TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ibarra, Jose Luis
AU  - Agas, Jessica Marie
AU  - Lee, Melissa
AU  - Pan, Julia Lily
AU  - Buttenheim, Alison Meredith
PY  - 2018
DA  - 2018/04/16
TI  - Comparison of Online Survey Recruitment Platforms for Hard-to-Reach Pregnant Smoking Populations: Feasibility Study
JO  - JMIR Res Protoc
SP  - e101
VL  - 7
IS  - 4
KW  - socioeconomic status
KW  - smoking
KW  - nicotine
KW  - cognitive bias
KW  - Web-based methods
KW  - crowdsourcing
KW  - delay discounting
KW  - vulnerable populations
AB  - Background: Recruiting hard-to-reach populations for health research is challenging. Web-based platforms offer one way to recruit specific samples for research purposes, but little is known about the feasibility of online recruitment and the representativeness and comparability of samples recruited through different Web-based platforms. Objective: The objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of recruiting a hard-to-reach population (pregnant smokers) using 4 different Web-based platforms and to compare participants recruited through each platform. Methods: A screener and survey were distributed online through Qualtrics Panel, Soapbox Sample, Reddit, and Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results of each recruitment platform, including eligibility yield, quality yield, income, race, age, and gestational age. Results: Of the 3847 participants screened for eligibility across all 4 Web-based platforms, 535 were eligible and 308 completed the survey. Amazon mTurk yielded the fewest completed responses (n=9), 100% (9/9) of which passed several quality metrics verifying pregnancy and smoking status. Qualtrics Panel yielded 14 completed responses, 86% (12/14) of which passed the quality screening. Soapbox Sample produced 107 completed surveys, 67% (72/107) of which were found to be quality responses. Advertising through Reddit produced the highest completion rate (n=178), but only 29.2% (52/178) of those surveys passed the quality metrics. We found significant differences in eligibility yield, quality yield, age, number of previous pregnancies, age of smoking initiation, current smokers, race, education, and income (P<.001). Conclusions: Although each platform successfully recruited pregnant smokers, results varied in quality, cost, and percentage of complete responses. Moving forward, investigators should pay careful attention to the percentage yield and cost of online recruitment platforms to maximize internal and external validity. 
SN  - 1929-0748
UR  - http://www.researchprotocols.org/2018/4/e101/
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8071
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29661751
DO  - 10.2196/resprot.8071
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/resprot.8071
ER  -