Search Articles

Reported Outcomes in Published Systematic Reviews of Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment: Protocol for a Systematic Overview

of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the IPT outcomes reported in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Elena Dragioti, Huan-Ji Dong, Britt Larsson, Björn Gerdle

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(5):e17795

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Relationship Between Depression and the Use of Mobile Technologies and Social Media Among Adolescents: Umbrella Review

Despite the abundance of literature, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses, most of the existing evidence is based on cross-sectional studies or surveys.

Jorge Arias-de la Torre, Elisa Puigdomenech, Xavier García, Jose M Valderas, Francisco Jose Eiroa-Orosa, Tania Fernández-Villa, Antonio J Molina, Vicente Martín, Antoni Serrano-Blanco, Jordi Alonso, Mireia Espallargues

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e16388

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Increased Workload for Systematic Review Literature Searches of Diagnostic Tests Compared With Treatments: Challenges and Opportunities

For example, Cochrane maintains the Cochrane database of systematic reviews; an extensive database which, at the end of the year 2013 contained over 5000 reviews.

Henry Petersen, Josiah Poon, Simon K. Poon, Clement Loy

JMIR Med Inform 2014;2(1):e11

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Legacy Effect of Delayed Blood Pressure-Lowering Pharmacotherapy in Middle-Aged Individuals Stratified by Absolute Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Protocol for a Systematic Review

Therefore, in this systematic review and meta-analysis, we will investigate the effects of BP-lowering drug treatments in middle-aged individuals with mildly elevated BP, stratified by absolute CVD risk.MethodsReview ObjectivesAim 1We will conduct a systematic

Chau Le Bao Ho, Sharon Sanders, Jenny Doust, Monique Breslin, Christopher M Reid, Mark Raymond Nelson

JMIR Res Protoc 2017;6(9):e177

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Identifying Brief Message Content for Interventions Delivered via Mobile Devices to Improve Medication Adherence in People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Rapid Systematic Review

to (1) systematically search for systematic reviews of quantitative studies that focused on medication adherence in physical health conditions and systematic reviews of qualitative studies that focused on adherence in type 2 diabetes, (2) extract data on theoretical

Hannah Long, Yvonne K Bartlett, Andrew J Farmer, David P French

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(1):e10421

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Nonsurgical Strategies in Patients With NET Liver Metastases: A Protocol of Four Systematic Reviews

The aim of these four systematic reviews is to determine evidence for the noninvasive treatment options in terms of symptom relief and tumor control in patients with nonresectable liver metastases of NETs.

Perparim Limani, Christoph Tschuor, Laura Gort, Bettina Balmer, Alexander Gu, Christos Ceresa, Dimitri Aristotle Raptis, Mickael Lesurtel, Milo Puhan, Stefan Breitenstein

JMIR Res Protoc 2014;3(1):e9

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Hazards of the Cytokine Storm and Cytokine-Targeted Therapy in Patients With COVID-19: Review

The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria were applied.The screening of titles and abstracts was performed by the authors. The full texts were reviewed in a second screening.

Miguel Quirch, Jeannie Lee, Shabnam Rehman

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e20193

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Developing Embedded Taxonomy and Mining Patients’ Interests From Web-Based Physician Reviews: Mixed-Methods Approach

If the physician received only a few reviews, fact-oriented reviews induced a more favorable attitude toward the physician compared with emotional reviews; however, there was no such effect when the physician received many reviews.

Jia Li, Minghui Liu, Xiaojun Li, Xuan Liu, Jingfang Liu

J Med Internet Res 2018;20(8):e254

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Deep Neural Network for Reducing the Screening Workload in Systematic Reviews for Clinical Guidelines: Algorithm Validation Study

As a single systematic review or meta-analysis usually requires 1 to 2 years to complete, only one-third of all Cochrane reviews are updated on time [4], and many reviews are obsolete or missing [5,6].

Tomohide Yamada, Daisuke Yoneoka, Yuta Hiraike, Kimihiro Hino, Hiroyoshi Toyoshiba, Akira Shishido, Hisashi Noma, Nobuhiro Shojima, Toshimasa Yamauchi

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(12):e22422

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: Cross-Sectional Analysis

Similar lines of inquiry have noted poor reporting quality in systematic reviews [15-18].

Ryan Ottwell, Taylor C Rogers, J Michael Anderson, Austin Johnson, Matt Vassar

JMIR Dermatol 2020;3(1):e16978

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS