Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Currently accepted at: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Nov 6, 2019
Date Accepted: Dec 16, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.

It will appear shortly on 10.2196/16934

The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.

Effectiveness of conversational agents (virtual assistants) in healthcare: protocol for a systematic review

  • Caroline de Cock; 
  • Madison Milne-Ives; 
  • Michelle Helena van Velthoven; 
  • Abrar Alturkistani; 
  • Ching Lam; 
  • Edward Meinert; 

ABSTRACT

Background:

Conversational agents have evolved in recent decades to become multimodal, multifunctional platforms that have the potential to automate a diverse range of health-related activities, supporting the general public, patients and physicians. Multiple studies have reported the development of these agents and recent systematic reviews have described the scope of use of conversational agents in healthcare. However, there is little focus on the effectiveness of these systems, thus the viability and applicability of these systems is unclear.

Objective:

The objective of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of conversational agents in healthcare and to identify limitations, adverse events and areas for future investigation of these agents.

Methods:

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols will be used to structure this protocol. The focus of the systematic review is guided by a population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework . A systematic search of PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science will be conducted. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts of identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any discrepancies will then be discussed and resolved. Two reviewers will extract and validate data, respectively, from included studies into a standardised form and conduct quality appraisal.

Results:

At the time of writing, we have begun a preliminary literature search and piloting of the study selection process.

Conclusions:

This systematic review aims to clarify the effectiveness, limitations and future applications of conversational agents in healthcare. Our findings may be used to inform future development of conversational agents and further the personalisation of care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

de Cock C, Milne-Ives M, van Velthoven MH, Alturkistani A, Lam C, Meinert E

Effectiveness of conversational agents (virtual assistants) in healthcare: protocol for a systematic review

DOI: 10.2196/16934

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/16934


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.