Explore our sister journals here.

Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 18.01.17 in Vol 6, No 1 (2017): January

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Assessing the Efficacy of an App-Based Method of Family Planning: The Dot Study Protocol"

Rebecca G Simmons, Dominick C Shattuck, Victoria H Jennings

JMIR Res Protoc 2017 (Jan 18); 6(1):e5 

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/resprot.6886):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Peragallo Urrutia R, Polis CB, Jensen ET, Greene ME, Kennedy E, Stanford JB. Effectiveness of Fertility Awareness–Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2018;132(3):591
    CrossRef
  2. Händel P, Wahlström J. Digital contraceptives based on basal body temperature measurements. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 2019;52:141
    CrossRef
  3. Bull JR, Rowland SP, Scherwitzl EB, Scherwitzl R, Danielsson KG, Harper J. Real-world menstrual cycle characteristics of more than 600,000 menstrual cycles. npj Digital Medicine 2019;2(1)
    CrossRef
  4. Ali R, Gürtin ZB, Harper JC. Do fertility tracking applications offer women useful information about their fertile window?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2021;42(1):273
    CrossRef
  5. Shattuck D, Haile LT, Simmons RG. Lessons From the Dot Contraceptive Efficacy Study: Analysis of the Use of Agile Development to Improve Recruitment and Enrollment for mHealth Research. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(4):e99
    CrossRef
  6. Jennings V, Haile LT, Simmons RG, Spieler J, Shattuck D. Perfect- and typical-use effectiveness of the Dot fertility app over 13 cycles: results from a prospective contraceptive effectiveness trial. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 2019;24(2):148
    CrossRef
  7. Said A, Ganso M, Freudewald L, Schulz M. Trends in dispensing oral emergency contraceptives and safety issues: a survey of German community pharmacists. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 2019;41(6):1499
    CrossRef
  8. Bull J, Rowland S, Lundberg O, Berglund-Scherwitzl E, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Trussell J, Scherwitzl R. Typical use effectiveness of Natural Cycles: postmarket surveillance study investigating the impact of previous contraceptive choice on the risk of unintended pregnancy. BMJ Open 2019;9(3):e026474
    CrossRef
  9. Sohda S, Suzuki K, Igari I. Relationship Between the Menstrual Cycle and Timing of Ovulation Revealed by New Protocols: Analysis of Data from a Self-Tracking Health App. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(11):e391
    CrossRef
  10. Gnoth C, Bachmann N, Görner K. Was leisten neue Technologien zur Zyklusüberwachung?. gynäkologie + geburtshilfe 2018;23(5):38
    CrossRef
  11. Karasneh RA, Al-Azzam SI, Alzoubi KH, Muflih SM, Hawamdeh SS. Smartphone Applications for Period Tracking: Rating and Behavioral Change among Women Users. Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2020;2020:1
    CrossRef
  12. Webb S, Cheng A, Simmons R, Peragallo Urrutia R, Jennings V, Witt J. A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Health Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Around Fertility Awareness-Based Methods in Title X Clinics in the United States. Women's Health Reports 2020;1(1):354
    CrossRef
  13. Ford EA, Peters AE, Roman SD, McLaughlin EA, Beckett EL, Sutherland JM. A scoping review of the information provided by fertility smartphone applications. Human Fertility 2022;25(4):625
    CrossRef
  14. Jennings VH, Haile LT, Simmons RG, Fultz HM, Shattuck D. Estimating six-cycle efficacy of the Dot app for pregnancy prevention. Contraception 2019;99(1):52
    CrossRef
  15. Mitake S, Wada‐Hiraike O, Kashiwabara K, Nakamura A, Nasu R, Hine M, Matsuyama Y, Fujii T, Osuga Y. Distribution of the follicular and luteal phase lengths and their age‐dependent changes in Japanese women: A large population study. Reproductive Medicine and Biology 2023;22(1)
    CrossRef
  16. Wood SC, Stevenson EL. Fertility Planning Is More Critical Now Than Ever. Nursing for Women's Health 2023;27(6):400
    CrossRef
  17. Saugar EE, Katsoulos S, Kim H, Fakharzadeh N, Schaffer J, Ahmad M, Zeher C, Benedict M, Gupta S, Foster-Moumoutjis G. Factors Used by Mobile Applications to Predict Female Fertility Status and Their Reported Effectiveness: A Scoping Review. Cureus 2023;
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/resprot.6886):

  1. Raith-Paula E, Frank-Herrmann P. Natürliche Familienplanung heute. 2020. Chapter 14:207
    CrossRef
  2. . Female and Male Contraception. 2021. Chapter 6:59
    CrossRef