This scoping review will follow Arksey and O’Malley’s [17] scoping review framework and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist (Multimedia Appendix 1) [18]. Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, this study will be organized into 5 stages: (1) identification of the research question; (2) examination of relevant studies; (3) study selection; (4) data extraction; and (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the research findings [17].

The primary and secondary research questions were created to examine the existing literature on rural older adults’ perspectives of falls prevention. Specifically, the primary question was developed to understand how rural older adults view falls prevention overall. The secondary questions were created to explore how rural older adults view their risk of falls and to identify what they consider to be contributing factors of falls. It is important to note that these questions focus on examining rural older adults’ perspectives of prevention and risk, without focusing on fall experiences. Questions about fall experiences were avoided to align with existing research that shows that older adults focus on fall perspectives and implications rather than the fall experience itself [19]. Accordingly, it is important to emphasize that our study focuses on understanding rural older adults’ perspectives of falls prevention and not experiences. We have included our primary and secondary research questions below:

An expert librarian was consulted to recommend the most relevant databases. Based on the librarian’s expertise, a broad search on EBSCO Discovery Service was conducted to identify the most applicable databases. Based on the librarian’s expert guidance, 5 databases were searched: CINAHL, PubMed, Academic Search Complete, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Studies were also obtained by searching for bibliographic references of relevant studies. The time frame of the search will focus on papers published over the past 10 years from January 2013 to December 31, 2023. These dates were chosen to identify the most recent and up-to-date literature available. The keywords that were included in this search strategy are documented in Table 1. For example, the search string for CINAHL was (falls prevention or preventing falls or prevent falls or reduce falls or fall mitigation or fall risk reduction) AND (older adults or elderly or seniors or geriatrics or geriatric or seniors or aging or older people) AND (rural or rurality or underserved) AND (perceptions or attitudes or opinion or perspectives or view). Regarding our search terms, it is important to note that existing research shows that perspectives and experiences cannot be used interchangeably. For example, older adults tend to focus on the antecedents and consequences of falls rather than the fall experience itself [19]. Consequently, our search terms focused strategically on words related to prevention rather than experiences because our research aims to highlight the perspectives of rural older adults.

Publications will be included in this scoping review if they meet the following 4 criteria: (1) full text, peer-reviewed journal papers; (2) written in the English language; (3) published from 2013 to 2024; and (4) focus on older adults’ perceptions about falls among those living in rural communities. This study will include publications with different research methods such as qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies. Exclusion criteria will include the following: (1) papers that do not report on original research (such as commentaries and editorials), (2) papers published in languages that are not English, and (3) papers that do not address the research topic.

Five electronic databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Academic Search Complete, PsycINFO, and Scopus) will be searched for relevant literature, and the results will be imported into Covidence software to aid in the organization and management in the review’s selection and screening process [20]. Guided by the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2 reviewers will perform the study selection process. A PRISMA diagram will be used to document the scoping review’s study identification, selection, and screening process.

The data will be charted and extracted using a standardized data extraction table in Microsoft Word. The table will consist of different categories to help chart and organize the data, including the author, publication year, country of origin, purpose of the study, methods, and findings. We will also have a category to collect information to address the question-related themes, including information related to fall-related risks, contributing factors of falls, and/or mitigation strategies. Exploring this information will allow the researchers to effectively synthesize the existing information on falls prevention among rural older adults. This table will be assessed with 4 papers to ensure that the table adequately captures the data, and no missing categories are required to address the research questions.

Guided by Braun and Clarke [21], we will analyze our scoping review data by using thematic analysis. Specifically, our process of thematic analysis will consist of using a deductive approach where our research process will be guided by our pre-established research questions. For examples, our codes will be guided by using our research questions (fall-related risks, contributing factors, and mitigation strategies), and our themes will be created by organizing our codes into theme and subtheme piles to ensure that our themes align with addressing our research objectives. Our theme names will be refined to ensure clarity, uniqueness, and that they provide insight into addressing each of our research questions.

Measures will be taken to support rigor in the data. For example, dependability will be accomplished by keeping a comprehensive audit trail to document the research steps and decisions made throughout the process [21]. Reflexivity will be integrated by reflecting and mitigating authors’ potential biases and assumptions during the data synthesis and the development of themes. Additionally, confirmability will be incorporated through peer debriefing and reviewing interpretations to ensure the findings are representative of the data.

Our scoping review will aim to examine the literature on rural older adults’ perspectives of falls prevention. Supporting falls prevention and independence of older adults in rural communities is critical for several unique factors ranging from education to geography. More specifically, research suggests that rural older adults often lack education and awareness of falls prevention and have an increased risk of falling compared to their urban counterparts [4]. Research shows that increased risk of falls may be related to rural older adults’ day-to-day activities, geography [5], and physical environments such as uneven walkways [22]. Across diverse global contexts, rural older adults often face limited treatment options due to issues of inadequate public transportation, geographical distance, social isolation, and reduced access to health care and support services [4,23-26]. Consequently, falls prevention is vital to supporting older adults’ independence to protect themselves from issues of social isolation, loss of selfhood, and fears of dependency [27]. Additionally, falls can cause severe injury, dependence, and mortality among older adults and are costly to the health care system [2]. Each year, falls cost the health care system in Canada approximately CAD 2 billion (USD 1.48 billion) [7] and upwards of CAD 68 billion (~USD 50 billion) worldwide [26].

Although research addresses falls prevention among older adults, there is a notable lack of discussion focusing directly on the perspectives of rural older adults. However, older adults’ perspectives of falls prevention are important because research shows that they have unique views regarding falls [19,28]. For example, Zecevic and colleagues [19] reported that older adults tend to focus on the causes and implications of falls, whereas researchers often emphasize the fall itself. Accordingly, the findings from this review will have important implications for rural policy makers, practitioners, and community leaders who are dedicated to addressing falls prevention in rural communities. Understanding the unique views and perspectives of older adults will inform the development of targeted strategies and actions to enhance falls prevention in rural communities.

This scoping review will be completed in a rigorous and comprehensive manner. However, it is important to note that our review may include potential limitations. For example, our review will be limited to literature published in peer-reviewed journal papers in the English language. Thus, information in gray literature will be excluded from this study. Future reviews may expand their search to include gray literature and unpublished materials. It should be noted that future reviews using gray literature should be cautious, as gray literature is often not peer-reviewed. Another limitation is that only papers in the English language will be included in this review. However, there may be relevant peer-reviewed literature published in languages other than English. Accordingly, future research should consider examining non-English language literature on rural older adults’ perspectives of falls prevention.

Understanding rural older adults’ perspectives of falls prevention is essential to supporting independence and healthy aging in rural communities. Although research addresses falls prevention among older adults, there is a notable lack of discussion focusing directly on the perspectives of rural older adults. This scoping review on falls prevention may have important implications for rural community leaders, policy makers, and health practitioners working to support falls prevention for older adults living in rural communities.