<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.0 20040830//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="2.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">JMIR Res Protoc</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ResProt</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="index">5</journal-id><journal-title>JMIR Research Protocols</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>JMIR Res Protoc</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">1929-0748</issn><publisher><publisher-name>JMIR Publications</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Toronto, Canada</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">v15i1e82712</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/82712</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Protocol</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Tunnel Anastomosis vs Double-Tract Jejunal Interposition Reconstruction After Proximal Gastrectomy: Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>Qingyu</given-names></name><degrees>MSc</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>Rui</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yue</surname><given-names>Chao</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name><degrees>MSc</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Lingli</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Xiaoxiao</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Haitian</given-names></name><degrees>MSc</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Liang</given-names></name><degrees>MSc</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gu</surname><given-names>Rongmin</given-names></name><degrees>BSc</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Huanqiu</given-names></name><degrees>BSc</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ming</surname><given-names>Xuezhi</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Weiguo</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Guangli</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>Hao</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Zhe</given-names></name><degrees>BSc</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Longhao</given-names></name><degrees>BSc</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Xiaohua</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Xiaoyu</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Jin</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Meng</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Hao</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Gang</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University &#x0026; Jiangsu Cancer Hospital &#x0026; Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research</institution><addr-line>No. 42, Baiziting</addr-line><addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line><country>China</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><institution>The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine</institution><addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line><country>China</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><institution>Jiangsu University Affiliated Gaochun Hospital</institution><addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line><country>China</country></aff><aff id="aff4"><institution>The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University</institution><addr-line>Suzhou</addr-line><country>China</country></aff><aff id="aff5"><institution>Nanjing University Medical School Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital</institution><addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line><country>China</country></aff><aff id="aff6"><institution>The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University</institution><addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line><country>China</country></aff><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sarvestan</surname><given-names>Javad</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Fei</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Jun</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp>Correspondence to Gang Li, PhD, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University &#x0026; Jiangsu Cancer Hospital &#x0026; Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, No. 42, Baiziting, Nanjing, 210009, China, 86 13776689750; <email>ligang@njmu.edu.cn</email></corresp><fn fn-type="equal" id="equal-contrib1"><label>*</label><p>these authors contributed equally</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>3</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><elocation-id>e82712</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>08</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>05</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></date></history><copyright-statement>&#x00A9; Qingyu Xie, Rui Peng, Chao Yue, Wei Wei, Lingli Huang, Xiaoxiao Wang, Haitian Wang, Liang Chen, Rongmin Gu, Huanqiu Chen, Xuezhi Ming, Xu Wen, Weiguo Xu, Guangli Sun, Hao Fan, Zhe Wang, Longhao Yang, Xiaohua Zhou, Xiaoyu Wu, Jin Zhou, Meng Wang, Hao Xu, Gang Li. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.researchprotocols.org">https://www.researchprotocols.org</ext-link>), 27.3.2026. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.researchprotocols.org">https://www.researchprotocols.org</ext-link>, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.</p></license><self-uri xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://www.researchprotocols.org/2026/1/e82712"/><abstract><sec><title>Background</title><p>Tunnel anastomosis is a novel anastomotic technique for digestive tract reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy. A previous retrospective study by our team demonstrated its favorable antireflux effect; therefore, we hypothesize that tunnel anastomosis is noninferior to double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction in preventing postoperative reflux esophagitis, and we will conduct this prospective study to further validate this assumption.</p></sec><sec><title>Objective</title><p>In this study, we will prospectively compare tunnel anastomosis with the currently more prevalent double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction technique to further validate its safety and efficacy.</p></sec><sec sec-type="methods"><title>Methods</title><p>This is a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study that will enroll 240 patients who will undergo proximal gastrectomy. The study will be divided into 2 groups: the tunnel anastomosis group and the double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction group, with 120 patients in each group. Patients will undergo clinical assessments and complete questionnaires preoperatively, as well as at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months postoperatively. The primary end point is the incidence of reflux esophagitis within 1 year. The secondary end points include perioperative safety, postoperative quality of life, and postoperative nutritional status.</p></sec><sec sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><p>Recruitment of patients commenced in March 2022 and is scheduled to conclude in February 2027. The follow-up for all enrolled patients will be completed by February 2028.</p></sec><sec sec-type="conclusions"><title>Conclusions</title><p>To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study on this technique, aiming to provide novel insights into the methods of digestive reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy.</p></sec><sec><title>Trial Registration</title><p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200057397; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=154418</p></sec><sec sec-type="registered-report"><title>International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)</title><p>DERR1-10.2196/82712</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>gastric cancer</kwd><kwd>proximal gastrectomy</kwd><kwd>tunnel anastomosis</kwd><kwd>double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction</kwd><kwd>antireflux</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Gastric cancer is a type of cancer with high morbidity and mortality in China, and the incidence of proximal gastric cancer is currently increasing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>]. Surgical treatment for proximal gastric cancer involves either total gastrectomy or proximal gastrectomy. Research has shown that proximal gastrectomy has the same therapeutic potential and efficacy as total gastrectomy, with advantages in terms of postoperative weight loss, dumping syndrome, anemia, and nutritional supplementation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>]. However, the issue of reflux esophagitis following proximal gastrectomy remains a significant challenge for surgeons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>]. Numerous studies have been conducted on antireflux techniques for digestive reconstruction, including double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction and the double-flap technique (Kamikawa anastomosis), which have exhibited promising antireflux effects. Nevertheless, there is still no consensus on which reconstruction method should be considered the standard [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>Tunnel anastomosis is a novel technique for digestive tract reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy. Owing to its preservation of an intact muscular flap, it ensures superior blood supply to the anastomotic site. A previous study by our team demonstrated that the antireflux effects of this technique are favorable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>]. Double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction is currently the mainstream method for digestive tract reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy and is widely recognized by most experts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>]. The incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis following this procedure is approximately 10%. Therefore, we selected this technique as the control group to further validate the effectiveness of TA.</p><p>We hypothesize that tunnel anastomosis is noninferior to double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction in preventing postoperative reflux esophagitis. The objective of this study is to further validate the surgical safety and antireflux effect of tunnel anastomosis and assess the efficacy and ability of this technique to improve the quality of life of patients following proximal gastrectomy. It is hoped that this research will contribute to enhancing the theoretical and clinical practice foundations for refining surgical treatment strategies for upper gastric cancer.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="methods"><title>Methods</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Ethical Considerations</title><p>This study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (2021-091-01). All patients will be fully informed of the precautions by a professional physician and provided with a written informed consent form before participation. All research information will be kept strictly at the study site and these data will be anonymized. This information will not be published outside the research without the consent of the patients.</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Study Design and Participants</title><p>This multicenter prospective study will be conducted at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, and Affiliated Gaochun Hospital of Jiangsu University. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure1">Figure 1</xref> illustrates the flow of the study.</p><p>The inclusion criteria for this study are as follows: (1) age range of 18 to 80 years, with no sex preference; (2) histopathological confirmation of adenocarcinoma via endoscopic biopsy; (3) tumor located in the upper third of the stomach without esophageal involvement, largest diameter of &#x2264;4 cm, and preoperative clinical stage cT1-4aN0M0; (4) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0 to 1; (5) no surgical contraindications identified through comprehensive preoperative evaluations; and (6) voluntary and informed consent signed by the patient or their legal representative. The exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) pregnant or lactating women; (2) presence of severe psychiatric disorders; (3) intraoperative findings indicating tumor invasion into the esophagus or unsuitability for proximal gastrectomy as determined by the primary surgeon; (4) preoperative or intraoperative discovery of distant organ metastasis or extensive peritoneal implantation metastasis; (5) presence of concurrent or metachronous malignancies, including other organ tumors; (6) incomplete radical surgery, including patients who underwent palliative tumor resection; (7) a history of gastrointestinal surgery; (8) a history of neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy; (9) serious concomitant diseases that may make the survival period &#x003C;5 years; and (10) cases considered unsuitable by the investigator.</p><fig position="float" id="figure1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p>Flow diagram for the study.</p></caption><graphic alt-version="no" mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="resprot_v15i1e82712_fig01.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Postrecruitment Withdrawals and Exclusions</title><p>Patients can withdraw from this study at any time. For patients who withdraw, the information collected before withdrawal will be used for the final analysis unless they request that their information be deleted.</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Preoperative Clinical Staging</title><p>Before surgery, all patients will be required to undergo an endoscopic examination with biopsy, endoscopic ultrasonography, a plain scan and a contrast-enhanced scan of the whole abdomen, and an upper gastrointestinal series. This comprehensive assessment aims to evaluate the gastric cancer lesion and abdominal lymph nodes thoroughly, with the objective of obtaining an accurate preoperative clinical diagnosis and tumor staging.</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Randomization</title><p>Patients can only be randomized into different groups once they have signed the informed consent form, completed baseline assessments, and been confirmed as fully meeting the inclusion criteria. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to 1 of the following 2 groups at a 1:1 ratio: the tunnel anastomosis group or the double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction group. The randomization process will use a stratified block randomization method, with disease stage (categorized as early stage or advanced stage) serving as the stratification factor. Patient group assignment will be determined based on random numbers generated by the R software program (version 4.0.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing).</p></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>Surgical Procedure</title><sec id="s2-6-1"><title>Overview</title><p>Both groups will undergo proximal gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection (open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted). cT1N0 patients will undergo D1+ lymph node dissection (1, 2, 3a, 4sa, 4sb, 7, 8a, 9, and 11p), whereas the remaining patients will undergo D2 lymph node dissection (D1+ and 11d). The surgeon will be required to hold the qualification of a chief physician and strictly adhere to the protocol procedures for reconstruction. All surgical procedures will be video or photo recorded.</p></sec><sec id="s2-6-2"><title>Tunnel Anastomosis Technique</title><p>First, a linear cutting stapler will be used to transect the esophagus and create a gastric tube. Second, a 3-cm transverse incision will be made in the anterior wall of the remnant stomach, approximately 3 to 4 cm from the upper edge between the greater and lesser curvatures, reaching but not incising the muscular layer. Third, another parallel incision of equal length 3.5 cm distal to the first incision will be made. Fourth, between these 2 incisions, the connective tissue between the submucosa and muscular layers will be dissected via an electrosurgical knife, creating a tunnel flap of approximately 3 &#x00D7; 3.5 cm. Fifth, the posterior wall of the esophagus, located 5 cm from the residual stump, will be sutured with 4 stitches to the gastric wall at the upper edge of the seromuscular flap. Sixth, the esophageal stump will be pulled through the tunnel, and the anterior wall of the esophagus will be sutured with 4 to 5 stitches to the upper edge of the gastric seromuscular flap. Seventh, the submucosa and mucosal layers of the stomach will be incised at the lower incision of the tunnel to prepare for anastomosis with a caliber of 3 cm. Eighth, the esophageal stump will be opened using an ultrasonic knife, and the posterior wall of the esophagus will be sutured to the gastric mucosa and submucosa. Ninth, the anterior wall of the esophagus will be sutured to the full layer of the stomach. Finally, the lower edge of the seromuscular flap and the seromuscular layer of the remnant stomach will be sutured (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure2">Figure 2</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>].</p><fig position="float" id="figure2"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><p>Surgical steps for tunnel anastomosis.</p></caption><graphic alt-version="no" mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="resprot_v15i1e82712_fig02.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-6-3"><title>Double-Tract Jejunal Interposition Reconstruction Technique</title><p>First, mesenteric vessels will be ligated 15 to 20 cm from the Treitz ligament. Second, the distal jejunum will be pulled anterior to the transverse colon and anastomosed with the esophagus. Third, approximately 10 to 15 cm below the esophagojejunal anastomosis, the distal jejunum will be anastomosed with the anterior wall of the remnant stomach. A 6-cm linear stapler will be used to create an anastomosis with a size of 4 cm. Subsequently, at 30 to 35 cm from the gastrojejunal anastomosis, a second anastomosis will be performed between the proximal and distal jejunum.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2-7"><title>Follow-Up</title><p>Follow-up will be conducted by dedicated follow-up staff. All patients will undergo follow-up visits at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. At these visits, hematological examinations and postoperative quality of life assessments (using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 [EORTC QLQ-C30] and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey) will be performed. Nutritional status will be assessed based on hematological test results, changes in body weight, and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI). In addition, reflux symptoms will be assessed via the Visick score. At the 1-year follow-up, gastroscopy will be performed to assess reflux esophagitis according to the Los Angeles (LA) classification.</p></sec><sec id="s2-8"><title>Assessment of Outcomes</title><sec id="s2-8-1"><title>Primary End Points</title><p>The primary end point is the incidence of reflux esophagitis, which will be determined via gastroscopy results 1 year postoperatively. To determine the severity of reflux esophagitis, the modified LA classification system for reflux esophagitis will be used, which is considered a reliable method for categorizing reflux esophagitis. The modified LA classification criteria are as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>]:</p><list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Grade N&#x2014;normal mucosa</p></list-item><list-item><p>Grade M&#x2014;minimal changes to the mucosa, such as erythema and/or whitish turbidity</p></list-item><list-item><p>Grade A&#x2014;nonconfluent mucosal breaks of &#x003C;5 mm in length</p></list-item><list-item><p>Grade B&#x2014;nonconfluent mucosal breaks of &#x003E;5 mm in length</p></list-item><list-item><p>Grade C&#x2014;confluent mucosal breaks &#x003C;75% circumferential</p></list-item><list-item><p>Grade D&#x2014;confluent mucosal breaks &#x003E;75% circumferential</p></list-item></list></sec><sec id="s2-8-2"><title>Secondary End Points</title><p>The secondary study end points include perioperative safety, postoperative nutritional status, and postoperative quality of life.</p><p>Perioperative safety primarily encompasses the duration of surgery, amount of intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complication status. Nutritional status and quality of life following surgery will be assessed at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th postoperative months. Postoperative nutritional status will be determined based on changes in patient weight, hemoglobin levels, total protein levels, albumin levels, total lymphocyte count, and PNI. Additionally, patients&#x2019; quality of life will be evaluated via the EORTC QLQ-C30 and daily food intake frequency. The Visick score will be used for assessing patients&#x2019; symptoms and quality of life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>]:</p><list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Grade I&#x2014;patients are asymptomatic or have only mild symptoms that do not significantly affect their quality of life. Surgical outcomes are considered excellent.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Grade II&#x2014;patients experience mild symptoms that have minimal impact on their daily activities. Overall, patients are satisfied with the surgical outcome.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Grade III&#x2014;patients have moderate to severe symptoms that affect their daily lives. These symptoms may require medical treatment or lifestyle modifications. The surgical outcome is considered less favorable.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Grade IV&#x2014;patients have severe symptoms that significantly impact their quality of life. The surgical procedure has failed to achieve the desired outcome. Further surgical intervention or other treatments may be necessary.</p></list-item></list></sec></sec><sec id="s2-9"><title>Power and Sample Size</title><p>This study is designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial with a noninferiority objective. It comprises 2 groups: the experimental group (tunnel anastomosis group) and the control group (double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction group).</p><p>The reported incidence of reflux esophagitis for DTJIR in the literature varies widely, ranging from 1.7% to 25%. However, most contemporary studies report rates concentrated at approximately 10% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>]. On the basis of retrospective data from our center, the incidence of reflux esophagitis for TA is approximately 5%. Therefore, the estimated incidence of reflux esophagitis was 10% in the DTJIR group and 5% in the TA group. With a significance level set at &#x03B1;=.025 (one sided), a power of 1 &#x2013; &#x03B2; of 0.80, a noninferiority margin of 0.05 (given the reported incidence of reflux esophagitis with the current surgical options, a noninferiority margin of &#x2264;5% was deemed clinically acceptable as such a difference would not offset the significant benefits associated with the new technique), a 1:1 ratio between the experimental and control groups, and an anticipated dropout rate of 10%, the sample size was calculated via the PASS software (NCSS, LLC). The resulting sample sizes for both groups were 120 patients each.</p><p>Therefore, a total of 240 patients will be included in this study, with 120 patients in the experimental group and 120 patients in the control group.</p></sec><sec id="s2-10"><title>Data Collection</title><p>Basic patient information and clinical data will be collected before discharge, including identity card number; gender; age; contact information; date of operation; surgical approach; duration of surgery; intraoperative blood loss; pathological tumor, node, metastasis staging; number of lymph nodes dissected; number of positive lymph nodes; length of postoperative hospital stay; and postoperative complications. Each patient will be followed up on at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months postoperatively, and the following data will be collected regarding their postoperative quality of life: daily meal frequency, Visick score, and postoperative quality of life score (using the EORTC QLQ-C30), as well as data on their postoperative nutritional status, including weight change, hemoglobin level, total protein level, albumin level, total lymphocyte count, and PNI.</p><p>The basic information and clinical data for each patient collected before discharge will be classified, stored, and entered into the database. The results of each follow-up will be meticulously recorded and entered into the database alongside the other data. All electronic data will be backed up to prevent loss.</p></sec><sec id="s2-11"><title>Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data analysis will be conducted by professional statisticians. In addition to the overall comparative analysis conducted between the TA and DTJIR groups, we will further perform subgroup analyses stratified by disease stage and surgical approach.</p><p>Intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches will be applied for efficacy analysis. An as-treated approach will be used for safety analysis. For continuous variables, a normality test will be performed first. For those that conform to a normal distribution, the 2-tailed <italic>t</italic> test will be used for statistical analysis (all continuous values will be expressed as means and SDs). Those not conforming to a normal distribution will be presented as quartiles and rank means, and the Mann-Whitney <italic>U</italic> test will be used to calculate the <italic>P</italic> value to compare differences between groups. For categorical variables, the chi-square test will be used for statistical analysis. Repeated-measure data will be analyzed using a mixed-effects model. Subgroup analyses will be conducted by disease stage (early vs advanced); surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted); age; macroscopic types; and tumor, node, metastasis stage. All <italic>P</italic> values calculated in the analysis will be 2-sided, and <italic>P</italic>&#x003C;.05 will be considered statistically significant. If missing data constitute more than 5%, multiple imputations will be conducted. Statistical analyses will be performed via SPSS (IBM Corp), Prism (GraphPad Software), or PASS.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><p>The first patient was enrolled in March 2022, and the recruitment of all 240 patients is expected to be completed by February 2027. Follow-up for these patients is scheduled to conclude in February 2028.</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>This study may demonstrate that tunnel anastomosis is an alternative method of digestive tract reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy that is as effective as DTJIR. Its antireflux effect may make it one of the most widely used methods of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy.</p><p>Proximal gastrectomy is gaining increasing acceptance among the medical community due to its advantages in postoperative nutrition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>]. However, for patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy, postoperative reflux esophagitis is a significant issue. Various anastomotic techniques have been investigated in an attempt to address this problem, yet a standard approach remains elusive [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>]. In pursuit of a superior method for digestive tract reconstruction, we modified the Kamikawa anastomosis to develop tunnel anastomosis and conducted a retrospective study. The retrospective study found that tunnel anastomosis is as effective as DTJIR at preventing reflux esophagitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>]. To further validate the preventive effect against reflux esophagitis of this technique, we will conduct this prospective study with the aim of providing a novel reference for digestive tract reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy. Compared with our previous study, this research has a clearly defined objective and rigorous structure. It can also reduce recall bias and control for confounding factors more effectively, yielding more reliable outcomes. Achieving strict adherence to the study protocol will also take longer.</p><p>To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study on this technique. To ensure the quality of the enrolled patients, we used stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria in this study. As this is a multicenter study, surgeons are required to possess extensive surgical experience to ensure the quality of the surgical procedures. The operative processes of patients will be documented through video and photographic records. We have also meticulously designed the subsequent follow-up and data analysis protocols. This well-considered design leads us to expect a genuine and reliable conclusion.</p><p>This study also has certain inherent limitations. It is not possible to blind patients, surgeons, radiologists, or clinical assessors in this trial. Both the physicians and patients have a clear understanding of the surgical procedure that will be performed. To minimize the bias introduced by the inability to implement blinding, the follow-up and data analysis will be conducted by different people. Meanwhile, as a prospective study, it may have the capacity to mitigate the impact of such bias on the results. The primary end point of this study is the 1-year incidence rate of reflux esophagitis. However, this fails to reflect the long-term antireflux effect. In the future, we will conduct longer-term follow-up to investigate the long-term efficacy of tunnel anastomosis. To increase the dissemination of our research, we will also present our study and its results at a wide range of academic conferences.</p></sec></body><back><ack><p>No artificial intelligence tools or services were used during the preparation of this work.</p></ack><notes><sec><title>Funding</title><p>This work was supported by the Yishan Research Project of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (YSZD202404); the Qunfeng Project of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (GFXK202503); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82203226, 82303602, and 82404002); the Research Project of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (ZL202101, XHMS202401, ZJ202220, ZJ202203, and RCQY202409); the Excellent Talent Program of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (2017YYCJH-08); the Jiangsu Provincial Association for Science and Technology Youth Talent Lifting Project (JSTJ-2023-WJ013); the Jiangsu Province "333 Project" High-Level Talent Training Program (2024-3-2249); and the Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission Research Project (MQ2024056).</p></sec><sec><title>Data Availability</title><p>The datasets generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p></sec></notes><fn-group><fn fn-type="con"><p>GL, CY, and RP were primarily responsible for the study design. GL designed the tunnel anastomosis technique. QX and RP drafted and revised the manuscript. X Wang and RP were responsible for the sample size calculation and randomization. GL, HX, MW, JZ, X Wu, and XZ were responsible for the administrative oversight of their respective centers. QX, RP, CY, WW, LH, HW, LC, RG, HC, XM, X Wen, WX, GS, HF, ZW, LY, XZ, X Wu, JZ, MW, HX, and GL were actively involved in the execution of the research and data collection, analysis, and interpretation. All the authors critically reviewed the manuscript, provided final approval of the version to be published, and reached a consensus on the journal for submission.</p></fn><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>None declared.</p></fn></fn-group><glossary><title>Abbreviations</title><def-list><def-item><term id="abb1">DTJIR</term><def><p>double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb2">EORTC QLQ-30</term><def><p>European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb3">LA</term><def><p>Los Angeles</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb4">PNI</term><def><p>prognostic nutritional index</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb5">TA</term><def><p>tunnel anastomosis</p></def></def-item></def-list></glossary><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="ref1"><label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>He</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Xia</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Cancer profiles in China and comparisons with the USA: a comprehensive analysis in the incidence, mortality, survival, staging, and attribution to risk factors</article-title><source>Sci China Life Sci</source><year>2024</year><month>01</month><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>122</fpage><lpage>131</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11427-023-2423-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">37755589</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Park</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Park</surname><given-names>YS</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahn</surname><given-names>SH</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HH</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy as a surgical treatment for upper third early gastric cancer</article-title><source>Korean J Gastroenterol</source><year>2017</year><month>09</month><day>25</day><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>134</fpage><lpage>140</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4166/kjg.2017.70.3.134</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">28934829</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>WJ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>HP</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Updates on global epidemiology, risk and prognostic factors of gastric cancer</article-title><source>World J Gastroenterol</source><year>2023</year><month>04</month><day>28</day><volume>29</volume><issue>16</issue><fpage>2452</fpage><lpage>2468</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3748/wjg.v29.i16.2452</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">37179585</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>J</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>X</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy with gastric tubular reconstruction and total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a matched cohort study</article-title><source>Front Surg</source><year>2023</year><month>01</month><day>12</day><volume>9</volume><fpage>1052643</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsurg.2022.1052643</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">36713677</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hirata</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HI</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Grotz</surname><given-names>TE</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Matsuda</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Badgwell</surname><given-names>BD</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ikoma</surname><given-names>N</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>The role of proximal gastrectomy in gastric cancer</article-title><source>Chin Clin Oncol</source><year>2022</year><month>10</month><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>39</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21037/cco-22-82</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">36336898</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ikeguchi</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kader</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Takaya</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Prognosis of patients with gastric cancer who underwent proximal gastrectomy</article-title><source>Int Surg</source><year>2012</year><volume>97</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>275</fpage><lpage>279</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9738/CC150.1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">23113860</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>I</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Oh</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Park</surname><given-names>SH</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Park</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Postoperative nutritional outcomes and quality of life-related complications of proximal versus total gastrectomy for upper-third early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis</article-title><source>Sci Rep</source><year>2020</year><month>12</month><day>8</day><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>21460</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-78458-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">33293604</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Park</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Han</surname><given-names>SU</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hyung</surname><given-names>WJ</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Effect of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction vs total gastrectomy on hemoglobin level and vitamin B12 supplementation in upper-third early gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial</article-title><source>JAMA Netw Open</source><year>2023</year><month>02</month><day>1</day><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>e2256004</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.56004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">36790808</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yamasaki</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Takiguchi</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Omori</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Multicenter prospective trial of total gastrectomy versus proximal gastrectomy for upper third cT1 gastric cancer</article-title><source>Gastric Cancer</source><year>2021</year><month>03</month><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>535</fpage><lpage>543</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10120-020-01129-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">33118118</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Total versus proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study</article-title><source>Int J Surg</source><year>2024</year><month>02</month><day>1</day><volume>110</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>1000</fpage><lpage>1007</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/JS9.0000000000000927</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">38085808</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rosa</surname><given-names>F</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Quero</surname><given-names>G</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fiorillo</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Total vs proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicenter western experience (on behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer-GIRCG)</article-title><source>Gastric Cancer</source><year>2018</year><month>09</month><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>845</fpage><lpage>852</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10120-018-0804-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">29423892</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahn</surname><given-names>SH</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Jung</surname><given-names>DH</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Son</surname><given-names>SY</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>CM</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Park</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HH</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer</article-title><source>Gastric Cancer</source><year>2014</year><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>562</fpage><lpage>570</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10120-013-0303-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24052482</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>QZ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>PC</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>YX</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Comparison of proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique and double-tract reconstruction for proximal early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis</article-title><source>Updates Surg</source><year>2023</year><month>12</month><volume>75</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>2117</fpage><lpage>2126</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13304-023-01638-w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">37728858</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Isobe</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hashimoto</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kizaki</surname><given-names>J</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Reconstruction methods and complications in proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, and a comparison with total gastrectomy</article-title><source>Kurume Med J</source><year>2014</year><volume>61</volume><issue>1-2</issue><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>29</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2739/kurumemedj.MS64003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25152248</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Saze</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kase</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Nakano</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Functional benefits of the double flap technique after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer</article-title><source>BMC Surg</source><year>2021</year><month>11</month><day>5</day><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>392</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12893-021-01390-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">34740344</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review</article-title><source>Medicine (Baltimore)</source><year>2018</year><volume>97</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>e0121</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/MD.0000000000010121</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">29538208</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ying</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>W</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>G</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Du</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Dang</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>The comparison of long-term oncological outcomes and complications after proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer</article-title><source>World J Surg Oncol</source><year>2023</year><month>03</month><day>23</day><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>101</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12957-023-02985-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">36949503</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>R</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Tunnel anastomosis: a modified flap technique in esophagogastrostomy as a novel antireflux technique after proximal gastrectomy</article-title><source>J Gastrointest Surg</source><year>2025</year><month>01</month><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>101871</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gassur.2024.10.026</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">39490562</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>HP</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>HX</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>GP</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>ZQ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>ZK</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>MC</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Technical variety of anastomotic techniques used in proximal gastrectomy with double-tract-reconstruction - a narrative review</article-title><source>Langenbecks Arch Surg</source><year>2024</year><month>05</month><day>2</day><volume>409</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>148</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00423-024-03339-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">38695994</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Miwa</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yokoyama</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hori</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Interobserver agreement in endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis using a modified Los Angeles classification incorporating grades N and M: a validation study in a cohort of Japanese endoscopists</article-title><source>Dis Esophagus</source><year>2008</year><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>355</fpage><lpage>363</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00788.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">18477259</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muraoka</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kobayashi</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kokudo</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with the hinged double flap method</article-title><source>World J Surg</source><year>2016</year><month>10</month><volume>40</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>2419</fpage><lpage>2424</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00268-016-3510-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">27094564</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>KK</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>YY</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Current status of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy in proximal gastric cancer: technical details and oncologic outcomes</article-title><source>Asian J Surg</source><year>2021</year><month>01</month><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>54</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.09.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">32981822</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>B</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>B</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Shan</surname><given-names>F</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life of reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title><source>BMC Cancer</source><year>2024</year><month>01</month><day>10</day><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>56</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12885-024-11827-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">38200411</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shaibu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mzee</surname><given-names>SA</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Theophilus</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Danbala</surname><given-names>IA</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Effects of reconstruction techniques after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title><source>World J Surg Oncol</source><year>2020</year><month>07</month><day>16</day><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>171</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12957-020-01936-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">32677956</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahn</surname><given-names>SH</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>JH</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Park</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HH</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Comparative study of clinical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for proximal gastric cancer</article-title><source>Gastric Cancer</source><year>2013</year><month>07</month><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>282</fpage><lpage>289</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10120-012-0178-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">22821182</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref></ref-list><app-group><supplementary-material id="app1"><label>Checklist 1</label><p>SPIRIT checklist.</p><media xlink:href="resprot_v15i1e82712_app1.pdf" xlink:title="PDF File, 112 KB"/></supplementary-material></app-group></back></article>