A trained member of the research team will clearly and concisely explain the study’s objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits to the participants. Each participant will receive a copy of the informed consent form, which has been approved by the Council on Ethics in Human Research from the Instituto Superior Universitario “Portoviejo” (CEISH-ITSUP). This document provides comprehensive details about the study and outlines participants’ rights, including their ability to withdraw at any time without penalty. Participants will be given sufficient time to review the form and ask any relevant questions. Both members of each couple must provide their consent to participate in the study.

The investigator responsible will document the informed consent process, ensuring that each participant’s signature and the date of consent are properly recorded. Personal information, including participants’ names, contact details, and unique identification codes, will be collected during enrollment and stored separately from the study data. Participants will not receive any compensation for their participation.

This study was reviewed and approved by the CEISH-ITSUP (681428096; Multimedia Appendix 1). The study was registered in Clinical Trials (NCT06501729; Multimedia Appendix 2). The study protocol was structured according to the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidelines (Multimedia Appendix 3).

The protocol will be carried out using a parallel 3-arm randomized controlled design. It will evaluate whether the act of kissing on the mouth between 2 people can cause the pH of saliva to increase after consuming sugary or fermented beverages. The initial pH will be obtained from participants who meet the inclusion criteria. After recording the initial pH, participants will be given 200 mL of one of the beverages selected for the study (Coca-Cola, Cifrut, or nonalcoholic beer). After ingesting the beverage, the participants will be asked to drool into a test tube to measure the pH of the saliva using a pH meter. Based on the literature, it is expected that the pH will decrease. After this measurement, the experimental groups will be asked to kiss their partners, and the control group will not do so. The pH of the saliva will be measured for a third time 5 minutes after ingesting the beverage to record the changes. This will be done repeatedly, every 5 minutes, until the pH of the saliva reaches a neutral level (6.8-7.2).

The difference between the experimental groups is that, in one, only one person from the kissing couple will have a sugary or fermented beverage, and in the other, both individuals will consume the sugary or fermented beverage. Each week, a different beverage will be tested; that is, in week 1, Coca-Cola will be used, in week 2 artificial fruit juice, and in week 3 nonalcoholic beer.

This randomized controlled trial will be conducted according to the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) checklist and guidelines, as outlined in Figure 1 [14].

Some physiological and pathological conditions could alter the pH of saliva, which could bias the results of this study. Therefore, the aim is to select couples aged between 18 and 30 years, the age at which the probability of having chronic degenerative diseases is lower. In addition, all volunteers who enroll will undergo an oral examination to determine their oral health, and those with abscesses, extensive carious cavities (level 5 or 6 according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System), periodontal disease, or other alterations that may modify the salivary pH will be excluded. Furthermore, participants must not undergo medical treatment that requires them to consume medications that change the pH of their saliva.

These criteria were selected to minimize confounding factors that could alter salivary pH, such as systemic diseases, abscesses, or the influence of medications. The age range of 18-30 years was chosen to reduce the likelihood of undiagnosed chronic systemic diseases, as no specific tests will be conducted to confirm their absence; participant responses will be accepted as valid. Additionally, requiring participants to already have a romantic partner ensures that the study is conducted ethically and avoids potential discomfort from pairing participants with strangers.

The recruitment process will involve an open call via social media platforms targeting university students, although being a student is not an inclusion criterion. Flyers with a QR code and a registration link will direct interested individuals to a Google Form where they will provide initial data. Eligible participants will be contacted to schedule an oral health assessment and complete a health questionnaire to confirm compliance with the inclusion criteria.

To select the participating couples, a call will be made to students of the Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil and members of the general public within the established age range. To participate in the study, participants must agree, together with their partner, to be part of the research and sign the informed consent form. The couples will be divided into three groups: 1 control group and 2 experimental groups. However, all participants must register with their partners because the group assignment will not be revealed until the day of saliva sample collection. The sex of the participants will be balanced among the groups, ensuring equal representation of men and women. Additionally, all participants must meet the inclusion criteria detailed in this document.

The sample size was calculated using the G*Power statistical software (version 3.1.9.7, Heinrich-Heine-University). Data from a pilot study by Uma et al [11] were used to estimate the necessary sample size. This study provided the following values for the calculation: control group mean 7.10, SD 0.18 and experimental group mean 6.86, SD 0.18. Based on these parameters, the effect size for ANOVA was calculated to be 0.76, which corresponds to a large effect size.

Using the parameters α=.05, power=0.95, and 3 groups, the G*Power software indicated that a minimum of 30 participating couples (10 per group) is required. To account for potential dropouts, an additional 20% (n=6) will be recruited, resulting in a total of 36 participating couples (12 couples per group). This calculation ensures sufficient statistical power while maintaining logistical feasibility.

Randomization will be carried out by an external researcher to whom lists of coded pairs will be given. The researcher will use the randomized website to create 3 lists, one for each group. In this way, each couple will be assigned to 3 different groups. The control group will include participants who will not engage in the kissing intervention. This group serves as a baseline for evaluating the natural recovery process of salivary pH after consuming acidic beverages. The first experimental group will have one partner consume the acidic beverage, and then the couple will engage in a 40-second kiss. This allows evaluation of the effect of kissing when only one partner has an acidic pH alteration. The second experimental group will have both partners consume the acidic beverage before engaging in the 40-second kiss. This setup examines whether mutual exposure to acidic conditions influences the efficacy of kissing in restoring salivary pH. In summary, the groups will be as follows:

The act of kissing will be an intervention that we try to associate with an increase in salivary pH after its decrease. To do so, the experimental groups will kiss with their partner after ingesting one of the beverages, followed by a series of pH measurements. First, the baseline pH of the participants’ unstimulated saliva will be taken, and then they will be given 200 mL of the beverage to be tested that week. After verifying that the beverage was completely ingested by the participants, they will wait 1 minute before providing a new saliva sample to verify the decrease in pH. After recording the second measurement, the participants in the experimental groups will be asked to kiss with their partner for 40 seconds. Participants will be instructed to make this kiss “passionate.” After that time, participants will wait 4 minutes and 20 seconds (remaining time to complete 5 minutes), and a saliva sample will be taken again to record the pH. Except for the act of kissing, the same will be done with the control group, with a saliva sample taken every 5 minutes for the next 40 minutes, which is when physiological re-establishment of salivary pH is expected.

A pH meter measures the hydrogen ion activity in a solution, which is indicative of its acidity or basicity. The device typically uses a glass electrode as a pH sensor, which interacts with hydrogen ions in the solution to produce an electrical potential that can be translated into a pH value. This value is displayed on a readout, often a liquid crystal display, which may also show temperature readings owing to the influence of temperature on pH measurements.

The saliva sample for pH measurement will not be stimulated because the increase in fluid alters the pH; thus, a reduced sample is expected to be obtained. For this reason, a thin electrode will be used so that it can enter the bottom of the test tube and capture the measurement. For this purpose, the Mettler Toledo InLab Micro pH sensor with the following technical characteristics was chosen:

The first outcome will be the time required for salivary pH to return to baseline after being lowered by kissing a person who has not consumed a beverage. To determinate this, salivary pH will be measured every 5 minutes using a calibrated pH meter. The second outcome will be the time required for salivary pH to return to baseline after 2 people kiss, both of whom will have consumed a beverage that lowers pH. Finally, the average salivary pH of each group will be compared at each 5-minute interval.

Data analysis will be performed using SPSS Statistics software (version 21.0; IBM Corporation). Data will be presented as descriptive statistics and examined for missing values, outliers, normality, and homogeneity. To compare descriptive variables between groups, the t test will be used for quantitative variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests will be applied to assess normality and homogeneity of variances, especially for salivary pH measurements. Comparisons of mean salivary pH values between the 3 groups will be conducted using repeated-measures ANOVA if assumptions are met. When normality or sphericity assumptions are violated, alternative methods such as the Friedman test or generalized linear models with interaction terms and covariates (eg, type of beverage and time point) will be considered. Additionally, within-group changes in salivary pH over time will be analyzed using paired-sample tests or their nonparametric equivalents.

This study proposes an innovative hypothesis that the act of kissing may accelerate the recovery of salivary pH following the consumption of acidic beverages. By facilitating salivary exchange between individuals, kissing may help neutralize the acidic environment created by sugary or fermented drinks. The findings of this study could have implications for how natural interpersonal behaviors contribute to maintaining oral pH homeostasis.

The experimental design allows for the comparison of 3 groups to evaluate whether the buffering capacity of one partner’s saliva can affect the oral environment of the other. This investigation seeks to determine whether the salivary pH in participants who engage in kissing returns to neutral more quickly than in those who do not kiss. This may serve as evidence of an additional, natural protective mechanism against acidogenic dietary habits—one that involves behavioral factors rather than pharmacological or mechanical intervention.

Previous studies have confirmed that the consumption of sugary or acidic beverages leads to a rapid decline in salivary pH, often reaching values below the critical threshold for enamel demineralization. These drinks can prolong an acidic oral environment for up to 40 minutes or more, depending on individual salivary flow and buffering capacity [15,16]. Although several approaches have been proposed to counteract this effect, such as dairy product intake, chewing sugar-free gum, or using mouth rinses, no previous studies have evaluated whether natural behaviors like kissing could offer similar benefits.

Other research has explored nonconventional approaches. For instance, the effect of fermented yogurt on the oral cavity demonstrated positive outcomes for maintaining salivary pH [16], and pineapple juice fermented with probiotics showed a limited but measurable influence on pH recovery [17]. However, these studies relied on biochemical mechanisms rather than behavioral dynamics. This study is the first to evaluate whether intimate human interaction can function similarly by transmitting buffering agents through saliva, thus supporting oral pH recovery.

This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. The experimental conditions involve an arbitrary time of 40 seconds for kissing, which lacks direct precedent in the literature. Additionally, salivary pH measurements will be taken every 5 minutes, a frequency commonly used in similar protocols but still based on convention rather than robust comparative trials. The beverages used in this study—Coca-Cola, Cifrut, and nonalcoholic beer—reflect consumer preferences in Guayaquil, Ecuador, but may not be representative of other populations.

Furthermore, couples who participate may not kiss in the same way as they would in private, as some participants may feel inhibited or perform differently knowing they are part of a research setting. These behavioral variables may influence the results and are difficult to control.

Another limitation is related to sample composition. Most participants will be university students from middle-income urban backgrounds. This restricts the generalizability of the findings to the broader population, especially those with different sociodemographic profiles or baseline oral health conditions.

Should this study demonstrate a measurable benefit of kissing in restoring salivary pH, it would introduce a novel behavioral approach to oral health maintenance. While this is not intended to replace traditional preventive methods, such as brushing, flossing, and dietary control, it may serve as a complementary insight into how natural human interactions influence oral physiology.

This concept may also have implications for health education strategies. For example, oral health promotion campaigns, particularly those targeting adolescents and young adults, could benefit from including accessible, behaviorally relevant messages. Digital platforms and mobile health applications that disseminate oral hygiene habits might consider integrating insights from this study to make content more relatable and engaging [18,19].

Future studies could build upon these findings by exploring the effects of varying kiss durations, frequency, and intensity on salivary pH recovery. It would also be valuable to assess whether long-term behavioral patterns involving intimate salivary exchange can influence the oral microbiome and its association with dental caries. Further interdisciplinary research combining microbiology, behavioral science, and preventive dentistry is encouraged. Such efforts could help establish whether kissing may be a meaningful component in the broader framework of natural strategies for oral health preservation.

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of kissing on salivary pH and its potential function in preventing dental caries. The findings of this study will provide valuable insights into the relationship between kissing and oral health. Previous research has suggested that salivary pH can affect the development of dental caries, but the role of kissing in this process has not been extensively studied. This study is crucial because it could lead to a better understanding of the factors that contribute to oral health and the prevention of dental caries. The results of this study will be compared to those of previous research on the relationship between salivary pH and dental caries. The findings of this study may contradict existing beliefs regarding the role of kissing in oral health. The study will be supported by relevant literature and data on saliva pH and dental caries. This study will contribute to the field of oral health research and provide valuable information for the development of preventive measures against dental caries.

Despite the limitations described in our research, the methodology that is intended to be applied, the times of the measurements, and the choice of beverages are supported by other studies that will allow our results to be replicable, verifiable, and comparable with other research. Furthermore, if our hypothesis can be verified, we will have a new preventive measure against the decrease in salivary pH and its consequent risk of dental caries, which is as common and free as kisses between 2 people who are in a relationship.