RefCheck Maintenance Notice

On Monday, December 3, 2018, from 16:00-18:00 EST, RefCheck will be undergoing maintenance. RefCheck is the process where, during copyediting, all references are extracted from the manuscript file, parsed, matched against various databases (eg, PubMed and CrossRef), and automatically corrected. For more information on RefCheck, please visit our Knowledge Base.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 23.10.17 in Vol 6, No 10 (2017): October

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Protocol

    Impact of an Electronic Monitoring Intervention to Improve Adherence to Inhaled Medication in Patients with Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

    1University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland

    2Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    3Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Corresponding Author:

    Claudia Gregoriano, MSc

    University Clinic of Medicine

    Cantonal Hospital Baselland

    Rheinstrasse 26

    Liestal, 4410

    Switzerland

    Phone: 41 61 925 37 65

    Fax:41 61 925 28 83

    Email:


    ABSTRACT

    Background: Despite progress in pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment in recent years, the burden of disease among patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is high and patients are frequently hospitalized due to exacerbations. Reasons for uncontrolled diseases are manifold, but are often associated with poor inhalation technique and non-adherence to the prescribed treatment plan. This causes substantial mortality, morbidity, and costs to the healthcare system. In this respect, the study of causes for non-adherence and the development of measures to increase and maintain treatment adherence in chronic diseases is of major clinical importance.

    Objective: The primary objective of this study is to investigate the impact of using specific, validated electronic devices on adherence to inhaled medication in patients with chronic obstructive lung diseases such as asthma and COPD. Furthermore, it aims to assess the impact of a reminder and close supervision of the course of disease and quality of life.

    Methods: In this ongoing prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study, adherence to inhaled medication is analyzed over a 6-month period in at least 154 in- and outpatients with asthma or COPD who have experienced at least 1 exacerbation during the last year. Adherence is measured using electronic data capture devices, which save the date and time of each inhalative device actuation and transfer these data daily via a wireless connection to a Web-based database. Patients are randomly assigned to either the intervention or the control group. The clinical intervention consists of an automated and personal reminder. The intervention group receives an audio reminder and support calls in case medication has not been taken as prescribed or if rescue medication is used more frequently than pre-specified in the study protocol. During the study, participants are assessed every 2 months in the form of clinical visits.

    Results: Recruitment started in January 2014. To date, a total of 169 patients have been recruited. Follow-up assessments are still ongoing. The study will be concluded in the first quarter of 2017. Data analysis will take place during 2017.

    Conclusions: Few studies have investigated medication adherence in patients with chronic obstructive lung diseases. With this prospective study design and the use of state-of-the-art devices for measuring adherence, we expect scientifically relevant and clinically meaningful results that will have a substantial and positive impact on the provision of healthcare in chronically ill patients suffering from asthma or COPD.

    Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02386722; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02386722 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6oJq1fel0)

    JMIR Res Protoc 2017;6(10):e204

    doi:10.2196/resprot.7522

    KEYWORDS

    Crowdfunding campaign to support this specific research

    We help JMIR researchers to raise funds to pursue their research and development aimed at tackling important health and technology challenges. If you would like to show your support for this author, please donate using the button below. The funds raised will directly benefit the corresponding author of this article (minus 8% admin fees). Your donations will help this author to continue publishing open access papers in JMIR journals. Donations of over $100 may also be acknowledged in future publications.

    keyboard with crowdfunding key instead of enter key

    Suggested contribution levels: $20/$50/$100



    Introduction

    Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are highly prevalent lung diseases requiring daily and often lifelong use of inhaled medication [1]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), COPD currently represents the fourth leading cause of death worldwide and is predicted to become the third leading cause of death by 2030 [2]. The prevalence of COPD is increasing due to continuing exposure to COPD risk factors (e.g. tobacco smoke or air pollution) and the continuously aging world population) [3]. The prevalence of asthma is increasing as well [4]. In Swiss adults, the prevalence of asthma and COPD was found to be around 7% and 7% to 9%, respectively [5,6].

    Treatment and Disease Control

    Despite progress in pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment in recent years, the burden of disease imposed by asthma and COPD remains high and patients may be frequently hospitalized due to exacerbation. Based on data from the Swiss COPD Cohort Study, COPD exacerbation rates are high at 23% per year [7]. Acute exacerbations are a risk factor for disease progression and are associated with increased mortality [8]. A survey published by Leuppi et al showed that the level of asthma control in Switzerland is very low with 15% of the investigated patients [9]. This has also been confirmed by a cross-sectional survey by Miedinger et al who found controlled asthma in 27% of all patients according to the international Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines [10]. However, good adherence to therapy can increase the likelihood of achieving better disease control [11].

    Reasons for insufficient disease control in asthma and COPD patients are manifold. They are frequently associated with poor inhalation technique and non-adherence to prescribed treatment plans, which may influence mortality and morbidity and pose a financial burden on healthcare systems [12].

    Medication Adherence

    According to the WHO, adherence is defined as “the extent to which a person’s behavior (including medication-taking) corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider” [13]. Adherence represents the basis for effective drug therapy and complete disease control. It is a multidimensional issue with several influencing factors. The WHO classifies these factors into 5 dimensions: socioeconomic-related factors, healthcare team and system-related factors, condition-related factors, therapy-related factors, and patient-related factors [13]. Furthermore, 2 different patterns of non-adherence behaviors are observed in patients, namely intentional and unintentional non-adherence. Intentional non-adherence describes the deliberate discontinuation or reduction of the intake of medication in case of absence of symptoms [14], which may be due to a lack of understanding of the disease course and treatment aims. In addition, the occurrence of side effects can also lead to intentional non-adherence. Unintentional non-adherence, however, is observed when patients do not follow treatment plans due to reasons out of their control, such as forgetfulness, cognitive impairment, or physical disability [15]. In patients taking inhaled medication, impaired vision or musculoskeletal disorders can affect their ability to use the inhaler devices correctly [16]. Other reasons for unintentional non-adherence are complex medication regimes, poly-pharmacy, and the use of multiple inhalers [17,18]. Non-adherence not only leads to suboptimal treatment of individual patients, but may also cause disease prolongation and increased hospital readmission. Finally, it can increase costs for the healthcare system [19].

    Based on a systematic literature review of medication adherence literature, Vrijens et al proposed a new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medication [20]. The Ascertaining Barriers to Compliance (ABC) taxonomy considers a sequence of events that have to occur for a patient to achieve an optimal benefit from their prescribed treatment regimen and to minimize the risk of harm. This process is divided into 3 essential components: initiation, implementation, and persistence. The process starts with initiation characterized by the intake of the first dose of a prescribed medication. It continues with implementation of the dosing regimen, which is defined as the extent to which a patient’s actual dosing corresponds to the prescribed medication during the time period from initiation to the last dose taken. The last step of the process is persistence, which refers to the time from initiation to eventual discontinuation. After discontinuation, a period of non-persistence may follow until the end of the prescription period.

    As such, non-adherence to medications can occur in the following situations: late or non-initiation of a prescribed treatment, suboptimal implementation of the dosing regimen, or early discontinuation of the treatment. This classification is particularly helpful in framing focused research questions as well as finding measures and data to answer them.

    Adherence to long-term therapy is estimated to be around 50%, as shown in a systematic review summarizing the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It investigated interventions in order to help patients follow prescriptions for medications [21]. Among patients with asthma, rates of non-adherence ranged from 30% to 70% [22]. Levels of non-adherence are comparably high in patients with COPD, ranging from 43% to 58% [23,24]. Adherence to medication can be measured using direct or indirect methods. Direct methods encompass direct observation of drug intake or measurement of drug concentration, such as markers in the blood, urine, or other body fluids. Indirect methods include assessment of a patient’s clinical response, pill count, rates of refilling prescriptions, patients’ self-report, or the use of electronic monitoring devices [25,26]. While none of these methods are currently considered the gold standard for measuring adherence to medications [27,28], the emerging method of choice is electronic monitoring devices [29].

    Self-reporting by patients was shown to be the most cost-effective approach to the assessment of adherence in clinical and research settings [30]. However, being a subjective method, it also bears the highest risk of overestimating adherence compared to electronic measurements [31].

    Observational retrospective studies based on dispensing data from pharmacy record databases analyzed refill adherence for different inhaled medication in patients with asthma and COPD [32-34]. The importance of refill adherence is limited, since this measurement cannot assess the timing of the ingested or inhaled doses that depend on the duration of drug action, which in turn has an important impact on the efficacy of treatment [35].

    To investigate the variability in timing and medication adherence, measurements of dose and timing are necessary, which can be done with electronic medication monitors. Electronic monitoring provides precise data on timing and the pattern of inhaler actuation. In addition, it may detect multiple successive actuations (dumping) [36].

    Electronic monitoring methods such as SmartInhaler devices (Adherium Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) are non-invasive and represent one of the best ways to detect adherence patterns when using additional tools attached on the inhaler devices [37]. SmartInhaler devices have been validated for the assessment of adherence to inhaled medication on a daily basis [38]. They are able to track the time and date of each actuation of the inhaler device (incorporated switch activates by depression or rotation of the device) and transmit the data via a wireless connection to a secure Web database [38]. SmartInhaler devices have been used in several studies measuring adherence to inhaled medication [39,40]. In a study on patients with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids, the integrated audio-visual reminder function of these devices significantly improved adherence to inhaled medication [41].

    Adherence to orally administered drugs or inhaled medications available, such as powder capsules, can be measured by applying a novel technology called Polymedication Electronic Monitoring System (POEMS). This technology is composed of a printed, self-adhesive polymer film carrying loops of conductive wires that can be affixed to multidose punch cards (Pharmis GmbH, Beinwil am See, Switzerland) with 28 cavities. Every time a powder capsule is taken out of the blister, a loop is broken leading to changes in electrical resistance that can be measured and recorded with date and time [42]. The reports generated by SmartInhalers and POEMS detect whether the patients have taken the medication at the right time and dose.

    Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence

    Maintenance of sufficient adherence to the prescribed medication is a critical factor in achieving therapeutic success, particularly in chronic diseases. Haynes et al [43] reviewed randomized controlled intervention trials to improve adherence to pharmacological regimens in patients with chronic diseases, including asthma. Both adherence and clinical outcomes were measured in these studies. The authors found that less than 50% of the interventions achieved a significant improvement of adherence while only 30% demonstrated an improvement in clinical outcome. The greatest success was attained with complex interventions combining several strategies (information, reminders, self-monitoring, reinforcement, counseling, telephone follow-up, supportive care, etc). [43]. Lu et al [44] showed that disease management interventions are associated with short- and long-term improvements with regards to the process and quality of care; in particular, when using structured, population-based and multidisciplinary approaches for the identification, treatment, and monitoring of patients with chronic illness. This review also suggested that coordinating pharmacist services as a component of the process of care can improve quality of life, medication adherence, and clinical outcomes in chronic patients [44]. However, particularly successful intervention components could not be determined specifically [45].

    Study Objectives

    The objectives of this study are (1) to investigate the impact of using specific, validated electronic devices on adherence to inhaled medication in patients with asthma and COPD; and (2) to assess the effect of an acoustic reminder and close supervision on the course of disease and quality of life.


    Methods

    Participants and Recruitment

    In- and outpatients with a diagnosis of asthma bronchiale or COPD from several hospitals in the Basel region and patients treated by pulmonologists in private practice are screened for eligibility (Table 1). Advertisements are distributed in the form of posters, flyers, as well as on ad-screens (Cantonal Hospital Baselland Liestal and Bruderholz), communicating the most important information about the study. Advertisements are also placed in local newspapers.

    Table 1. Recruitment locations and related recruitment types.
    View this table

    Initially, inclusion and exclusion criteria are checked via telephone, during hospitalizations, or practice visits. Eligible patients are invited for an introductory training course. Before the start of the study, the investigator provides written and verbal information about content and duration of the study. The investigator obtains written consent from patients confirming their willingness to participate in the study.

    Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

    The study inclusion and exclusion criteria for male and female participants are shown in Textbox 1 [46]. Enrolment started January 2014 and will end when at least 154 individuals are included in the study.


    Textbox 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
    View this box

    Study Design and Procedures

    In this prospective, single-blinded RCT, 169 participants are followed for up to 6 months (Figure 1). Prior to study start, patients have to be in a stable phase of their obstructive lung disease. This is defined as an exacerbation-free period of at least 1 month prior to commencement of the study and no current hospitalization for any other medical condition. Study participants will continue to be cared by their usual treating physician(s) who decide on all prescriptions and treatments.

    All participants take part in a training course before the baseline visit, which takes approximately 45 to 60 minutes to complete. The goal of the training course is to provide refresher training on inhalation techniques in order to ensure that all participants are at the same level of disease knowledge and use their medication correctly. The training begins with a brief introduction about asthma and COPD. Afterwards, the most frequently used devices are presented and briefly demonstrated. Correct technique depends on inhaler type and it is important that patients use their own inhaler correctly. Common mistakes and problems associated with the use of the devices are explained. The correct use of the individual devices is demonstrated in a short film (produced by the “Deutsche Atemwegsliga” Bad Lippspringe, Germany) [47], which presents the most important steps to follow in order to achieve an effective inhalation. Notably, it has been shown that the manufacturer’s instruction sheet is not effective enough to achieve correct techniques [48-50]. However, the combination of verbal and visual instructions seems to have a higher success rate in improving the application of inhaler devices [51]. At the end of the training, participants are given the opportunity to ask questions concerning the devices.

    Visits take place at baseline (T0), after 2 (T1), 4 (T2), and 6 months (T3) and will take between 45 to 60 minutes, depending on the patient, regardless of the group they belong to. Each visit includes a spirometry test (EasyOne Pro, ndd Medizintechnik AG, Zurich, Switzerland), measurement of diffusion capacity (EasyOne Pro, ndd Medizintechnik AG, Zurich, Switzerland), and exhaled nitric oxide (NIOX MINO, Aerocrine AB, Sweden) and carbon monoxide (piCO+Smokerlyzer, Bedfont Scientific Ltd., Kent, UK) levels. To detect false device applications, each patient is asked to demonstrate the inhalation technique with all prescribed devices to the investigator by using a placebo device (to avoid overdosing). Moreover, participants have to complete the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) [52], the Asthma Control Test (ACT) [53], the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the Short Form (SF)-36 [54,55] to assess quality of life at baseline, after 2, 4, and 6 months. To investigate patients’ beliefs about the necessity of the prescribed medication as well as their concerns about the potential adverse consequences of taking it, the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) is used at baseline [56,57]. Throughout the 4 visits, information about exacerbations since the last visit are also obtained.

    Figure 1. Study flow chart based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.
    View this figure

    Randomization

    Participants are randomly assigned either to the intervention or to the control group. The intervention group is provided with an acoustic reminder for inhalation and receives support calls when the medication is not taken as prescribed. The control group does not receive further support regarding their adherence. A randomization list with study group allocation is generated using R (RStudio, Boston, US). The randomization procedure is provided in a block size of 2. Therefore, examinations between study groups are sequent. This reduces the risk of a season effect between the 2 study groups. Furthermore, the patients are not aware of which group they have been randomized to (single-blinded).

    Clinical Intervention

    The clinical intervention consists of an automated and personal reminder. Patients assigned to the intervention group receive an audio-reminder, generated by a mobile phone with app capabilities (smartphone). For patients with SmartInhaler, the inhalation times are entered on the Smartinhalerlive website by the investigator. These are then generated by an app directly onto the participant’s mobile phone. For patients using POEMS, the inhalation times are entered by the investigator directly in form of an alarm clock onto the mobile phone. Patients are allowed to choose the inhalation times themselves, depending on their personal habits and daily routine. This allows for times during the workday and weekend to be defined. Since the inhalation actuation does not stop the device alarms, the reminder generated by the SmartInhaler app and those generated by the mobile phone have to be quitted by the patients themselves. Moreover, these patients receive support calls carried out by the pharmacist when the use of rescue medication doubles or if the inhaled medication is not inhaled as prescribed for more than 2 consecutive days. In exceptional cases and in the absence of the pharmacist, the support calls are carried out by the responsible study nurse who has been trained accordingly. Participants also receive feedback from the pharmacist on their adherence at each visit, especially for the results of the POEMS.

    Patients assigned to the control group have no reminder and will receive no further support regarding their adherence to their inhaled medication.

    Sample Size

    Power calculation is based on “time to next exacerbation”. A previous study has shown that 30% of patients with COPD are readmitted within 6 months because of an exacerbation [58]. Exacerbation rate could be reduced by 30% with an educational program [59]. Since our intervention is not only based on an educational program but on close supervision during the study period, we expect a bigger effect of our intervention, resulting in an assumed endpoint reduction of 40% (12/30), with 11% (8/70) of patients experiencing an exacerbation in the intervention group. This corresponds to a hazard ratio (HR; intervention/control) of 0.36, taking into consideration the time-to-event-curve for the primary outcome (time to next exacerbation). Assuming a sample size of 70 participants for each study group, there is a power of 80% to detect a HR of 0.36 based on a 1-tailed test, since only a decrease of the exacerbation risk is of interest and expected. The calculation is based on the assumptions mentioned above and on a 1-tailed test with a significance level of 5%. Furthermore, 14 additional participants (7 for each study group) will be added to account for dropouts. Therefore, a total of 154 participants will be included in this study.

    Measurement of Objective Adherence

    In both groups, adherence is measured using SmartInhalers and POEMS as outlined above. Daily measurements are started after the baseline visit (T0) and are continued until the end of the study (T3). All participants are aware that their adherence is measured during the whole study period using the delivered devices. Hence, a possible “hawthorne effect” can result, which represents a change in patient’s behavior as a consequence of being monitored during a study [60]. However, previous studies showed that there is no better adherence in patients who were informed that their drug intake was being monitored compared to those patients who were unaware of the monitoring [61,62].

    Recorded data are uploaded daily at 00:00 to a Web-based database via a wireless connection. Participants are asked to take their medication at the first visit in order to ensure the correct handling and usage of the SmartInhaler. Once the devices are installed on the inhalers, patients can use their medication as usual.

    Currently, no monitoring devices exist that are specifically developed for monitoring the adherence of the newly introduced inhalation-device Ellipta. To assess adherence in patients undergoing treatment with Ellipta, a SmartInhaler with a placebo-device is handed out and patients are instructed to trigger a puff of the placebo every time when they inhale their active treatment. This procedure allows an indirect recording of date and time actuation of the Ellipta inhaler.

    POEMS are used for inhalation with powder capsules (Breezhaler and HandiHaler). The capsules are pre-filled for the following 2 weeks with a patient’s individualized prescription plan (mostly one time daily inhalation of capsule contents). The multidose punch cards are filled manually by a pharmacist. Participants who apply Breezhaler and HandiHaler will receive 1 multidose punch card for every 2 weeks. Every time the patients break a loop for taking the capsules, the date and time are recorded on a microchip, which can be read out when patients bring back the empty punch card.

    Data Collection and Outcome Measures

    The primary outcome of this study is “time to next asthma or COPD exacerbation”, defined as acute-onset worsening of the patient’s condition beyond day-to-day variations requiring interaction with a health care provider [63]. Outcome is expressed as the number of exacerbations since the last visit with the exact period of exacerbation as well as the number of exacerbations followed by hospitalization. If patients are not able to provide information about the time of exacerbation, the treating physician will be contacted.

    Sociodemographic variables such as gender, civil status, age, educational level, and employment status are obtained by a generic questionnaire during the baseline visit. Furthermore, smoking status is assessed from medical history and expressed as pack years (py; number of smoking years times the number of smoked packs per day). Body height and weight are signified by body mass index (BMI; body weight/[body height]2). In addition, disease-related questions such as allergies, comorbidities, current medication, and number of exacerbations in the previous 12 months are recorded, including hospitalizations and emergency department attendance.

    This project focuses on the implementation of a prescribed dosing regimen. Objective adherence will be analyzed according to the definitions shown in Textbox 2 [64].


    Textbox 2. Objective adherence definitions.
    View this box

    Throughout all visits, the following lung function tests are performed to assess changes in lung function: spirometry (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/ FVC), diffusion capacity, and nitric oxide and carbon monoxide measurements.

    During each visit (T0 to T3), participants are asked to demonstrate how they actually use their device at home to evaluate the inhalation technique. For this purpose, placebo devices are used to prevent overdosing. Correctness of inhaler use is assessed using pre-defined checklists for each inhaler type based on user guidelines and instruction package inserts from the manufacturers [65-70]. Correct inhaler usage is defined as correct performance of every step on the checklist. Incorrect inhaler usage is defined as 1 or more steps done incorrectly. A total score is calculated with 0 (incorrect application) and 1 (correct application) and applied to every step. Possible errors are corrected by verbal instruction and visual demonstration. For ethical reasons the correction was performed in both groups. Patients demonstrate their inhalation technique until it is performed correctly.

    At baseline, the BMQ is used to assess patients’ beliefs about the need of the prescribed medication and their concerns about the potential adverse consequences of taking it.

    Changes in quality of life are investigated at baseline, after 2, 4, and 6 months using different disease-specific questionnaires: SGRQ, CAT, and ACT. To determine general quality of life, the SF-36-questionnaire is used.

    Data collection will end as soon as all study participants have finished the 6-month observational period and have had the fourth clinical visit.

    Statistical Analysis

    Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistic and survival analyses, are carried out using the software R (RStudio, Boston, US) and SPSS (IBM Corporation, Armonk, US). Statistical significance is set at the 5% level. Time to next exacerbation is compared by applying the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. Results will be reported as a HR with a corresponding confidence interval (CI) of 95 % and P values. A HR smaller than 1 is expected. This implies that the intervention group will have a smaller risk for exacerbations. Associations between time to between exacerbation and independent predictors will be analyzed (taking adherence, timing adherence, and gaps without inhalation). Comparisons of secondary parameters are done using t tests or chi-square tests (or their nonparametric equivalents if data are not normally distributed).

    Missing Data and Dropouts

    Patients will be rated as dropout when they are excluded from the study at their own request or if they are no longer able to participate in the study until the final visit. Patients who are not able to undergo all clinical examination during the follow-up visits will remain in the study. Multiple imputation methods will be used to impute missing data with less than 25% missing values. This is typically more efficient than complete case analysis when covariates have missing values [71].

    Ethics and Dissemination

    This study is conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration and according to the good clinical practice guidelines. Study participation is voluntary and can be revoked at any time without specification of reasons and will have no disadvantages for their future medical care. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee Northwest/Central Switzerland (registry number: EK-269/13) and was registered with Clincialtrials.gov (NCT02386722). In case of any considerable deviations from the actual study protocol, the investigator will send an amendment for further approval from the ethical committees. The results of this study will be disseminated via seminar, conference presentations, and academic, peer-reviewed journals.

    Data Security and Disclosure of Original Documents

    Patient data are collected and stored under confidentiality rules. For reports, data collection, and administrative forms an anonymization will be done and participants will be assigned a study identification (ID) (PXXX). All study-related data and documents are stored on a protected server of the Cantonal Hospital Baselland. Data access is limited to members of the medical research group at the Cantonal Hospital Liestal. After study completion, all documents and informed consent forms will be retained in the archives of the University Department of Internal Medicine at the Cantonal Hospital Liestal for 10 years according to applicable Swiss regulatory requirements.


    Results

    This is a single-centre, randomized controlled study. It is performed at the Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, and Bruderholz, Switzerland. Recruitment started in January 2014, and to date, a total of 169 patients have been recruited. Follow-up assessments are still ongoing. The study will be concluded in the first quarter of 2017. Data analysis will take place during 2017.


    Discussion

    To date, only a few studies have investigated medication adherence in patients with chronic obstructive lung diseases. These studies were retrospectively analyzed, limited to refill adherence, and had several important limitations such as the lack of assessment of the relationship between the duration of drug action and the timing of the ingested doses, which impacts the efficacy of treatment [15]. Other disadvantages of this measurement are missing data when refills were obtained outside of the investigated system and incomplete records if the medication plan is verbally modified by the prescriber without informing the dispensing pharmacy. Moreover, assumptions have to be made on medication intake behavior, if it is taken according to the prescription, and corresponds to the prescribed refilling [72].

    We expect that a regular adherence reminder and close supervision by a healthcare professional will have a beneficial effect on adherence to inhaled medication in patients with asthma or COPD, resulting in an increased time to next exacerbation. In addition, we assume that improved adherence will increase the quality of life of these patients.

    With the prospective study design and the use of state-of-the-art devices for measuring adherence, we expect scientifically relevant and clinically meaningful results that will have a substantial and positive impact on the provision of healthcare in chronically ill patients suffering from asthma or COPD.

    Acknowledgments

    Special thanks to the Marketing Department (Cantonal Hospital Baselland and Liestal, Switzerland), Dr A Breitenbücher (pulmonologist, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland), Dr Joos Zellweger (pulmonologist, Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland), Dr S Vogt (pulmonologist, Hospital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland), Dr M Frey (pulmonologist, Clinic Barmelweid, Barmelweid, Switzerland), and Dr D Simonett (pulmonologist in private practice, Liestal, Switzerland) for their support in recruiting study participants. The authors also express their gratitude to Anna-Lisa Flamm, Research Nurse, for her continuing contribution to the study and the data collection.

    This project is financially supported by grants from the Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation (Bern, Switzerland), the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMW; Bern, Switzerland), the Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft (FAG; Basel, Switzerland) and the Swiss Lung League (Bern, Switzerland). Further financial support was provided by unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim Switzerland, Astra Zeneca Switzerland, and Mundipharma Switzerland

    The pharmaceutical companies that provided funding for this study have no bearing on the study design, data collection and analysis, or writing of the manuscript.

    Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee Northwest/Central Switzerland (EK-269/13).

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Authors' Contributions

    CG, TD, and JDL are chief investigators of the project. CG, TD, SD, IA, KH, and JDL made contributions to the protocol in their specific areas of expertise. CG prepared the first draft of this manuscript and all authors revised the paper critically for intellectual content and gave approval for the final version.

    References

    1. World Health Organization. Global Suveillance, Prevention and Control of Chronic Respiratory Diseases: A Comprehensive Approach. 2007.   URL: http://www.who.int/gard/publications/GARD%20Book%202007.pdf?ua=1 [accessed 2017-02-15] [WebCite Cache]
    2. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics. 2008.   URL: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/EN_WHS08_Full.pdf [WebCite Cache]
    3. López-Campos JL, Tan W, Soriano JB. Global burden of COPD. Respirology 2016 Jan;21(1):14-23 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Braman SS. The global burden of asthma. Chest 2006 Jul;130(1 Suppl):4S-12S. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Wüthrich B, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schindler C, Imboden M, Bircher A, Zemp E, et al. Prevalence of atopy and respiratory allergic diseases in the elderly SAPALDIA population. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2013;162(2):143-148 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Bridevaux P, Probst-Hensch NM, Schindler C, Curjuric I, Felber DD, Braendli O, et al. Prevalence of airflow obstruction in smokers and never-smokers in Switzerland. Eur Respir J 2010 Dec;36(6):1259-1269 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Jochmann A, Scherr A, Jochmann DC, Miedinger D, Török SS, Chhajed PN, et al. Impact of adherence to the GOLD guidelines on symptom prevalence, lung function decline and exacerbation rate in the Swiss COPD cohort. Swiss Med Wkly 2012 Apr 05;142:w13567 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Soler-Cataluña JJ, Martínez-García MA, Román Sánchez P, Salcedo E, Navarro M, Ochando R. Severe acute exacerbations and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 2005 Nov;60(11):925-931 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Leuppi JD, Steurer-Stey C, Peter M, Chhajed PN, Wildhaber JH, Spertini F. Asthma control in Switzerland: a general practitioner based survey. Curr Med Res Opin 2006 Nov;22(11):2159-2166. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Miedinger D, Neukomm E, Chhajed PN, Schnyder A, Naef M, Ackermann M, et al. The use of the Asthma Control Test in general practice and its correlation with asthma control according to the GINA guidelines. Curr Med Res Opin 2011 Dec;27(12):2301-2308. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Taegtmeyer AB, Steurer-Stey C, Price DB, Wildhaber JH, Spertini F, Leuppi JD. Predictors of asthma control in everyday clinical practice in Switzerland. Curr Med Res Opin 2009 Oct;25(10):2549-2555. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Leuppi JD. [Adherence to asthma therapy]. Ther Umsch 2010 Jun;67(6):323-327. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. World Health Organization. Adherence to Long-Term Therapiesvidence for Action. 2003.   URL: http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_full_report.pdf?ua=1 [accessed 2017-02-15] [WebCite Cache]
    14. George J, Kong DC, Thoman R, Stewart K. Factors associated with medication nonadherence in patients with COPD. Chest 2005 Nov;128(5):3198-3204. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Bourbeau J, Bartlett SJ. Patient adherence in COPD. Thorax 2008 Sep;63(9):831-838 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Gibson PG, McDonald VM, Marks GB. Asthma in older adults. Lancet 2010 Sep 04;376(9743):803-813. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Restrepo RD, Alvarez MT, Wittnebel LD, Sorenson H, Wettstein R, Vines DL, et al. Medication adherence issues in patients treated for COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2008;3(3):371-384 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    18. Yu AP, Guérin A, Ponce de Leon D, Ramakrishnan K, Wu EQ, Mocarski M, et al. Therapy persistence and adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: multiple versus single long-acting maintenance inhalers. J Med Econ 2011;14(4):486-496. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Heuer H, Heuer S, Lenneck K. Compliance in der Arzneitherapie: Von der Non-Compliance zu Pharmazeutischer und Medizinischer Kooperation. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH; 1999.
    20. Vrijens B, De Geest S, Hughes DA, Przemyslaw K, Demonceau J, Ruppar T, ABC Project Team. A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2012 May;73(5):691-705 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Haynes RB, Montague P, Oliver T, McKibbon KA, Brouwers MC, Kanani R. Interventions for helping patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000(2):CD000011. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Bender B, Milgrom H, Rand C. Nonadherence in asthmatic patients: is there a solution to the problem? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997 Sep;79(3):177-85; quiz 185. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Bosley CM, Corden ZM, Rees PJ, Cochrane GM. Psychological factors associated with use of home nebulized therapy for COPD. Eur Respir J 1996 Nov;9(11):2346-2350 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    24. Taylor DR, Kinney CD, McDevitt DG. Patient compliance with oral theophylline therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1984 Jan;17(1):15-20 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    25. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 2005 Aug 04;353(5):487-497. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Vrijens B, Dima AL, Van Ganse E, van Boven JF, Eakin MN, Foster JM, et al. What we mean when we talk about adherence in respiratory medicine. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2016;4(5):802-812 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Lehmann A, Aslani P, Ahmed R, Celio J, Gauchet A, Bedouch P, et al. Assessing medication adherence: options to consider. Int J Clin Pharm 2014 Feb;36(1):55-69. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Sumino K, Cabana MD. Medication adherence in asthma patients. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2013 Jan;19(1):49-53. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Sutton S, Kinmonth A, Hardeman W, Hughes D, Boase S, Prevost AT, et al. Does electronic monitoring influence adherence to medication? Randomized controlled trial of measurement reactivity. Ann Behav Med 2014 Dec;48(3):293-299 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Mäkelä MJ, Backer V, Hedegaard M, Larsson K. Adherence to inhaled therapies, health outcomes and costs in patients with asthma and COPD. Respir Med 2013 Oct;107(10):1481-1490 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Krishnan JA, Bender BG, Wamboldt FS, Szefler SJ, Adkinson NF, Zeiger RS, Adherence Ancillary Study Group. Adherence to inhaled corticosteroids: an ancillary study of the Childhood Asthma Management Program clinical trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012 Jan;129(1):112-118 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Feehan M, Ranker L, Durante R, Cooper DK, Jones GJ, Young DC, et al. Adherence to controller asthma medications: 6-month prevalence across a US community pharmacy chain. J Clin Pharm Ther 2015 Aug 20. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Gamble J, Stevenson M, McClean E, Heaney LG. The prevalence of nonadherence in difficult asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009 Nov 01;180(9):817-822. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Jung E, Pickard AS, Salmon JW, Bartle B, Lee TA. Medication adherence and persistence in the last year of life in COPD patients. Respir Med 2009 Apr;103(4):525-534 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Steiner JF, Prochazka AV. The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol 1997 Jan;50(1):105-116. [Medline]
    36. Simmons MS, Nides MA, Kleerup EC, Chapman KR, Milgrom H, Rand CS, et al. Validation of the Doser, a new device for monitoring metered-dose inhaler use. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998 Sep;102(3):409-413. [Medline]
    37. Coutts JA, Gibson NA, Paton JY. Measuring compliance with inhaled medication in asthma. Arch Dis Child 1992 Mar;67(3):332-333 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    38. Burgess SW, Wilson SS, Cooper DM, Sly PD, Devadason SG. In vitro evaluation of an asthma dosing device: the smart-inhaler. Respir Med 2006 May;100(5):841-845 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Keemink YS, Klok T, Brand PL. Long-term adherence to daily controller medication in children with asthma: the role of outpatient clinic visits. Pediatr Pulmonol 2015 Nov;50(11):1060-1064. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Patel M, Pilcher J, Travers J, Perrin K, Shaw D, Black P, et al. Use of metered-dose inhaler electronic monitoring in a real-world asthma randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2013 Jan;1(1):83-91. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Charles T, Quinn D, Weatherall M, Aldington S, Beasley R, Holt S. An audiovisual reminder function improves adherence with inhaled corticosteroid therapy in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007 Apr;119(4):811-816. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Arnet I, Walter PN, Hersberger KE. Polymedication Electronic Monitoring System (POEMS) - a new technology for measuring adherence. Front Pharmacol 2013;4:26 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, McDonald HP, Yao X. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 Apr 16(2):CD000011. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Lu CY, Ross-Degnan D, Soumerai SB, Pearson S. Interventions designed to improve the quality and efficiency of medication use in managed care: a critical review of the literature - 2001-2007. BMC Health Serv Res 2008 Apr 07;8:75 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Bryant J, McDonald VM, Boyes A, Sanson-Fisher R, Paul C, Melville J. Improving medication adherence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. Respir Res 2013 Oct 20;14:109 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). The Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD. 2017.   URL: http://goldcopd.org [accessed 2017-07-24] [WebCite Cache]
    47. Deutsche Atemwegsliga e.V., In der deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie. Richtig Inhalieren.   URL: http://www.atemwegsliga.de/richtig-inhalieren.html [accessed 2017-02-16] [WebCite Cache]
    48. Melani AS, Zanchetta D, Barbato N, Sestini P, Cinti C, Canessa PA, Associazione Italiana Pneumologi Ospedalieri Educational Group. Inhalation technique and variables associated with misuse of conventional metered-dose inhalers and newer dry powder inhalers in experienced adults. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2004 Nov;93(5):439-446. [Medline]
    49. Rönmark E, Jögi R, Lindqvist A, Haugen T, Meren M, Loit H, et al. Correct use of three powder inhalers: comparison between Diskus, Turbuhaler, and Easyhaler. J Asthma 2005 Apr;42(3):173-178. [Medline]
    50. Nimmo CJ, Chen DN, Martinusen SM, Ustad TL, Ostrow DN. Assessment of patient acceptance and inhalation technique of a pressurized aerosol inhaler and two breath-actuated devices. Ann Pharmacother 1993;27(7-8):922-927. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. van der Palen J, Klein JJ, Kerkhoff AH, van Herwaarden CL, Seydel ER. Evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of three instruction modes for inhaling medicines. Patient Educ Couns 1997 Dec;32(1 Suppl):S87-S95. [Medline]
    52. Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, Wiklund I, Chen W, Kline LN. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur Respir J 2009 Sep;34(3):648-654 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P, et al. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004 Jan;113(1):59-65. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM. The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Respir Med 1991 Sep;85 Suppl B:25-31; discussion 33. [Medline]
    55. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992 Jun;30(6):473-483. [Medline]
    56. Horne R, Weinman J. Patients' beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. J Psychosom Res 1999 Dec;47(6):555-567. [Medline]
    57. Mahler C, Hermann K, Horne R, Jank S, Haefeli WE, Szecsenyi J. Patients' beliefs about medicines in a primary care setting in Germany. J Eval Clin Pract 2012 Apr;18(2):409-413. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. Leuppi JD, Schuetz P, Bingisser R, Bodmer M, Briel M, Drescher T, et al. Short-term vs conventional glucocorticoid therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the REDUCE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013 Jun 05;309(21):2223-2231. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    59. Tschopp J, Frey J, Janssens J, Burrus C, Garrone S, Pernet R, et al. Asthma outpatient education by multiple implementation strategy. Outcome of a programme using a personal notebook. Respir Med 2005 Mar;99(3):355-362 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    60. Wickström G, Bendix T. The “Hawthorne effect”--what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? Scand J Work Environ Health 2000 Aug;26(4):363-367 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    61. McKenney JM, Munroe WP, Wright JT. Impact of an electronic medication compliance aid on long-term blood pressure control. J Clin Pharmacol 1992 Mar;32(3):277-283. [Medline]
    62. Mengden T, Binswanger B, Spühler T, Weisser B, Vetter W. The use of self-measured blood pressure determinations in assessing dynamics of drug compliance in a study with amlodipine once a day, morning versus evening. J Hypertens 1993 Dec;11(12):1403-1411. [Medline]
    63. Rodriguez-Roisin R. Toward a consensus definition for COPD exacerbations. Chest 2000 May;117(5 Suppl 2):398S-401S. [Medline]
    64. Eisen SA, Hanpeter JA, Kreuger LW, Gard M. Monitoring medication compliance: description of a new device. J Compliance Health Care 1987;2(2):131-142. [Medline]
    65. Compendium. Product information Onbrez, Novartis Pharma Schweiz AG, Rischi; Domizil 6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland. 2014.   URL: http://compendium.ch/mpub/pnr/%201154498/html/de?start=1 [accessed 2017-02-15] [WebCite Cache]
    66. Compendium. Product Information Seretide, GlaxoSmithkline AG Münchenbuchsee, Switzerland. 2014.   URL: http://compendium.ch/mpub/pnr/73528/html/de [WebCite Cache]
    67. Compendium. Product Information Spiriva, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, 4002 Basel, Switzerland. 2012.   URL: http://compendium.ch/mpub/pnr/1009898/html/de [WebCite Cache]
    68. Compendium. Product Information Symbicort, AstraZeneca Ag, Zug, Switzerland. 2016.   URL: http://compendium.ch/mpub/pnr/93069/html/de [WebCite Cache]
    69. Compendium. Product Information Ventolin, GlaxoSmithkline AG Münchenbuchsee, Switzerland. 2007.   URL: http://compendium.ch/mpub/pnr/83981/html/de#7900 [WebCite Cache]
    70. Compendium. Product Information Relvar, GlaxoSmithKline AG, Münchenbuchsee, Switzerland. 2016.   URL: http://compendium.ch/mpub/pnr/1258609/html/de#7900 [WebCite Cache]
    71. White IR, Royston P. Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model. Stat Med 2009 Jul 10;28(15):1982-1998 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    72. Lam WY, Fresco P. Medication adherence measures: an overview. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:217047 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]


    Abbreviations

    ACT: Asthma Control Test
    BMQ: Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire
    CAT: COPD Assessment Test
    CI: confidence interval
    COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    HR: hazard ratio
    POEMS: Polymedication Electronic Monitoring System
    RCT: randomized controlled trial
    SF-36: Short Form 36
    SGRQ: St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire
    WHO: World Health Organization


    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 17.02.17; peer-reviewed by A Farmer, P Aslani; comments to author 05.06.17; revised version received 28.07.17; accepted 14.08.17; published 23.10.17

    ©Claudia Gregoriano, Thomas Dieterle, Selina Dürr, Isabelle Arnet, Kurt E Hersberger, Jörg D Leuppi. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 23.10.2017.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.