This is a community-based interventional implementation study with a mixed methods evaluation design. The intervention being implemented is a CyTB skin test–based LTBI screening model supported by the TBConnect Android app. The model includes identification of eligible HHCs, digital registration, CyTB administration, follow-up for 48-to-72-hour induration reading, app-assisted induration documentation, result recording, and referral of participants with positive screening results for further evaluation.

The study will compare 3 implementation pathways for delivering the same CyTB-TBConnect screening model: health facility–based, home-based, and camp-based screening. These pathways will be compared as alternative service-delivery approaches, not as distinct diagnostic interventions.

The evaluation will include quantitative and qualitative components. Quantitative data will assess screening coverage, completion of follow-up reading, LTBI positivity, agreement between app-assisted and manual induration readings, data completeness, operational efficiency, and documentation of referral advice for CyTB-positive participants. Qualitative data will explore acceptability, usability, barriers, facilitators, and contextual factors affecting implementation from the perspectives of HHCs and health care workers. A logic model will guide the development and optimization phase, and the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework will guide the implementation evaluation [27,28].

Implementation success will be assessed using predefined screening, operational, digital, and referral-related indicators. The model will be considered feasible if eligible HHCs can be identified and enrolled through routine program systems, if a high proportion of enrolled participants complete CyTB administration and 48-to-72-hour induration reading, and if health care workers can use the TBConnect app for registration, documentation, induration capture, and reporting after training.

The main indicators of implementation success will include screening coverage among eligible HHCs, completion of follow-up reading within the required 48-to-72-hour window, LTBI positivity among screened participants, agreement between app-assisted and manual induration readings, completeness of digital records, time required for test administration and reading, documentation of referral advice among CyTB-positive participants, participant acceptability, health care worker acceptability, and feasibility of delivery through the 3 screening pathways.

The study will be conducted in the Balesar block, Jodhpur district, Rajasthan, India, over 24 months. The intervention will be implemented by health care staff of community health centers (CHCs), primary health centers (PHCs), and subhealth centers/Ayushman Arogya Mandir. The block comprises a CHC, 5 PHCs, and 52 subcenters.

The study will include HHCs of patients with confirmed tuberculosis who have had close, prolonged exposure to the index case, are aged 1 year or older, and reside within the study area. An HHC will be defined as an individual residing in the same household as the index patient with tuberculosis or sharing the same enclosed living space during the index case’s infectious period. Confirmed tuberculosis index cases will be identified through routine NTEP records and the Nikshay portal maintained at public health facilities in the study block. Frontline health workers, such as community health officers and auxiliary nurse midwives, will participate in screening, data entry, and follow-up activities to support implementation and evaluation.

Eligible participants will include HHCs of patients with confirmed tuberculosis residing in the selected study block who are aged 1 year or older and who provide informed consent or assent, as applicable. Individuals who do not provide informed consent, are unavailable for follow-up reading within the 48-to-72-hour window, or have conditions that preclude safe administration or assessment of the skin test will be excluded. They will be documented in accordance with the study workflow and excluded from completed-screening estimates. Health care workers involved in implementation in the study area will be eligible for participation in the training and evaluation components.

All eligible HHCs or family members of confirmed tuberculosis patients identified within the selected block during the study period will be invited to participate. The implementation will be conducted in 1 block of Jodhpur district, Rajasthan. The projected screening population was estimated using the approximate block population, expected prevalence of active tuberculosis, and average household size.

The selected block has an approximate population of 300,000. Based on an estimated active tuberculosis prevalence of 0.2% [29], the expected number of confirmed tuberculosis patients in the block is approximately 600. Considering an average household size of 4 members, the estimated number of HHCs or family members eligible for screening is approximately 2400. Therefore, the anticipated screening population for this implementation study is 2400 participants. This protocol aims to inform stakeholders about the study design, procedures, and evaluation methods to facilitate successful implementation.

Although the study is not designed as an individually randomized efficacy trial, the projected sample size is considered adequate for the primary implementation objectives. A sample of 2400 participants will allow estimation of LTBI positivity in the screened population with acceptable precision. The projected screening population represents the expected number of eligible HHCs who may be approached during the study period; actual enrollment and screening completion will depend on participant availability, eligibility, consent, and completion of the 48-to-72-hour reading visit.

To validate app-assisted induration measurement, the required sample size was estimated for an agreement analysis using the intraclass correlation coefficient approach described by Walter et al [30]. Assuming a minimum acceptable intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85, an expected intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95, a 2-sided significance level of 0.05, 90% power, 2 ratings per participant, and a 10% allowance for noncompletion of paired readings, the required validation sample size was 37 participants. However, this appeared to be a small sample size. Accordingly, in the current protocol, approximately 50% of participants completing the 48-to-72-hour reading will have paired app-assisted and manual scale-based induration measurements recorded in TBConnect. This proportion is expected to provide a validation subset substantially larger than the minimum required sample size.

Eligible HHCs will be identified from health facility records documenting patients with confirmed tuberculosis and their household members. Participants meeting the eligibility criteria will be enrolled and registered in the TBConnect app. Trained health care workers will administer CyTB and perform follow-up reading in accordance with standard operating procedures.

Before LTBI testing, participants will be screened for symptoms suggestive of active tuberculosis in accordance with NTEP guidelines, and those with presumptive tuberculosis will be referred for diagnostic evaluation. Following registration, the smart patch will be placed on the participant’s arm, the QR code scanned, the injection site prepared, and the CyTB test administered intradermally using the Mantoux technique. After 48 to 72 hours, app-assisted reading will be performed by scanning the code and capturing the induration image. A predefined subset of participants will additionally undergo manual measurement by trained personnel. For the validation subset, both app-assisted and manual scale-based induration measurements will be obtained during the same 48-to-72-hour reading visit. Manual measurements will be performed by trained personnel using the standard palpation-and-ruler method. To reduce bias, a separate, blinded, trained reader who is unaware of the app-assisted result will independently record the manual measurement. After completing the manual reading, the reader will enter the value into the app. Both measurements will be reflected in TBConnect as continuous values in millimeters and classified as positive or negative using the predefined ≥5 mm threshold.

Participants with positive CyTB screening results will be counseled and advised to attend the nearest designated public health facility for further evaluation and management in accordance with NTEP guidelines. The study will document the positive screening result and referral advice provided. Referral completion, initiation of tuberculosis preventive therapy, adherence, and treatment outcomes will not be assessed as study outcomes. Participants with symptoms suggestive of active tuberculosis at baseline screening will be referred for diagnostic evaluation under routine program procedures. They will not be classified as LTBI-positive based on CyTB screening. The referral advice documented for CyTB-positive participants applies only to individuals with positive LTBI screening results.

Three screening pathways will be evaluated: health facility–based, home-based, and camp-based. In the health facility–based pathway, eligible HHCs will be invited to a participating public health facility for registration, CyTB administration, and follow-up reading. In the home-based pathway, trained health care workers will conduct screening activities at or near the participant’s residence. In the camp-based pathway, screening will be organized through community-level sessions at predefined locations.

Participants will not be randomly assigned to the health facility–based, home-based, or camp-based screening pathways. HHCs will be mapped from the list of confirmed active tuberculosis patients obtained from the District Tuberculosis Office, Nikshay portal, and records maintained at participating CHCs, PHCs, and subhealth centers. These records will be used to identify index tuberculosis patients enrolled for treatment and to compile a list of eligible HHCs, including family members and close contacts residing within the same household.

The 3 screening pathways will be implemented within the same operational period during the pilot phase to assess their feasibility under comparable field conditions. Program logistics, location of the index tuberculosis patient, availability of HHCs, field team planning, and local service delivery arrangements will determine pathway allocation. In the health facility–based pathway, HHCs will be invited to the nearest participating health facility for CyTB administration and 48-to-72-hour reading. In the home-based pathway, the field team will visit households directly and assess feasibility based on HHC availability, coverage, CyTB administration, and completion of the second scan. In the camp-based pathway, HHCs will be mobilized to attend predefined community screening sessions.

All HHCs will be informed in advance by telephone or through local health workers about the date and location of the first scan and will be contacted again for the 48-to-72-hour reading. The same CyTB-TBConnect workflow, eligibility criteria, consent procedures, reading window, positivity threshold, and referral advice procedure will be followed across all 3 pathways.

Because pathway allocation is not randomized, comparisons across the 3 pathways will be descriptive and implementation-focused. The findings may be affected by selection bias, differences in participant availability, distance from health facilities, household accessibility, and local program logistics. Therefore, the pathway with the highest HHC coverage and completion of first and second scans will be interpreted as the most feasible approach for further implementation within the study area, rather than as evidence of superior clinical effectiveness.

All 3 pathways will use the same eligibility criteria, consent procedures, CyTB administration method, 48-to-72-hour reading window, positivity threshold, TBConnect documentation process, and referral criteria. Therefore, the pathways will be compared as alternative implementation approaches for delivering the same screening intervention, rather than as different diagnostic interventions.

The 3 pathways are included because HHC screening may require different delivery strategies under routine program conditions. Facility-based screening may allow for closer supervision and easier documentation; home-based screening may reduce access barriers for HHCs; and camp-based screening may improve reach within defined community clusters. The purpose of comparing these pathways is to assess their relative feasibility of implementation, not to determine diagnostic superiority.

The comparison will consider both coverage and operational requirements. Indicators will include the proportion of identified HHCs reached, proportion enrolled, proportion receiving CyTB, proportion completing the 48-to-72-hour reading, LTBI positivity, completeness of TBConnect records, time required for test administration and reading, documentation of referral advice among participants with positive screening results, participant acceptability, health care worker acceptability, staffing requirements, logistical feasibility, and pathway-specific operational challenges.

The pathway with the most favorable implementation performance will not be assumed to be automatically acceptable for wider program use. Its suitability for further implementation will be interpreted in relation to operational feasibility, resource requirements, health system capacity, and local program priorities.

The study will be implemented in 4 phases. The preparatory phase will include recruitment and training of project staff, procurement of equipment and consumables, stakeholder engagement, pilot-testing of procedures, identification of eligible participants from health records, and deployment of the Android app. The codevelopment and optimization phase will include training block-level staff, piloting the CyTB-TBConnect model, testing the 3 screening pathways, collecting user feedback, and iteratively refining study procedures and the app interface. A logic model will be used in this phase to track inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and expected impact (Table 1). During the implementation phase, the optimized model will be deployed across the study block for large-scale screening of HHCs of patients with confirmed tuberculosis, as illustrated in Figure 2. Any modifications to procedures or app features during the optimization phase will be documented systematically. During the evaluation phase, the intervention will be assessed using the RE-AIM framework across the domains of reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance, as explained in Table 2.

To improve transparency and reproducibility, participant flow will be documented from the identification of confirmed tuberculosis index cases, listing of eligible HHCs, eligibility assessment, consent or assent, CyTB administration, completion of the 48-to-72-hour reading, validation subset inclusion where applicable, result classification, and documentation of referral advice.

Intervention delivery will be reported separately for health facility–based, home-based, and camp-based pathways. Outcome measures will be grouped into screening, implementation, validation, and acceptability domains. Feasibility will be assessed using HHC coverage, CyTB administration, completion of the second reading, data completeness, time requirements, staffing needs, logistical feasibility, and pathway-specific operational challenges. Acceptability will be assessed through qualitative interviews with HHCs and health care workers.

Implementation strategies will include stakeholder engagement, training and capacity building, pilot-testing of screening pathways, iterative model optimization, and community-focused information, education, and communication activities. Social and behavior change communication approaches will be used to address misconceptions, improve community awareness, and support participation in screening and follow-up.

The evaluation will assess screening, implementation, digital workflow, validation, and referral-documentation outcomes associated with the CyTB-TBConnect screening model. Implementation success will be assessed using predefined indicators, including screening coverage among eligible HHCs, completion of CyTB administration, completion of 48-to-72-hour induration reading, LTBI positivity, agreement between app-assisted and manual induration measurements, completeness of TBConnect records, operational feasibility across the 3 pathways, documentation of referral advice among participants with positive results, participant acceptability, and health care worker acceptability described in Table 2.

Primary outcomes include screening coverage among eligible HHCs, defined as the proportion of identified contacts who complete CyTB screening; LTBI positivity among screened participants; and agreement between app-assisted and manual induration measurements in the validation subset. Feasibility of each pathway will be assessed using predefined indicators, including screening uptake, completion of the 48-to-72-hour reading, data completeness, time required for screening and reading, documentation of referral advice, participant acceptability, and health care worker acceptability.

Secondary outcomes will focus on implementation performance and user experience. These will include health care worker proficiency following training, adoption and usability of the TBConnect app among health workers, completeness and accuracy of digital data capture within the app, operational efficiency measured by the time required for test administration and follow-up reading, participant acceptability of the screening process, and documentation of referral advice among participants with positive CyTB screening results. Referral completion, initiation of preventive therapy, adherence, and treatment outcomes will not be assessed as study outcomes.

All outcome indicators will be mapped to the domains of the RE-AIM framework, including reach, screening coverage and participant characteristics; effectiveness, LTBI positivity and agreement between reading methods; adoption, health worker participation and app use; implementation, data completeness, operational efficiency, and workflow fidelity; and maintenance, documentation of referral advice and potential integration into routine program activities.

Data analysis will be conducted using a combination of descriptive, inferential, and qualitative analytical approaches to evaluate screening outcomes and implementation processes. Quantitative data collected through the TBConnect app will be exported and compiled for analysis. Data cleaning, verification, and preliminary organization will be performed in Microsoft Excel, and records will be checked for completeness, consistency, and missing values before statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize participant characteristics and screening indicators. Variables such as age, sex, exposure characteristics, screening pathway, and CyTB test results will be summarized using frequencies, proportions, means, and SDs where appropriate. Pathway-level analyses will focus on implementation performance rather than diagnostic superiority or causal effectiveness. Descriptive comparisons will be conducted for screening coverage, completion of CyTB administration, completion of 48-to-72-hour reading, LTBI positivity, completeness of digital records, time required for test administration and reading, documentation of referral advice, participant acceptability, health care worker acceptability, and operational challenges. Where data permit, pathway comparisons will be stratified or adjusted for relevant participant and contextual characteristics, including age, sex, relationship to the index tuberculosis patient, exposure history, distance from the health facility, and health facility catchment area. Findings will be interpreted in the context of each pathway’s operational context. Key screening outcomes, including the proportion of eligible HHCs screened and LTBI positivity among screened participants, will be calculated. Screening coverage will be determined as the proportion of identified HHCs who complete CyTB testing and follow-up reading. These statistical analyses will be conducted using SPSS software.

Agreement between app-assisted and manual induration measurements will be assessed in the validation subset using both continuous and categorical approaches. For continuous induration values recorded in millimeters, agreement will be assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient, mean difference between methods, and Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement. For categorical classification using the predefined ≥5 mm threshold, percentage agreement and Cohen κ will be calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of app-assisted classification may also be estimated using manual classification as the reference standard. Associations between LTBI positivity and selected participant characteristics will be examined using chi-square tests for categorical variables. Variables identified as relevant will be included in multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors independently associated with LTBI positivity. Implementation and operational indicators such as health care worker proficiency, screening completion rates, follow-up reading rates, data completeness, and operational efficiency will also be analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Qualitative interview data will be analyzed using thematic analysis. Transcripts will be imported into NVivo, coded inductively, and grouped into categories and higher-order themes reflecting barriers and facilitators to implementation. Initial open coding will be conducted to identify meaningful segments of text related to participants’ experiences, the usability of the TBConnect app, the acceptability of CyTB screening, and operational challenges. Codes will then be grouped into categories and organized into broader themes reflecting barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Health care workers will undergo structured training followed by assessment and certification before field deployment to support implementation fidelity and data quality. Pilot-testing will be undertaken to assess feasibility and refine workflow, screening procedures, and app use. During implementation, digital records and operational logs will be reviewed regularly to monitor completeness, consistency, and operational challenges. The logic model will guide optimization during the pilot phase, and the RE-AIM framework will guide the final evaluation.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of ICMR-NIIRNCD (Indian Council of Medical Research–National Institute for Implementation Research on Non-Communicable Diseases), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India (CD/TB/INTR-IM-2024-00135 on August 7, 2025). Written informed consent will be obtained from all adult participants. For participants younger than 18 years, written parental or guardian consent and age-appropriate assent will be obtained, as applicable.

Participant confidentiality will be maintained by assigning unique study identification numbers and storing all data collected via the TBConnect app on secure, password-protected systems with role-based access controls. Only authorized members of the research team will have access to identifiable information, and study findings will be reported in aggregate form. No monetary compensation will be provided to participants for participation in this study.

This study is expected to provide implementation evidence on the use of a digitally supported CyTB-based LTBI screening model for HHCs of confirmed tuberculosis patients within routine primary health care services. Its main contribution will be to examine whether CyTB testing can be integrated with the TBConnect app to support key program processes, including participant registration, screening workflow documentation, induration recording, follow-up reading within 48-72 hours, and reporting. In addition to estimating LTBI positivity, the study will assess HHC coverage, completion of induration reading, data completeness, operational feasibility, and acceptability among participants and health care workers.

The comparison of health facility–based, home-based, and camp-based screening pathways aims to identify the most feasible approach to reaching and screening HHCs under routine program conditions. These pathways will be assessed as alternative delivery strategies for the same CyTB-TBConnect screening model, rather than as separate diagnostic interventions. The pathway showing the most favorable combination of HHC coverage, participant attendance, completion of 48-to-72-hour reading, data completeness, and acceptability may guide subsequent implementation within the study area.

The study will also assess agreement between app-assisted and manual induration measurements using paired observations recorded in TBConnect. This component is expected to provide field-level evidence on whether app-supported induration documentation can be used reliably within routine screening workflows.

HHCs of individuals with tuberculosis are an important group for LTBI screening because of their close exposure to infectious disease and increased risk of progression to active tuberculosis. This aligns with the prevention-oriented priorities of the NTEP, which emphasizes early identification and management of individuals at risk of tuberculosis [15]. Although LTBI testing is recognized as an important component of tuberculosis prevention, its implementation within routine public health services remains constrained by operational barriers, including participant mobilization, return visits for skin test reading, documentation requirements, and program-level monitoring [16].

CyTB offers a practical, skin-test–based approach that can be delivered in primary health care and community settings. When combined with a digital workflow, it may support more standardized documentation, follow-up tracking, induration recording, and reporting. However, evidence on the combined implementation of CyTB testing and an Android-supported workflow under routine program conditions in India remains limited. By evaluating this model through 3 service delivery pathways, the study is positioned to generate program-relevant evidence on implementation feasibility rather than focusing only on diagnostic performance [20].

A key strength of this study is its implementation within routine public health services using existing primary health care structures and frontline health care workers. This increases the relevance of the findings for program planning and future implementation. The use of a logic model during development and optimization, followed by RE-AIM–guided evaluation, provides a structured approach for assessing implementation outcomes. The mixed methods design will allow quantitative indicators of screening performance to be interpreted alongside qualitative findings on user experience, acceptability, and operational challenges. The validation of app-assisted induration measurement against manual measurement further strengthens the assessment of the digital workflow.

The study is being conducted in a single implementation setting, and findings may not be directly generalizable to other districts or health system contexts without further evaluation. The projected sample is based on the estimated number of eligible HHCs in the selected block. Still, the actual screening coverage will depend on consent rates, participant availability, and completion of the 48-to-72-hour reading. The study evaluates the implementation of screening and the documentation of referral advice; it does not assess the postreferral cascade, including clinical evaluation, initiation of tuberculosis preventive therapy, adherence, or treatment outcomes. Therefore, the study conclusions will be limited to the implementation and performance of the block-level CyTB-TBConnect screening model for LTBI.

The findings may help refine CyTB-based LTBI screening within routine primary health care services. Identification of a feasible and implementable delivery pathway may improve HHC coverage in the study area and guide further evaluation in other program settings. Evidence from the TBConnect workflow may also inform digital documentation, follow-up tracking, and induration recording for LTBI screening. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings, and communication with stakeholders in district and state tuberculosis programs.

This protocol describes the implementation and evaluation of a digitally supported CyTB-based LTBI screening model for HHCs of confirmed tuberculosis patients in Rajasthan, India. By assessing screening coverage, completion of 48-to-72-hour induration readings, pathway feasibility, agreement between app-assisted and manual induration readings, digital data completeness, and user acceptability, the study will generate operational evidence relevant to LTBI screening within routine primary health care services. The findings may help refine HHC screening approaches and guide further evaluation of CyTB-TBConnect-supported screening models in other program settings.