitness will also be assessed via a 6-minute walk test [79]. In addition, all clients will complete surveys at baseline, session 6, 12, and 24 months post program via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). Surveys will assess self-reported T2D status (12- and 24-months only [80,81]), moderate-to-vigorous PA, dietary intake, and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) [82]. Table 3 outlines the measures that will be used in the evaluation of SSBC effectiveness. Using an equity-focused lens, a prospective cohort subsample of clients (n=1285) will be followed across 24 months to evaluate the differential impact of SSBC on T2D status, assessed by change in HbA_1c, in addition to self-reported T2D status. All effectiveness outcomes will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. Hierarchical multivariable regression models will be used to assess the impact of SSBC on effectiveness outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders and accounting for within-subject and within-site clustering. Covariates (ie, sex, gender, and ethnicity) will be included to adjust for within-subject and within-site correlations. A sensitivity analysis using missing data imputation will be conducted to evaluate the potential impact of nonadherence on study outcomes. Data will be disaggregated to examine differences in effectiveness by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, municipality, sex, and gender within and between sites. For the subsample, a multilevel binary logistic regression will be used to examine differences in sociodemographic factors between those who do and do not experience a clinically significant reduction in HbA_1c at 24 months.

Objective 2c: Examine the Cost-Effectiveness of SSBC

The cost-effectiveness of SSBC will be determined using organizational data collected in objective 2a and client-level costs. Health-related client-level costs will be detailed using the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire [88] delivered in a survey. The Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire asks for specific details regarding health professional visits, admissions to the hospital, laboratory tests or investigations, and use of medications. On a per-client basis, costs will be assigned to health care resource use using a fully allocated hospital cost model (for in-patient costs) and provincial guides to medical fees (for outpatient costs) every 6 months to account for potential fluctuations in medical costs. The 5 dimensions of EQ-5D-5L will be converted into a weighted health state utility value that will provide weightings for quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and Canadian conversion tariffs for transforming health state profiles into utility scores [90]. QALYs are calculated based on the quality of life of a person (measured using health state utility values estimated from the EQ-5D-5L) in a given health state and the time spent in that health state. Incremental cost per client and effects generated by SSBC will be assessed using a Canadian health care system perspective. The outcome of cost-effectiveness analysis is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, where incremental cost-effectiveness ratio=Δ Cost/Δ HbA_1c and is the incremental cost of SSBC delivery per client. The outcome of our cost-utility analysis is the incremental cost-utility ratio, where incremental cost-utility ratio=Δ Cost/Δ QALY [91].

Sustainability Phase

Objective 3a: Cocreate Sustainability Models

In collaboration with the partnering YMCAs and affiliated municipality partners, the research team will engage in a process of codeveloping a feasible and reciprocally beneficial model of sustaining SSBC within each organization. Data from objectives 1 and 2 will be used to generate reports for each YMCA to directly inform this phase. Next, focus groups will be held at each site. Guided by the Integrated Sustainability Framework (ISF) [44], municipality-level models will establish which program components of SSBC will be continued (if at all), and at what intensity. Focus groups will also elucidate what factors result in the sustainment of evidence-based interventions in community settings. The outcome of this objective will be the development of a logic model of sustainment satisfactory to all parties.

Objective 3b: Examine SSBC Sustainability

Sustainability of SSBC will be examined at the individual client level (the number of clients who enroll and complete SSBC in the sustainability phase), individual coach level (the number of coaches that continue to deliver SSBC in the sustainability phase), and the site level (the number of sites that continue SSBC delivery in the sustainability phase; see Table 4). Potential contextual factors that influence the sustainability of SSBC will be explored through interviews with site leads and senior leadership 1 year into the sustainability phase of the project (2028) and at the end of the sustainability phase (2029). Interview guides will be developed using the ISF [44]. In addition, regional research coordinators will document any contextual factors impacting sustainability during regular meetings with site leads. All sustainability determinants will be deductively coded to the categories represented in the ISF (outer context, organizational context, processes, intervention characteristics, and implementer characteristics) by 2 independent coders. Implementation strategies used during this sustainability phase will be documented and analyzed as per the same processes used for implementation.

Recruitment and Consent

SSBC Clients

Recruitment strategies will vary across delivery sites, based on the local connections previously or newly established by the research team and delivery team. A series of generic recruitment materials (eg, posters, pamphlets, or social media posts) and potential recruitment pathways (eg, health assessment days and physician referrals) have been generated by the research team and will be shared with all delivery sites. These recruitment strategies will be included in the implementation strategies’ blueprint and toolkit. Each site will tailor their recruitment plan to the local contextual needs with support from the research team.

Interested or referred individuals will complete an eligibility survey to determine their eligibility for SSBC. Individuals are eligible for SSBC if they are 18 years of age or older, able to read and speak English, and meet one of the following criteria: (1) have been diagnosed with prediabetes by a physician, (2) have an HbA_1c of 5.7%-6.4%, (3) have an American Diabetes Association risk assessment score indicating high risk (≥5), or (4) have achieved T2D remission (have an HbA_1c of <6.5%) without any diabetes-related medications for a minimum of 3 months. Eligible individuals will be directed to an online consent form. Following completion, individuals will be scheduled for their first SSBC session at their local YMCA implementation site.

Individuals who express an interest in the substudy will be given a blood requisition form for an HbA_1c measurement from a partnering local blood requisition laboratory. The substudy will aim to oversample individuals identifying as visible minority to ensure that priority populations are represented in line with the most recent Canadian Government statistics (based and derived directly from the concept of visible minority in the census [31.3% of the Canadian population identify as being from a racialized group, with 25.2% as visible minority and 6.1% from Indigenous ancestry]). The substudy will also oversample individuals identifying as male, who are at greater risk for having prediabetes and developing T2D [6], yet are disproportionately represented in DPPs [92]. Demographic information of clients enrolling in the substudy will be assessed every 6 months to determine the proportion of individuals self-identifying as visible minorities and males. Purposive sampling may be used during the substudy if the demographic data of subsample clients demonstrates over- or underrepresentation.

SSBC Delivery Team

YMCA staff from the delivery sites will be invited to participate in this study to provide feedback on adaptation, implementation processes, and factors influencing implementation and sustainability of SSBC at their site. Site leads and coaches will be identified by senior leadership at each YMCA facility. After completing coach training, site leads and coaches will receive a consent form to participate in surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Senior leadership will receive a consent form 12 months into the program delivery, inviting them to participate in interviews and focus groups.

Project Governance

A holacratic approach to organizational operations was codeveloped with delivery sites to enhance conflict resolution and achieve project objectives. Specifically, each team member is considered integral and acknowledges their interconnected role in multiple project processes and outcomes (Figure 4). Municipality partners (made up of patient partners, SSBC alumni, and persons with lived experience) are central to advising the project. The delivery team—the community-dwelling staff who deliver SSBC and liaise directly with researchers, senior YMCA leadership, and municipality partners—will provide ongoing feedback on referral and recruitment strategies, SSBC implementation and adaptations, and factors influencing organizational and staff readiness. YMCA senior management at each site oversees the delivery team and reports to the research team. Three committees will provide feedback and guidance on methods used, analyses performed, outputs reported, and the sustainability plan based on their expertise and experiences for sex, gender, and inclusivity; program evaluation; and the diabetes prevention engagement committee. Finally, an advisory committee will act as an external committee distinct from the project team. This committee will ensure that safe and ethical principles are applied throughout the project, project milestones are met promptly, and all decisions are made with clients and delivery organizations in mind.

‎

Ethical Considerations

This study has been approved by the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board (H23-01930) and other university and provincial ethics boards (Brock University Health Science Research Ethics Board [REB-23-157] and Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Board [HREB 20250577]). All activities will comply with the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct of Research Involving Humans. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Privacy and confidentiality of participant data or identity will be maintained. Consent forms will be stored separately from deidentified data. Pseudonyms will be used in interview transcripts and any reporting of the results. Participants will be compensated for their participation. Individuals who participate in the program will receive a 1-month free membership to the facility they attend. All client participants will receive a CAD $20 gift card for each of the follow-up appointments that they attend (CAD $40 total), as well as a CAD $30 gift card for each time they get their bloodwork done if they are part of the subsample (CAD $90 total). All participants who participate in an interview or focus group will receive a CAD $30 gift card. This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies checklist [93] was used to guide the reporting of this protocol paper and can be found in Multimedia Appendix 1.

Results

Program implementation within each region is occurring in a phased approach, with partners beginning program delivery in 1 site (2024-2025) before expanding to any additional locations (2025-2027). Program enrollment occurs continuously during the implementation phase across all sites. From May 2024 to November 2025, a total of 13 delivery sites began program delivery (1 regional YMCA decided to launch in 3 sites at once), 722 participants have enrolled in the program, and 406 have begun the program (153/342, 44.7% non-Western or Eastern European, 17/342, 5% of whom report identifying as Indigenous; 80/345, 23.2% men or 82/347, 23.6% male). Further, 334 participants have expressed interest in the substudy, of which 89 have had their first blood draw (19/89, 21.8% identify as a visible minority; 4/89, 5.3% indigenous; 16/82, 19.5% men or 16/81, 19.8% male). An additional 13 sites have confirmed they will launch the program in 2026.

Discussion

Principal Findings

This study will provide evidence that SSBC can be scaled up nationwide across community settings to equitably and effectively reduce population-level risk of T2D. Nationwide uptake of DPPs has been previously hindered by the absence of evidence-informed implementation plans tailored to local contexts [38]. This project will identify which implementation strategies work best for whom, where, and how, deepening our understanding of how to translate SSBC to multiple contexts. We move beyond a one-size-fits-all strategy to apply evidence-based implementation principles that will result in equitable program implementation for diverse and priority populations across Canada. This protocol paper documents our key objectives and associated methods for other implementation scientists outside of the realm of T2D prevention to consider when planning to implement evidence-based interventions at scale.

Strengths and Limitations

Sustainable DPP scale-up is a necessary condition for improved population health outcomes. This is the first study to examine how to sustain an evidence-based DPP in real-world community contexts. Unlike other DPPs that have been delivered at a national scale (eg, US National DPP [94] and English National DPP [95]), SSBC was designed to include characteristics that are key for achieving sustainability—for example, being brief, adaptable, community-based, and delivered by laypersons with no specialized training. By exploring the underlying factors underpinning the dynamic processes of implementation and sustainability when delivered at a broad scale, and engaging early with municipality partners to develop and prioritize sustainability planning to overcome identified barriers, this research will discern best practice implementation determinants, outcomes, and strategies critical for sustaining DPP implementation across Canada and beyond.

Implementation science is critical in improving health equity by ensuring health programs are accessible and effective to those most in need [40,41]. Of the participants that have enrolled thus far, we are on track for reaching an ethnically representative sample of the Canadian population, which will allow us to understand if SSBC is effective for visible minorities; however, individuals self-identifying as men and male continue to be underrepresented in SSBC participation. Establishing buy-in from health care professionals in clinical settings may help us to reach this demographic, but developing partnerships with this sector has proven challenging. Extending diabetes prevention to community settings is key to advancing health equity; however, staff shortages and turnover are ongoing challenges faced when working with community partners.

Dissemination Plan

End-of-project and integrated knowledge translation activities are planned and designed around fundamental knowledge translation principles [96-98]. To ensure broad reach, we will share our knowledge with multiple audiences using multiple formats (see Table 5 for a selected list of knowledge mobilization activities).