ResProt JMIR Res Protoc JMIR Research Protocols 1929-0748 JMIR Publications Toronto, Canada v14i1e58271 39823587 10.2196/58271 Protocol Protocol Decentralized Management of Home Care Services for Seniors: Protocol for a Participatory Action Research Schwartz Amy Silva Kenia Lara Macdonald Marilyn Yarmohammadian Mohammad Hossein Savaria Virginie BEd, MAdm 1 2 https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7738-5409 Queenton Johanne BA, MA, PhD 1 2 https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9116-688X Carrier Annie BPS, BSc, LLM, MSc, PhD 1
Université de Sherbrooke 3001 12e Avenue Nord Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4 Canada 1 8198218000 ext 72917 Annie.Carrier@USherbrooke.ca
2 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-6098 Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke, QC Canada Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement Sherbrooke, QC Canada Corresponding Author: Annie Carrier Annie.Carrier@USherbrooke.ca 2025 17 1 2025 14 e58271 15 3 2024 2 10 2024 14 11 2024 19 11 2024 ©Virginie Savaria, Johanne Queenton, Annie Carrier. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 17.01.2025. 2025

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

 Background

The centralization of decision-making power in the public health care system has a negative impact on the practice of professionals and the quality of home care services (HCS) for seniors. To improve HCS, decentralized management could be a particularly promising approach. To be effective, strategies designed to incorporate this management approach require attention to 3 elements: autonomy of local stakeholders, individual and organizational capacities, and accountability for actions and decisions. Not many studies have focused on strategies for integrating decentralized and collaborative management at the local level in HCS.

 Objective

The overall aim of this study is to coconstruct HCS management strategies and explore decentralized practices in the day-to-day work of low-level managers and professionals. The specific objectives, in collaboration with local HCS stakeholders, are to (1) identify concrete and achievable strategies for decentralized management, and (2) describe factors (facilitators and obstacles) that could potentially influence their integration.

 Methods

This participatory action research involves a cyclical process. Before initiating the cycles, a preliminary stage consists of forming a steering committee composed of managers (n=3), professionals (n=3), seniors (n=3), informal caregivers (n=3), and the research team (n=3). This committee will facilitate multistakeholder consultation to coconstruct local management strategies based on a real-life problem identified by the committee. The steering committee will also guide the research process. The first cycle will consist of establishing an initial plan of decentralized management strategies. During the observation phase, meetings of 4 homogeneous focus groups, including managers, professionals, seniors, and informal caregivers, will be held. During the reflection phase, a thematic analysis will be carried out, and data will be interpreted and validated by the steering committee. Then, in the action phase, results will be presented to managers and professionals so that they can coconstruct a plan of decentralized management strategies to prioritize. The second cycle will explore the factors involved. The observation, reflection, and action phases will be repeated. Ultimately, the results of the 2 cycles will be integrated in a model coconstructed by the steering committee.

 Results

Data collection is in progress; the partnership officially began on February 1, 2024, and the plan is to continue data collection through 2025. The steering committee will validate the data to ensure that they are accurate and that the results reflect the reality of local stakeholders.

 Conclusions

By identifying decentralized and collaborative management strategies at the local level as well as factors to facilitate their integration in HCS, this approach can be used for other decentralized management projects in different areas of the health care system. This study will give decision makers insight into strategies aimed at improving the management of their institution, which will enhance seniors’ well-being and the quality of their health care services.

 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/58271

 health system decentralization management home care services seniors collaboration Introduction Background

Over the past 4 decades, health care systems in most countries have been reshaped by reforms based on new public management (NPM) [1]. NPM aims to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of services by focusing on results-based management and cost control [2]. Inspired by NPM [3,4], the last 2 health and social service reforms in the Canadian province of Québec made a shift toward the centralization of management practices [5,6]. With the aim of improving health system performance, the 2003 [7] and 2015 reforms [8,9] gradually concentrated decision-making power, responsibilities, and control, and moved them from lower management to the senior management level of the health system [3,6]. The trend toward centralized management seems to be continuing with the new 2024 reform [10-12], which will concentrate decision-making power in the hands of a new agency called Santé Québec [13]. Such centralization of decision-making power necessarily relies on management by results, accountability, and partial privatization of services [9,14]. Consequently, departmental priorities focus on effectiveness and efficiency [14]. The changes resulting from centralized management can have an impact on the conditions of practice of local stakeholders [14], including low-level managers, professionals, seniors, and informal caregivers. These changes also influence the quality of home care services (HCS) for seniors [14], a sector where demand is increasing as the population ages [15,16]. Centralization reduces the latitude of managers and professionals [5], which in turn is associated with a reduction in how meaningful they find their work [14,17]. Their ability to offer services that are accessible and adapted to the needs of the population diminishes [18-20]. Professionals and seniors agree that the continuity and quality of HCS must be improved [18].

To address the present challenges faced by HCS, decentralization could be a particularly promising approach [5,21]. Decentralization implies the delegation of decision-making, power, and responsibilities [21]. The decentralization process involves reconfiguring relations among the national, regional, and local levels to work toward collaborative vertical and horizontal management [22]. A decentralization process involves decentralized management strategies, which are management practices that promote the delegation of decision-making, power, and responsibilities from a higher to a lower level [23]. To be effective, local decentralized management involves three elements: (1) delegating authority to lower-level managers and professionals, (2) strengthening their individual and organizational capacities, and (3) sharing accountability for decisions to be made [23]. Decentralization has the potential to improve the performance of the health system [21,24], the efficient allocation of material and human resources, and responsiveness to the needs of seniors [22].

Moving toward decentralized management is particularly relevant when we consider the main effects of the current centralized management on the health system in Québec. First, administrative reforms and a centralized management approach can reduce the autonomy of professionals [4,14], whose decisions must be approved by senior management, which delays the taking of concrete action in the field [5,19]. The centralization of decision-making power and formalized communication mechanisms limit direct relationships between different local stakeholders [19]. Second, the standardization of practices and use of statistics have increased the focus on performance optimization (eg, cost-effectiveness) [19]. On the one hand, the management and organizational techniques put in place to optimize the work of professionals (eg, standardized clinical tools) [14] require them to invest a great deal of time in their daily tasks [15,19], which decreases the time they devote to direct care for seniors [14,19]. On the other hand, this standardization leads to a tightening of HCS allocation criteria, which impacts the accessibility of services [19]. Some seniors are being denied services, although they were eligible before the 2015 reform [19]. Third, there is a wide gap between the expectations of professionals and managers [15]. Professionals are mainly concerned with improving the quality of care and services for seniors [15]. Managers are more focused on the performance of HCS. For example, HCS must contribute to reducing hospitalization times and increasing the number of seniors who received services [15]. Fourth, services are developed in silos, without any overall coordination [25,26]. This leads to the duplication of services, blurred roles for each HCS provider, a lack of coordination, and competition between service providers [27]. As a result, overly centralized management has negative effects on the practice of professionals and the quality of services for seniors.

Now that the Québec government has made decentralization a priority [28-30], documenting decentralized management in its HCS becomes relevant. Some studies have examined the integration of decentralization in a health care system but generally only from the viewpoint of evaluating this in a specific context. However, each health system has its own management context and structure [31]. Thus, in today’s hypercentralized system, bringing decision-making closer to Québec managers, professionals, seniors, and informal caregivers requires finding a way to integrate decentralized management strategies at the local level of HCS. This study aims to answer the following question: To integrate decentralized management in HCS effectively, what potential strategies should be used and what factors should be considered? The overall aim of this study is to coconstruct HCS decentralized management strategies in the day-to-day work of low-level managers and professionals. The specific objectives, in collaboration with local HCS stakeholders, are to (1) identify concrete and achievable strategies for decentralized management, and (2) describe factors (facilitators and obstacles) that could potentially influence their integration.

 Theoretical Model

According to the theoretical model of Ohrling and colleagues [24], decentralization is a dynamic process that evolves over time and in which three elements interact: (1) delegation of authority to local stakeholders, (2) strengthening of individual and organizational capacities, and (3) accountability for actions and decisions. Authority refers to the different degrees of decision-making power and autonomy delegated to lower levels of managers and professionals [24]. To achieve a balanced distribution of authority at different levels of management, managers need to identify tasks and decisions that can be delegated. To ensure that the selection of priorities is in line with the needs of seniors, managers must have a certain amount of latitude in their decision-making [32]. Thus, strategies that support effective decentralized management involve low-level managers having sufficient authority to select those priorities, identify tasks and decisions that can be delegated, and allocate resources [24]. Capacities involve the possibility of strengthening individual and organizational abilities to assume delegated decision-making power and responsibilities [24]. The individual ability of managers and professionals to take the initiative is based on their personal aptitudes [33]. As for organizational capabilities, certain norms and culture help encourage the initiatives of managers and professionals [24]. Finally, managers and professionals need to be accountable for their decisions and their impacts on HCS [24]. This element involves specifying how responsibilities will be integrated and distributed between managers at all levels and professionals [24]. Also, to facilitate the delegation of authority and sharing of responsibility, managers and professionals should coordinate services, ensure quality, and meet institutional standards [24]. To be effective, strategies must include a sufficient degree of delegation, combined with the capacity on the part of local stakeholders and institutions to make choices in line with optimized performance and to be accountable for these choices aligned with local needs and priorities [34].

 Literature Review

This study addresses the question: What potential strategies should be used and what factors should be considered to effectively integrate decentralized management into HCS? Based on the 3 elements of the model of effective decentralization (authority, capacity, and accountability) [24], the literature review presents these strategies and factors.

Decentralizing Management: Strategies to Be Explored at the Local Level

The main strategy of authority involves establishing clear policies that contain guidelines regarding the changes to be made to the degree of autonomy and decision-making power at each management level (provincial, regional, and local) [35-37]. When local stakeholders are involved in developing them, these policies are closer to local needs and improve the quality of services [38]. However, these policies often have gray areas that make them difficult to integrate at the local level [37], such as poor communication between provincial, regional, and local levels regarding policy applications [35,39]. Furthermore, it is important to consider the financial dimension of HCS with respect to managers’ decision-making power over budget allocation [23]. This strategy involves increasing local control and autonomy over budget management, including the choice of how to allocate funds [40,41]. This control enables choices to be made in line with local needs, which leads to more responsive services [41].

Capacity strategies comprise ways to increase managers’ individual capabilities. For example, training programs should focus on managerial leadership skills, health management organization, and organizational changes to come with decentralized management strategies [33,35]. To increase organization capacity and sustain local control and autonomy with respect to budget management requires a system for allocating financial resources [37]. Under such a system, the provincial level retains the power to divide tax revenues equitably between various local institutions [40,42].

Accountability calls for a variety of strategies that are easier to integrate at the local level and have more lasting positive effects [40]. The most promising of these strategies is, first, the creation of clinical networks or committees that give local stakeholders a voice with HCS senior management [38,43]. Second, one of the most common strategies is to reorganize responsibilities between the central government and the local institutions to increase the latters’ autonomy [24,36,37,41,44,45]. Third, the reorganization of human resources management responsibilities includes increasing the decision-making power of local organizations in recruiting and training professionals [36,37,46]. A fourth strategy is to have provincial and regional levels use a bottom-up approach to plan health priorities that involve local managers and communities in identifying initiatives and projects for strategic planning of HCS [47,48]. A fifth strategy involves local managers using clear report cards that include objectives, concrete strategies, and performance indicators for decentralization-related changes in the institution [24].

 Factors Influencing the Integration of Decentralized Management Strategies

Factors facilitating (n=8) the integration of decentralized management strategies are presented first, followed by factors representing obstacles (n=7). Regarding authority, 2 facilitators encourage the delegation of decision-making power to lower-level managers and professionals [24]. The willingness of managers at different levels to delegate certain tasks and responsibilities encourages their participation in the integration of decentralized management strategies [32]. Coaching senior managers through monthly meetings can help build a relationship of trust between the provincial and local levels [49]. Senior management’s commitment helps motivate lower-level managers to take on accountability [39]. Two facilitators can help strengthen organizational capacities, leading to enhanced integration of decentralized management strategies [24]. First, the institution must have the material, human, and financial resources needed to put the strategies into practice [35,46,48,50]. For example, quality equipment (such as a high-performance IT system) [39], the right infrastructure, a qualified workforce, and budget planning facilitate the integration of changes linked to decentralization [35]. Creating a culture of mutual trust within the institution encourages managers and professionals to take the initiative and make decisions [33]. In terms of individual capacities, 2 facilitators reflect the personal skills of managers at different levels and professionals [33]. The first concerns coping strategies for managers and professionals, which are methods they can put in place to help them reorganize their work routines [51]. These methods enable them to spend more time on their new tasks and responsibilities, for instance, by reducing the number of meetings they need to attend [41,51]. Senior managers can help by limiting the amount of bureaucracy they have to deal with [33,52]. The second facilitator is the leadership skills of managers at different levels. These skills can facilitate the integration of decentralization to define new relationships with provincial and regional levels, plan resource allocation, build a new shared vision, and lead change [43,53]. Two facilitators are associated with accountability. Clarity of roles and responsibilities between provincial and local levels regarding resource allocation and accountability for action enables proactive integration of decentralized management strategies [33,47]. Collaboration between provincial and local levels facilitates the integration of a budget that respects local needs, strategic direction, and government priorities [46].

Several factors stand in the way of integrating decentralized management strategies. Regarding authority, 2 factors make it more difficult for the provincial level to delegate to lower levels [24]. Difficulties communicating between the provincial level and local institutions regarding the execution of a policy or reform can lead to confusion [37,41,51]. As a result, a gap may be created between policy and its implementation [39]. Good communication means that information about the new policy to be implemented is clear, accurate, and transmitted to the right individuals [39]. Moreover, when the provincial level decides to retain a high degree of control over local institutions, it is more difficult to integrate decentralized management strategies [41,47]. Local managers then lack autonomy [41] and decision-making power [36], which makes it difficult to lead change. As for organizational capacity, lack of resources and funds can limit the changes to be integrated [46,49,51,52]. Concerning individual capacity, limited managerial skills [49,54], and lack of preparation [48,51] can affect managers’ ability to make decisions in their new role and demotivate them [48]. In addition, 2 obstacles are associated with accountability for coordinating quality services aligned with local needs [24]. A lack of clarity in roles and responsibilities is a source of confusion when new responsibilities linked to decentralized management strategies are added [37,38]. Managers and professionals then find it difficult to assume their new responsibilities, for which they may be accountable. The second obstacle concerns budget allocation based on the central government’s political motivations. This factor can create a gap between government funding and actual budgetary needs at the local level [46].

The studies discussed in the aforementioned literature review are useful as they focus on decentralized management strategies and factors likely to influence their integration. However, some of them were carried out in countries where the political, organizational, and legal structures of the health care system differ from those in Canada and Québec [24,29,55]. Furthermore, some studies did not involve the participation of all local stakeholders in developing decentralized management strategies. As a result, none of them fully captures the complexity of the dynamic and evolving process of decentralization and the factors that can influence it in the Québec context.

 Methods Design

To meet our objectives, a participatory action research (PAR) design was chosen [56]. The PAR design gives HCS stakeholders the power and the tools to explore and coconstruct management strategies adapted to their context and to solve a specific problem that they have identified [56]. The study will start with a preliminary stage, followed by 2 cycles, each composed of 3 phases (observation, reflection, and action), and end with a modeling stage (Figure 1 [57]). The preliminary stage consists of selecting the research site and forming a steering committee. The first cycle will establish a plan of decentralized management strategies (objective 1). The second cycle will consolidate the decentralized management strategy plan and anticipate its integration in HCS by describing factors that could potentially influence the integration of these strategies (objective 2). Finally, the modeling stage will combine the results of the 2 cycles and consolidate the decentralized management strategy plan. A cyclical reflective process is necessary for PAR to ensure constant 2-way feedback between theory and practice [58,59].

Cyclical process of participatory action research based on the participatory action research model developed by Roy and Prévost [57]. HCS: home care services.

 Study Components (Preliminary Stage)

To define the problem and initiate the PAR process, a steering committee will be set up, composed of 3 managers, 3 professionals, 3 seniors, and 3 informal caregivers identified at the site as well as 3 members of the research team (VS, JQ, and AC). Each type of stakeholder will be equally represented to encourage constructive exchanges and ensure that all steering committee participants feel free to express themselves [56]. The committee will enable a concerted stakeholder approach to the study, aimed at coconstructing [56] decentralized management strategies based on a real-life problem identified by the committee. Before starting the PAR cycles, an initial meeting of the steering committee will be held to discuss everyone’s role and involvement [56]. In addition, this meeting will provide an opportunity to contextualize current HCS management and identify a target problem to be addressed in this study. Committee members will be invited to comment on the proposed research process [56]. Members of the research team on the steering committee will play a facilitating role and support the other members in the effective search for solutions [56].

 Cycle 1: Identify Decentralized Management Strategies (Objective 1) Observation Phase: Data Collection

A convenience sample of 24 participants will be recruited to form 4 focus groups of 6 participants each (managers, professionals, seniors, and informal caregivers) to collect data [60]. Each group will be homogeneous to encourage participants to express themselves freely [61]. The qualitative research literature recommends having 6-8 participants in each focus group to ensure interesting exchanges and the opportunity for each participant to answer questions and share their point of view and experience [60]. These focus groups will be used to gather views on decentralized management strategies and the factors influencing their integration as identified in the literature, according to their different status (manager, professional, senior, or informal caregiver) [62]. A member of the steering committee will be present during the discussions to assist the research team. Focus group meetings will last 90 minutes [62]. The aim will be to identify decentralization strategies to solve the target problem. Focus group interviews will be recorded and conducted with the help of a guide [60]. In addition, the student researcher (VS) will document her reflections and the different stages of the study in a research journal [63].

 Reflection Phase: Data Analysis

First, an initial list of potential codes will be drawn up from the literature review on decentralized management strategies (objective 1), for example, establishing clear policies [64]. Second, initial deductive codes will be generated by identifying the units of meaning linked to a list of codes based on the literature review. The emergent initial codes will be generated by identifying the units of meaning in the data relating to decentralized management strategies that are not included in the list of codes (objective 1). Third, to search for themes, codes will be selected to create potential themes. Relevant coded data extracts will be collected for the created themes [64]. To ensure that the themes and subthemes are meaning-based interpretative stories [65], each will have a definition based on the extracted codes. Fourth, the themes will be examined in relation to the coded data extracts and the data as a whole [64]. Themes and subthemes will be organized in a chart to think creatively and reflexively the data and facilitate communication with steering committee members [56,65]. Fifth, the themes, subthemes, and overall chart will be revised and defined [61]. Sixth, relevant and illustrative data extracts will be selected to represent the themes [64]. The 6 steps of the Braun and Clarke's [65] analysis will be carried out by the student researcher (VS) and validated by 2 members of the research team (AC and JQ). Seventh, a meeting will be held with steering committee members to validate and enrich these analyses. The validation will enable us to make sure that the themes that have been created represent the perspective of field stakeholders [65]. The chart resulting from the data analysis will be presented to the steering committee and will help members reflect on the solutions and decentralized management strategies to be integrated.

 Action Phase: Identify and Coconstruct Decentralized Management Strategies

During this phase, the results of the reflection phase will be shared with all HCS stakeholders involved in the strategies identified (ie, professionals on the HCS team). These stakeholders will be identified by the steering committee. A meeting will be held with these stakeholders led by the student researcher (VS) and a member of the steering committee. First, the student researcher will present the decentralized management strategies. Then she will invite the stakeholders to prioritize the strategies according to 3 criteria: strategy’s relevance to the problem identified, strategy’s feasibility in terms of accessibility of the necessary resources, and strategy’s acceptability to all stakeholders (managers, professionals, seniors, and informal caregivers) [66]. Finally, a plan of decentralized management strategies will be drawn up with the stakeholders [56,67]. This will identify the decentralized management strategies to be prioritized, the associated tasks, the resources needed, and the time required [56].

 Cycle 2: Identify Factors Influencing the Integration of Decentralized Management Strategies (Objective 2) Observation Phase: Data Collection

With the same 24 participants, meetings of 4 homogeneous focus groups of 6 participants each (managers, professionals, seniors, and informal caregivers), lasting 90 minutes [62], will be conducted. In the second cycle, the focus groups will be used to anticipate and coconstruct factors that could potentially influence the integration of decentralized management strategies in HCS.

 Reflection Phase: Data Analysis

A thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke’s 6 steps [64] will be conducted to interpret the data collected and will be carried out in the same way as in the first cycle. Both deductive and inductive approaches will be used to define an initial list of potential factor codes based on the literature and to allow new themes to emerge [64]. The analysis will generate a chart of factors linked to the decentralized management strategies identified in the first cycle. A steering committee meeting will then be held to present the chart and validate the factors involved in integrating decentralized management strategies [56].

 Action Phase: Describe the Factors Influencing Integration of the Strategies

In the second cycle, the action phase will consist of a meeting with the same stakeholders as in the first cycle. This meeting will provide an opportunity to share the factors (facilitators and obstacles) identified and to reflect on those most likely to influence the integration of the decentralized management strategies identified in the first cycle. This discussion will lead stakeholders to consolidate the plan of decentralized management strategies and anticipate their integration [56,67]. Thus, at the end of the 2 cycles, the data collected should enable empirical saturation to be reached, with further collection no longer providing sufficiently new or different information to justify another PAR cycle [68].

 Modeling Stage

The PAR process will end with a fourth meeting of the steering committee. At this meeting, the results (decentralized management strategy plan and factor figures) will be integrated into a model coconstructed by the steering committee [56,67]. Based on this model, the decentralized management strategy plan will be converted into recommendations regarding which strategies to prioritize to resolve the management issues identified.

 Recruitment and Sampling

The participants will be main HCS stakeholders: managers, professionals, seniors, and informal caregivers. They will be recruited with the help of steering committee members, who will explain the research project to them and verify their interest in participating. Convenience sampling will then be used to target a total of 6 managers, 6 professionals, 6 seniors, and 6 informal caregivers (n=24) [64]. Participants will be recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) they must have received services or worked in HCS for a continuous period of at least 6 months; (2) they must have an interest in HCS management; (3) they must be able to express themselves in French; and (4) they must be able to consent to participate in the study. They will participate in the observation phase in both cycles.

 Ethical Considerations

This study was approved by the research ethics board of the integrated university health and social services center (#2024-5221/Carrier). All participants will be required to provide free and informed written consent for each cycle. Participants will be able to withdraw from the study at any time without any repercussions. They will also be informed of the confidential nature of the data collected and the procedures followed to ensure confidentiality and anonymity. The data collected will be secured (on a password-protected computer or in a locked fireproof filing cabinet at the Research Centre on Aging) and only the research team will have access to them. Members of the steering committee will fill out a collaboration protocol, based on the one developed by Fortier et al [69]. As a PAR, the impact of change on participants must be considered. The study, which is conducted in partnership with the participants [61], who are treated with respect throughout the research process, cannot be used to evaluate their work [61]. Seniors and informal caregivers will receive financial compensation of CAD $25 (US $17.67) for their transportation to a point of service offering HCS.

 Results

The study started in February 2024 and will be carried out according to an optimal schedule over a 1½ period (Table 1). In the preliminary stage, we obtained ethical approval and developed the interview guides. We also developed a research partnership with an HCS site. Initially, one meeting of the steering committee was planned. However, 2 additional meetings were necessary to contextualize the management and organization of the HCS site. The first cycle began in July, with the first focus group in July 2024. We had recruited 12 managers and 7 home care workers. We are currently at the stage of conducting focus groups with seniors and caregivers. Each cycle will last approximately 4 months. To ensure knowledge mobilization, the research team will prepare scientific papers and make presentations. Members of the steering committee will be invited to participate. This study received financial support (June 2023) from a major Canadian funding body, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (#430-2023-00783/Carrier).

Tasks and timeline for each cycle of the participatory action research.

Task Time
Preliminary stage
Ethics approval December 2023a
Development of interview guides December 2023a
Development of research partnership February 2024a
First meeting of steering committee March 2024a
Second and third meetings to contextualized HCSb June-July 2024a
First cycle
Focus group July-October 2024a
Thematic analyses November-December 2024a
Fourth (initially second) meeting of steering committee December 2024a
Meeting with local stakeholders January 2025
Second cycle
Focus group January 2025
Thematic analyses February-March 2025
Fifth (initially third) meeting of steering committee March 2024
Meeting with local stakeholders April 2025
Modeling stage
Sixth (initially fourth) meeting of steering committee April 2025
Dissemination and mobilization strategies June-October 2025

aTasks completed at the time of publication of this paper.

bHCS: home care services.

 Discussion Strengths and Limitations

This study is designed to explore decentralized management strategies that are concrete and adapted to the realities of local stakeholders as well as to anticipate factors involved in integrating the strategies. The methodological choices are scientifically rigorous and will be validated in each phase of the study by members of the steering committee [68,70]. To encourage greater reflexivity on the part of the student researcher (VS), the focus group interviews will be cocoded with at least 1 member of the research team, and the analyses will be validated by the steering committee. The research team’s experience in the health care system is an asset as they are familiar with the management context [61,68,70]. However, decentralized management strategies will be developed in a centralized management context, which could present an obstacle to the integration of some strategies. In addition, given the power relationship between managers and professionals, social desirability is a potential bias. Nonetheless, the views of various local stakeholders will enrich the steering committee’s discussions [56]. In addition, the research team members will play a facilitating role and support other members in effectively identifying decentralized management strategies and the factors involved [56]. The research team will pay attention to power issues during discussions to ensure that all members can express themselves freely [56].

 Broad Implications

The research project will address a gap in the literature by identifying concrete decentralized management strategies adapted to the local reality of an HCS site and anticipating factors involved in integrating these strategies. The results will advance practical knowledge regarding decentralized management, which can serve as a basis for further studies designed to advance knowledge in this field.

This study will provide recommendations for innovative solutions to a management issue identified by an HCS site. It considers the main stakeholders in HCS in the search for innovative solutions and helps identify decentralized management strategies that meet the needs of the institution. The strategies identified can also be adapted to other environments with similar characteristics [71]. Knowledge of decentralized management will be transferred between participants and members of the steering committee [58]. In addition, this project will increase the self-determination of steering committee members through the PAR process, which will encourage them to get involved in the search for strategies [58]. By involving seniors and informal caregivers in the steering committee and focus groups, this study encourages community participation in the search for management strategies. As a result, the decentralized management strategies identified will undoubtedly meet seniors’ needs [72].

 Abbreviations HCS

home care services

 NPM

new public management

 PAR

participatory action research

Financial support for this study is provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC; grant 430-2023-00783). AC is a Fonds de recherche du Québec—Santé Junior 1 researcher (#296437).

None declared.

 Lapuente V Van de Walle S The effects of new public management on the quality of public services Governance 2020 33 3 461 475 10.1111/gove.12502 Couturier Y Gagnon D Belzile L The new public management in health and social services and the emergence of case management Éducation et sociétés 2013 2 3 109 122 Grenier J St-Jérôme C Défis pour les travailleuses sociales?: participer au renouvellement des pratiques sociales dans un contexte de performance au travail [Challenges for social workers: participating in the renewal of social practices in a context of work performance] Revue Intervention 2018 2024-01-29 https://tinyurl.com/bdhebcb2 Parazelli M Ruelland I Autorité et gestion de l'intervention sociale: entre servitude et acte pouvoir [Authority and management of social intervention: between servitude and act of power] 2017 Quebec Presses de l’Université du Québec Fournier PL Moisan L Lagacé D Landry S Le cadre intermédiaire, un pilier fragilisé du système de santé et de services sociaux [The mid-level manager: a weakened pillar of the health and social services system] Gestion 2021 46 1 88 92 10.3917/riges.461.0088 Marchildon GP Allin S Merkur S Canada: health system review Health Syst Transit 2020 22 3 1 194 33527903 Quebec Publications Act respecting local health and social services network development agencies, Bill 25 (CS, c. 21) 2024-01-29 https://www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/document/cs/A-8.1?etcible= Quebec Publications Act to modify the organization and governance of the health and social services network, in particular by abolishing the regional agencies 2024-01-29 https://www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/document/cs/O-7.2 Grenier J Marchand I Bourque M Les services de soutien à domicile au Québec: une analyse des réformes [Home care services in Quebec: an analysis of reforms] (1980-2020) Nouvelles pratiques sociales 2021 32 1 26 46 10.7202/1080868ar Lavoie-Moore M Trois problèmes essentiels auxquels la réforme Dubé ne s?attaquera pas [Three key problems not addressed by the Dubé reform] Institut de recherche et d?informations socioéconomiques 2023 2024-01-29 https://iris-recherche.qc.ca/blogue/sante-et-services-sociaux/reforme-dube-trois-problemes/ Plourde A Réforme Dubé | Santé Québec : une agence pour gérer le système de santé comme une usine d’automobiles [Dubé and Santé Québec reform: an agency to manage the healthcare system like a car factory] Institut de recherche et d?informations socioéconomiques 2023 2024-01-29 https://iris-recherche.qc.ca/blogue/sante/reforme-sante-usine-automobile/ Ouellet A Tribune L Comprendre et repenser le système de santé pour les aînés... et les futurs aînés [Understanding and rethinking the healthcare system for seniors...and future seniors] 2024-01-29 https://www.latribune.ca/actualites/politique/2023/04/22/comprendre-et-repenser-le-systeme-de-sante-pour-les-aines-et-les-futurs-aines-J3BGZ3BVYJH4TE6MHATH4XCC6Q/ Assemblée NDQ Bill 15, Loi visant à rendre le système de santé et de services sociaux plus efficace [Bill 15, An Act to make the health and social services system more efficient] 2023. Projet de loi n° 15, Loi visant à rendre le système de santé et de services sociaux plus efficace - Assemblée nationale du Québec (assnat.qc.ca) 2023 2024-01-29 https://www.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/Fichiers_client/lois_et_reglements/LoisAnnuelles/fr/2023/2023C34F.PDF Grenier J Bourque M St-Amour N La souffrance psychique au travail : une affaire de gestion? [Mental suffering at work: a management issue?] La souffrance psychique au travail: une affaire de gestion? Intervention 2016 144 9 20 Benoît M Perron L Lévesque G Aux Premières Lignes du soutien à domicile: Une enquête auprès de 697 travailleuses du programme de soutien à l'autonomie des personnes âgées à travers le Québec [On the front lines of home care: A survey of 697 workers in the support program for the autonomy of the elderly across Québec] 2021 2024-12-13 Montréal Université du Québec à Montréal https://etat21.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Aux-premieres-ligne-du-SAD.pdf Johnson S Bacsu J Abeykoon H McIntosh T Jeffery B Novik N No place like home: a systematic review of home care for older adults in Canada Can J Aging 2018 37 4 400 419 10.1017/S0714980818000375 30176954 S0714980818000375 Carrier A « Performance » et pratique professionnelle dans les services de soutien à domicile offerts aux aînés : effets et actions possibles pour assurer un développement durable [“Performance” and professional practice in homecare services for seniors: Effects and possible actions for sustainable development] Phronesis 2021 10 4 156 178 10.7202/1083982ar Morin EM Gagné C Cherré B Making work meaningful: promoting psychological well-being Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail 2009 2024-01-29 https://www.irsst.qc.ca/media/documents/PubIRSST/R-644.pdf?v=2024-02-15 Bourque M Grenier J Quesnel-Vallee A St-Louis M Seery A St-Germain L Transformation et perceptions d'acteurs: la réforme de la santé et des services sociaux de 2015 L'accessibilité, la continuité et la qualité des services auprès des usagers et des usagères des programmes de soutien aux personnes âgées (SAPA) en CHSLD et à domicile [Accessibility, continuity and quality of services for users of support programs for the elderly] 2019 2024-12-13 CSSS Lucille-Teasdale https://www.comiteusagerslucilleteasdale.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/rapp-cssslt_-final-15octobre-2019.pdf Protecteur DC Rapport annuel d'activités 2018-2019 [Annual activity report 2018-2019] Protecteur du citoyen 2019 2024-01-29 https://protecteurducitoyen.qc.ca/fr/enquetes/rapports-annuels/2018-2019 Hébert R Les soins et les services aux personnes âgées au Québec [Care and services for the elderly in Quebec] Journal du droit de la santé et de l?assurance-maladie 2022 31 62 68 10.3917/jdsam.221.0062 Brinkerhoff DW Johnson RW La décentralisation de la gouvernance locale dans les États fragiles: les enseignements tirés du cas irakien [Decentralizing local governance in fragile states: lessons from the case of Irak] RISA (Revue internationale des sciences administratives) 2009 75 643 668 10.3917/risa.754.0643 Terlizzi A Health system decentralization and recentralization in Italy: Ideas, discourse, and institutions Soc Policy Adm 2018 53 7 974 988 10.1111/spol.12458 Ohrling M Øvretveit John Brommels M Can management decentralisation resolve challenges faced by healthcare service delivery organisations? Findings for managers and researchers from a scoping review Int J Health Plann Manage 2021 36 1 30 41 10.1002/hpm.3058 32862493 Commissaire Bien vieillir chez soi tome 3 : Poser un diagnostic pour agir : degré de mise en œuvre de la Politique de SAD de 2003 au Québec [Ageing Well at Home Volume 3: Diagnosis for Action: The Degree of Implementation of the 2003 Home Care Policy in Quebec] Commissaire à la santé et au bien-être 2023 2025-01-15 https://www.csbe.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/www/2023/Rapportpreliminaire_SAD/CSBE-Rapport_Soutien_Domicile_Tome3.pdf Jarvis T Smith R Sandhu HS Mac-Seing M O'Neill M Rosella L Allin S Pinto AD Promise and peril: how health system reforms impacted public health in three Canadian provinces Can J Public Health 2023 114 5 714 725 10.17269/s41997-023-00785-2 37410363 10.17269/s41997-023-00785-2 PMC10484823 Bien vieillir chez soi -Tome 3: poser un diagnostic pour agir Commissaire à La Santé et au Bien-être 2023 2024-01-29 https://www.csbe.gouv.qc.ca/publication/bien-vieillir-chez-soi-tome-3-poser-diagnostic.html Castonguay J Bourassa Forcier M Lemay A Denis JL Le devoir de faire autrement, Partie 2: Réorienter la gouvernance vers des résultats qui comptent pour les gens [The need to do things differently, Part 2: Reorienting governance towards results that matter to people] Commissaire à la santé et au bien-être 2019 2024-01-29 https://www.csbe.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/www/2022/Rapportfinal_Mandat/CSBE-Rapport_final_Partie2.pdf Gouvernement DQ Plan pour mettre en œuvre les changements nécessaires en santé [Plan to implement the necessary changes in healthcare] Gouvernement du Québec 2022 2024-01-29 https://www.quebec.ca/gouvernement/politiques-orientations/plan-changements-sante Savoie D Une gouvernance renouvelée du réseau de la santé et des services sociaux [Renewed governance of the health and social services organization]. 2022. URL: Une gouvernance renouvelée du réseau de la santé et des services sociaux - Constats et recommandations Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux 2024-01-29 https://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/msss/fichiers/2022/22-210-21W.pdf Mills A Vaughan JP Smith DL Tabibzadeh I Health System Decentralization: Concepts, Issues and Country Experience 1990 2024-01-29 World Health Organization https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/39053 Sreeramareddy CT Sathyanarayana T Decentralised versus centralised governance of health services Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019 9 10.1002/14651858.cd010830.pub2 Ohrling M Solberg Carlsson K Brommels M No man is an island: management of the emergency response to the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) outbreak in a large public decentralised service delivery organisation BMC Health Serv Res 2022 22 1 371 10.1186/s12913-022-07716-w 35313891 10.1186/s12913-022-07716-w PMC8935606 Bossert T Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: decision space, innovation and performance Soc Sci Med 1998 47 10 1513 1527 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00234-2 9823047 S0277953698002342 Sakyi EK Awoonor-Williams J Adzei FA Barriers to implementing health sector administrative decentralisation in Ghana: a study of the Nkwanta district health management team J Health Organ Manag 2011 25 4 400 419 10.1108/14777261111155038 22039660 Sumah AM Baatiema L Decentralisation and management of human resource for health in the health system of Ghana: a decision space analysis Int J Health Policy Manag 2019 8 1 28 39 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.88 30709100 PMC6358646 Men B Grundy J Cane J Rasmey LC An NS Soeung SC Jenkinson K Boreland M Maynard J Biggs BA Key issues relating to decentralization at the provincial level of health management in Cambodia Int J Health Plann Manage 2005 20 1 3 19 10.1002/hpm.793 15799454 Maluka SO Bukagile G Community participation in the decentralised district health systems in Tanzania: why do some health committees perform better than others? Int J Health Plann Manage 2016 31 2 E86 E104 10.1002/hpm.2299 26044888 Schneider H Nxumalo N Leadership and governance of community health worker programmes at scale: a cross case analysis of provincial implementation in South Africa Int J Equity Health 2017 16 1 72 10.1186/s12939-017-0565-3 28911324 10.1186/s12939-017-0565-3 PMC5599898 Abimbola S Baatiema L Bigdeli M The impacts of decentralization on health system equity, efficiency and resilience: a realist synthesis of the evidence Health Policy Plan 2019 34 8 605 617 10.1093/heapol/czz055 31378811 5543691 PMC6794566 Mannion R Goddard M Kuhn M Bate A Decentralization strategies and provider incentives in healthcare: evidence from the English National Health Service Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2005 4 1 47 54 10.2165/00148365-200504010-00007 16076238 417 Wholey DR Gregg W Moscovice I Public health systems: a social networks perspective Health Serv Res 2009 44 5 Pt 2 1842 1862 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01011.x 19686252 HESR1011 PMC2758409 McInnes E Middleton S Gardner G Haines M Haertsch M Paul CL Castaldi P A qualitative study of stakeholder views of the conditions for and outcomes of successful clinical networks BMC Health Serv Res 2012 12 1 49 10.1186/1472-6963-12-49 22373078 1472-6963-12-49 PMC3325167 Regmi K Naidoo J Pilkington P Greer A Decentralization and district health services in Nepal: understanding the views of service users and service providers J Public Health (Oxf) 2010 32 3 406 417 10.1093/pubmed/fdp116 19995811 fdp116 Antón JI Muñoz de Bustillo R Fernández Macías E Rivera J Effects of health care decentralization in Spain from a citizens' perspective Eur J Health Econ 2014 15 4 411 431 10.1007/s10198-013-0485-0 23660932 Liwanag HJ Wyss K What conditions enable decentralization to improve the health system? Qualitative analysis of perspectives on decision space after 25 years of devolution in the philippines PLoS One 2018 13 11 e0206809 10.1371/journal.pone.0206809 30395625 PONE-D-18-07254 PMC6218067 Regmi K Methodological and practical viewpoints of qualitative-driven mixed method design: the case of decentralisation of primary healthcare services in Nepal Prim Health Care Res Dev 2018 19 1 64 76 10.1017/S1463423617000597 28889831 S1463423617000597 PMC6452975 Zhang H van Doorslaer E Xu L Zhang Y van de Klundert J Can a results-based bottom-up reform improve health system performance? Evidence from the rural health project in China Health Econ 2019 28 10 1204 1219 10.1002/hec.3935 31368190 Nyikuri M Tsofa B Barasa E Okoth P Molyneux S Crises and resilience at the frontline-public health facility managers under devolution in a sub-county on the Kenyan coast PLoS One 2015 10 12 e0144768 10.1371/journal.pone.0144768 26696096 PONE-D-15-25063 PMC4687913 Bossert TJ Mitchell AD Health sector decentralization and local decision-making: decision space, institutional capacities and accountability in Pakistan Soc Sci Med 2011 72 1 39 48 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.019 21134705 S0277-9536(10)00755-0 Nyikuri MM Tsofa B Okoth P Barasa EW Molyneux S "We are toothless and hanging, but optimistic": sub county managers' experiences of rapid devolution in coastal Kenya Int J Equity Health 2017 16 1 113 10.1186/s12939-017-0607-x 28911332 10.1186/s12939-017-0607-x PMC5599878 Martin-Fernandez J Gomez-Gascon T Beamud-Lagos M Cortes-Rubio J Alberquilla-Menendez-Asenjo A Professional quality of life and organizational changes: a five-year observational study in primary care BMC Health Serv Res 2007 7 101 10.1186/1472-6963-7-101 17610728 1472-6963-7-101 PMC1933419 Ohrling M Tolf S Solberg-Carlsson K Brommels M That's how it should work: the perceptions of a senior management on the value of decentralisation in a service delivery organisation J Health Organ Manage 2021 35 5 596 613 10.1108/jhom-12-2020-0474 Cobos Muñoz D Merino Amador P Monzon Llamas L Martinez Hernandez D Santos Sancho JM Decentralization of health systems in low and middle income countries: a systematic review Int J Public Health 2017 62 2 219 229 10.1007/s00038-016-0872-2 27572495 10.1007/s00038-016-0872-2 Quebec Publications Act respecting health services and social services (CS, chapter s-4.2) 2003 01 30 2024-12-04 https://www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/document/cs/S-4.2/20030130#:~:text=1.,groups%20to%20which%20they%20belong Stringer ET Ortiz Aragón A Action Research 2021 Los Angeles Sage Publications Roy M Prévost P La recherche-action : origines, caractéristiques et implications de son utilisation dans les sciences de la gestion Recherches qualitatives 2013 32 2 129 151 10.7202/1084625ar Camden C Poncet F Recherche-action participative: nouvelles perspectives Guide Pratique De Recherche en Réadaptation 2014 Louvain-la-Neuve De Boeck Supérieur 383 422 Reason P Bradbury H Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice 2001 Washington, DC Sage Publications Krueger RA Casey MA Focus Group: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th edition 2015 Washington DC Sage Publications Becker AB Israel BA Gustat J Reyes AG Allen AJ Israel BA Eng E Schulz AJ Parker EA Strategies techniques for effective group process in community-based participatory research partnerships Methods in Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. 2nd edition 2012 San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass 69 96 Katz-Buonincontro J How to Interview and Conduct Focus Groups 2022 Washington, DC American Psychological Association Creswell JW Poth CN Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design 2012 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications Braun V Clarke V Using thematic analysis in psychology Qual Res Psychol 2006 3 2 77 101 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Braun V Clarke V Toward good practice in thematic analysis: avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher Int J Transgend Health 2023 24 1 1 6 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597 36713144 2129597 PMC9879167 Whittington R Regner P Angwin D Johnson G Scholes K Exploring Strategy, 12th Edition 2019 France Pearson Stringer E Grenat W Action Research in Health 2004 London, England Pearson Laperrière A Les critères de scientificité des méthodes qualitatives [Criteria for qualitative methods to be scientific. In : Qualitative research: Epistemological and methodological issues] Les Critères de Scientificité des Méthodes Qualitatives 1997 Montreal Morin, G Fortier J Carbonneau H Levasseur M Sévigny A Éthier S Dumont S Castonguay J Fortier M Turcotte PL Protocole de partenariat La Participation Sociale des Aînés: des Savoirs à L'action [Seniors' social participation: from knowledge to action] 2015 10.1515/9782763732596-023 Morse JM Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry Qual Health Res 2015 25 9 1212 1222 10.1177/1049732315588501 26184336 1049732315588501 Lincoln YS Guba EG Naturalistic Inquiry 1985 Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications Crane P O'Regan M Using Participatory Action Research to Improve Early Intervention 2010 Australia Australian Government, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affair